Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
I knew Santino was going to have to go through all this . . . but I never wanted this for you. I work my whole life, I don't apologize, to take care of my family, and I refused to be a fool dancing on the strings held by all of those big shots. That's my life, I don't apologize for that, but I always thought that, when it was your time, that you would be the one to hold the strings.
In his introduction to the first major interview conducted with Hal Steinbrenner in roughly 20 years, GQ staff writer Nate Penn positions the younger Hal as the Michael Corleone to older brother Hank's Sonny:
During their first, busy off-season, Hank, 50, emerged as a sort of Sonny Corleone figure, impetuous and impudent, throwing down gauntlets left and right. . . . His outspokennesson subjects ranging from A-Rod to Joe Torre to a possible trade for ace Johan Santanaled many to assume he was running the team, but behind the scenes the chain of command was a work in progress. "They indicated that now Hank is the baseball person," a baffled Scott Boras tells me during the first, ill-fated round of A-Rod negotiations, "yet they had me talk with Hal." . . . Throughout, Hal, 38, remained, like Michael Corleone, in the shadowssubtle, wary of media, a private family man.
The interview is a must-read throughout. In the key sections, Hal explains his vision for how decisions will be made by the team moving forward:
I'm going to sound like a military-school guy, but I'm a big believer in chain of command. Under George, I think a lot of people felt like George was going to make the decision, no matter what, and they just didn't make many decisions. The direction that we're moving toward is more along the lines of how I think an efficient corporation should run. It doesn't mean I'm right, but that's my take. I don't want to have to be here twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, analyzing every single piece of information that comes across the desk and feeling like I need to make decisions that other people are perfectly capable of making.We understand this is New York. We understand winning is expected. We want to win. Even if that wasn't the case, we would want to win; that's just the way we are. But I think we're both more introverted and more analytical. We tend to want to take time to come up with a solution to a problem, as opposed to making a seat-of-the-pantstype decision. And I think that showed in some of these off-season signings. Some people didn't understand why we took so long to decide this or to decide that, but we want to get it right. . . . What's been determined is that this is a family business, and if we're both gonna be involved, it has to be an equal thing, and we both need to be involved with all major decisions, whether it's the stadium, big expenditures, or [the unconsummated trade for Johan] Santana, for instance.
That sort of measured, analytical approach which trusts the expertise of the people hired to make decisions rather than second-guesses or haphazardly overrides them is good news for Yankee fans, as is Hal's attitude toward the team's home grown pitchers. Continuing from above:
It's well publicized in New York that [Hanks and I] didn't agree on that deal. My concerns were economical and financial, and I'm not gonna get into those, but I also had baseball concerns. I didn't want to get rid of these kids! Boy, the last time we had three young pitchers like Philip Hughes, Joba Chamberlain, and Ian Kennedy, I couldn't even tell you. [Never -CJC]The Super Bowl this year was unbelievable, and the one thought I took away really has a lot to do with us this year, with these three young pitchers. Eli struggled a bit his first couple years. I think New York fans might realize now that if you give a young kid time, great things can happen.
Sounds familiar. Elsewhere, Hal confirms the perceived split between his strengths and those of his brother: "My background in grad school [Hal earned an MBA in 1994] led me to do certain things, like finance, that weren't his strong points. Hank always loved the baseball operations and knew the statistics for every player. We each had our strengths."
He also confirmed that his close involvement in the team really only dates back about 12 months, and Hank's even less: "I obviously became considerably more involved at a somewhat dramatic pace when Steve [Swindal], my sister's ex-husband, left [in February of 2007]. A couple months after that, I think Hank realized I could use some help."
As for his father's health, Hal issued a rather defiant "no comment":
GQ: Why is it that the family has chosen not to make a definitive statement on your dad's health?
HS: Because it's a private matter. This is a private corporation. I'm not going to comment about my health, ever. It's the concern of my family and close friends, and as far as I'm concerned, it ends there.Wouldn't it put an end to the media's intrusions into your family's affairs if you just said, "Look, this is what's going on, now leave us alone?"
I could probably flip a coin on that one. No, I'm not convinced. Family matters are family matters. That's the way I view it, and you bet I'm gonna stick to it. There is no doubt our fans have a right to know what's going on with our baseball operations' decision-making, because without them we would not be in business. Do people have a right to know about anything having to do with family, my personal family, my extended family? No. No. And if that creates controversy, well, so be it. You cannot beat me into submission on that. Nobody can.. . . He's here every day, and we run things by him all the time. And there's no doubt in the organization of who still is in charge. . . . I think he's listening to our wisdom, our intuition, and going with recommendations we have, but it's not like we're going to make those decisions without him. It's not like we feel we could. He is the general managing partner.
