Baseball Toaster Bronx Banter
Yankee Panky #39: Decline Press
2008-01-21 15:47
by Will Weiss
Note: The Bronx Banter blog has moved to

Before getting into this week’s blog topic, the Yankees made a wise signing this past week, inking Wilson Betemit to a one-year deal to be this year’s version of the perennially-ready utility infielder. He will have to do better than a .333 OPS and a .229 batting average to make the signing worthwhile.

Also, Robinson Cano and Chien-Ming Wang are both seeking raises that would increase their respective salaries to more than $4.5 million from $490,800 and $489,500, respectively. The requests are more than 40 percent higher than what the Yankees are offering. The arbitration situations of Cano and Wang remind me of the 2003-04 offseason, when Alfonso Soriano was arbitration-eligible and asked for a mid-seven-figure deal after a 30-30 season but a vanishing act in the playoffs. The Yankees were down on his attitude and lack of plate discipline, and did not want to agree to pay him upwards of $5 million, when they had just paid him $800,000. The rift and the lack of interest in going to arbitration led to Soriano’s inclusion in the A-Rod trade. Upon his arrival in Texas, Soriano received the raise he sought, getting a salary bump $5.4 million.

The Yankees are higher on Cano and Wang than they were on Soriano, and it can certainly be said that those two players have been more responsible for the Yankees’ success the last two years than Soriano was at any point during his time in NY. If the Yankees are serious about committing to the future and building from within, they’ll make an effort to compromise with both players.

Who else wants to hear, see and read more about that development than jokes about Roger Clemens' butt?

(Raising hand)

* * * * *

This winter, more than any other in recent memory, has been all about the personal downfall and the media’s hastiness to find a soapbox and claim moral superiority. It’s not just relegated to baseball, but for the purposes of this blog and keeping the focus on the diamond, I’d like to focus on two former Yankees and the ways their foibles (one alleged and one actual) are being portrayed.

Since the Mitchell Report was released the press is staking out certain players, most notably Roger Clemens, ready to pounce on his character and discredit him when the opportunity arises. His former trainer, Brian McNamee, may be credible, based on a NY Daily News story printed in Sunday’s editions. Various reports have sought to discredit McNamee over the past month, also, but the focus has largely been on Clemens, McNamee and which of the two telling the truth. Clemens, Chuck Knoblauch and others will tell their versions – because let’s be honest, no one knows the whole truth – in front of Congress on Feb. 13, shortly before pitchers and catchers are set to report to camp. To date, as has been pointed out in this space, Clemens has been treated with a “guilty until proven innocent” line. His statements to date have not been tantamount to contrition.

Contrast that with the story of Jim Leyritz, who has gone from World Series hero to criminal. He faces a Jan. 30 arraignment on two counts of DUI-related vehicular manslaughter. If convicted, he could be jailed for 15 years or more.

The reporting that’s surfaced in Leyritz’s case is investigative journalism intended not only to unearth facts of the case, but to reveal details of the real Jim Leyritz. Records obtained by the Daily News a couple of weeks ago presented what’s become the archetypal fall of the professional athlete: financial problems due to bad advice, excessive partying, drinking and reveling in their status.

I met Leyritz several times in my years covering the team, and in one of those meetings, at Spring Training, we got to talking for a bit, just off the cuff. I asked how he was doing, if he was enjoying retirement and his work with He mentioned how he was living in Florida and volunteered that he was going through a vicious divorce and custody battle; all he wanted to do was take care of his children. While I thought it awkward that he’d volunteer that information to a stranger, I found it respectable that he was working so hard to be a role model for his kids. I don’t believe I misjudged Jim when I met him. He was a likeable, engaging guy. But I instantly flashed back to that meeting in the clubhouse in Tampa when he recounted the story of driving down to pick up his kids and thinking, “What changed?” Not for a second did I think that Leyritz being “Too Much Information Guy” could have been a signal for some deeper issues.

I recall this story and note the differences in coverage between Clemens and Leyritz because there are two different philosophies based on the player’s status both in the game, and to the fans. Clemens has been a love-him-or-hate-him type player for 25 years. Because he hasn’t done anything to endear himself, the media, for the most part, are jumping at the chance to convict him in the court of public opinion. There’s no need for the media to facilitate judgment or influence opinion in this case. Each fact as it is being introduced is mounting evidence against Leyritz, making his conviction almost certain.

There has been a lot of talk in the New York area, as well as some buzz on, about the Mets’ interest in authoring a trade for Johan Santana. When the best you can say is that you’ve severed ties with Lastings Milledge, signed Jose Valentin and avoided arbitration with Aaron Heilman, you need to do something. Until something is done, I’m not ruling out the Yankees.

Until next week …

2008-01-22 07:02:22
1.   rbj
Consider my hand raised. Spend a few more $ now with Wang & Cano, and who knows, they may give a hometown discount later on. Next year there won't be the Giambi, Moose and perennially injured guy salaries to pay.