So he's still calling the shots.
Of course he's calling the shots. You don't think I'm crazy enough to make a decision without him, do you?
Finally, and perhaps most importantly: "We're absolutely not planning on selling the team."
GQ -Are you willing to concede that Boston, my favorite team, is the superior organization right now?
Hal -No, I will never concede. They've got a lot of talent, and you've done very well the past few years, but let me put it this way: I don't think you guys wanted to play us in the ALCS. So I will concede nothing. I think we're better than you.
Man, to be a fly on the wall during those "Cash v. Stick" as "Billy v. George" debates Hal referred to.
5 wowza, what a zinger!
Also, Steve Swindall is Carlo and Billy Martin is/was a less loyal Luca Brasi.
He sounds like my kinda guy.
Woo hoo! (And he's right about the ALCS.)
(duck & cover)
I know he was one of the prospects in the Santana deals.
I read somewhere that someone thought he was 'the next Joba'.
Pretty high praise.
I thought Horne was our most highly prized P after the Big 3, but I am reading good stuff about Marquez.
I also read someone say with Dellin Betances, if he can stablize his mechanics, that 'the sky is the limit'.
So many 'great' pitching prospects never go anywhere. Is the Marquez and Betances talk Yankee-centric, or are these guys really studs, or what?
Betances, kind of like Brackman (both absurdly tall) is raw and talented and projectable - but huge question marks abound. Brackman with the TJ, Betances due to his youth (teen), both with inconsistency and tough mechanics.
My immediate reaction was 1964, and I'm not far off. That year they had pre-injury Jim Bouton (25), Al Downing (23), and Mel Stottlemyre (22), who came up in August and saved their bacon.
The biggest difference was that Bouton and Downing had already put in full seasons in 1963, with Bouton winning 21 games.
32 Yes, Jeff! Not Jason. He started off with a nice couple of months, but then just imploded. Sam Militello is the real sad story from the era though. He had a very good debut season in 1992, but in retrospect, I guess the Yankees shouldn't have had him throw over 200 IP between AAA and the majors.
Worth pointing out: Hal was born in 1969, so it's no surprise that he didn't think of those guys.
Just read Mickey Rivers is at camp, along with Tino, Goose, and Gator. Does Rivers usually show up at camp, or is this a first for him in a while? Cool that Gator's there. No hard feelings, and all that. Mel did the same the spring after he was replaced if I recall correctly.
What strikes me now about that game was, it was early August, and both teams were below .500 and way out of the race. 1992 was, I think, the last time that happened. It seems almost impossible now to imagine it happening anytime soon.
400 ABs, .270, .390, 490, 28 HRs
Got on right at 10AM and was able to score two seats. I was happily surprised.
Next time I bitch about the Yankees clunking around near .500 I'll remember what a real embarrassment looks like and shut myself up.
As an aside, it doesn't appear that they match up well against the Sixers.
26 In my innocent little heart I believed in 1964 that we were going tp be good forever and those guys were the living embodiment of that ineluctable fact. Boy did I have a lot to learn!
Unfortunately, one of the few things I learned was the word ineluctable. F'ing James Joyce.
American Heritage Dictionary
in·e·luc·ta·ble (?n'?-l?k't?-b?l)
adj. Not to be avoided or escaped; inevitable: "Those war plans rested on a belief in the ineluctable superiority of the offense over the defense" (Jack Beatty).
If jack is a Sixers fan, he's patting himself on the back If not, he should be thankful he hasn't actually crossed the street to Madison Square Garbage lately. The laws of physics are under review there after the recent revocation of the law of averages. I would say it was just a matter of time, but then the writ of habeus corpus just received a ten-game suspension for violating the team's media policy, so...
yeah, still sick, going to bed, bye S8p
When I was a kid, someone in my family - a great-uncle, I think - had access to a box at Yankee Stadium, so every year he'd get World Series tickets. My older brother went every year, but I was too young. Finally, one year there was considerable discussion about whether I should go, but I was still pretty young and they figured, OK, next year. Of course, that was 1964.
As Joyce so eloquently put it: ". . . Hey Murdock, '24' my sweet Irish ass, I got your "24" right here you Ausie dope . . ." Boy could he sling it.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.