Leyritz is pretty much an open & shut case: DUI + two dead = not much to talk about. With Roger & Brian, it is more of a who is telling more of the truth than the other. I have to reserve judgment on that situation. I think Jim was trying to be a role model to his kids; we all have blind spots about ourselves that take a real situation to bring forward.

2008-01-22 07:13:21
2.   liam
congrats.. peter gammons named you guys in his blog today.
2008-01-22 07:19:59
3.   JasonO
Weiss, the media's glaring failure is to properly question and categorize the serious flaws in the Mitchell report. It's risible that Mitchell gets a free pass from the a) Red Sox conflict of interest and b) overwhelming credibility problems of the two primary sources.

To my knowledge he was asked about this once: During the initial report press conference. He sidestepped the question by creating a bullshit, tortured analogy of this "report" to his involvement in the N. Ireland negotiations. Beyond flimsy.

2008-01-22 08:47:03
4.   JL25and3
3 I think those are strictly subsidiary issues, distractions, because they assume that the naming of players is the most important part of the report. The true glaring failure of the media is to cover the Mitchell report as if it were the Clemens report. That accomplishes Selig's objective, which is to focus everything on the players and the MLBPA. the more we argue about the specific players and the allegations, the more we validate Selig and Co.
2008-01-22 09:26:24
5.   wsporter
3 "Risible" a GRE/Monty Python word: nice get!

4 I agree this focus on the report flaws plays right into the ongoing BS deflection and abdication of responsibility on the part of ownership. They crafted the story by releasing names and now sit back under the cover of the canard that they're actually doing something all the while accepting pats on the back from Congress. Ownership turned a blind eye to this issue for years and reaped a financial windfall therefrom. Now they're "shocked, shocked to find PEDs are going on in there". Could this be any more transparent? Somehow they seem to have taken a pass on this one. I guess Bud did "earn " that raise after all; "brilliant" work. What else could we expect from a used car salesman?

2008-01-22 09:52:40
6.   markp
3-5: agree, agree, and agree. The needed a white scapegoat and when the music stopped, Roger didn't have a chair.

I still can't believe that nobody in the media has mentioned Mitchell's sleazy work for Selig in discrediting the MLBPA a few years ago when the issue of his integrity comes up.

2008-01-22 10:44:46
7.   Chyll Will
5 "The only thing I know about the dark is you can't see in it."

"Hmph...a pure canard."

"What's a canard?"

"A prevarication..."

"What's that mean?"

"A lie."

Canards apparently come in only pure form, but with a little alchemy they can form hybrids and alloys such as prevarications and half-truths. Those little white ones you see a lot don't mean much, but still have value, especially over time. There are plenty of others, but they all derive from pure canards.

2008-01-22 10:50:21
8.   Sliced Bread
No critical analysis of the Mitchell report in today's papers - but I did find several different views (1 in color) of Lindsay Lohan's right buttock.
Surely, the end of this most miserable baseball winter is near.
2008-01-22 10:55:36
9.   Chyll Will
8 Do you think the Angels knew what they were getting when they traded Jose Molina for Jeff Kennard?
2008-01-22 11:10:40
10.   Sliced Bread
9 a pure kennard?
2008-01-22 11:27:27
11.   wsporter
7 Where would obfuscation come in Mr. Hobbs?

10 No, that was Jeff. His cousin Muddy is the only "pure" Kennard I know of.

2008-01-22 11:35:39
12.   Chyll Will
10 Well, he didn't appear in the report...
2008-01-22 11:51:04
13.   Shaun P
11 Scientific progress goes 'boink'?

Wait, that was Hobbes, not Hobbs. Whoops, my bad.

Then again, if Canseco is right, taking steroids could be considered transmogrifying oneself . . .

2008-01-22 12:22:34
14.   Chyll Will
13 Calvinball should be the national pastime during the offseason. It even has it's own anthem:

"Other kids' games are such a bore!
They've gotta have rules and they gotta keep score!
Calvinball is better by far!
It's never the same! It's always bizzare!
You don't need a team or a referee!
You know that it's great 'cause it's named after me!"

2008-01-22 12:57:01
15.   JL25and3
14 Calvinball should be the national pastime all year. It's an awesome game.
2008-01-22 13:59:44
16.   wsporter
15 It's the only game.
2008-01-22 16:09:43
17.   underdog
Okay, 'fess up, what did you guys tell Don Mattingly? (See Dodger Thoughts)
2008-01-22 16:25:13
18.   Chyll Will
We have no comment at this time...
2008-01-22 18:38:17
19.   Shaun P
17 I knew those ugly rumors about Mattingly being named the Dodgers' hitting coach were untrue!


Any more news as to what the family issue was/is?

2008-01-22 21:10:11
20.   underdog
Jon's got more about this on his latest posting at DT. Sounds like it was less of an emergency than a sudden realization that he didn't want to be away from his younger kids all season this year - but Mattingly said he'd like to do it next year. He'll serve as a scout and consultant and attend some games, especially ones in the midwest near where he lives. But doesn't sound like it was anything bad, just a change of heart.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.