Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
I'm in the process of putting the final proof-reading touches on The Best Sports Writing of Pat Jordan. (The book will be released next spring.) I am the editor of the project, which, in many ways, has been like making a literary mix tape. Jordan has long been one of my favorite writers, so it has been an utter joy to read through well over one hundred of his magazine pieces from the past 40 some oddd years and select 25 cherce cuts for this collection.
I'll have more to say about Pat and the book as the release date approaches. In the meantime, you can check out a bunch of Pat's New York Times work, which has recently been made available via the Times on-line archive (the only piece that is there that is also in the forthcoming book is the Roger Clemens story).
Here is an excerpt from a piece Pat wrote about clubhouse harmony in spring training, 1989, when both the Mets and Yankees were dealing with "chemistry" issues. I thought you guys would get a kick out of it:
Reporters, however, take the...disturbances seriously. They wonder, in print and on television, if dissension is ripping apart what they perceive as the delicately stitched fabric of clubhouse harmony each team must weave if it is to be successful? They see it all so clearly from their perspective, as men and women who have never been part of such clubhouses. They have always imparted to clubhouse harmony a certain romance of brotherhood they would only laugh at if someone tried to impart it, say, to the boardroom of I.B.M. They see relationships among players in a baseball clubhouse as merely an extension of the child-play relationships they remember from their youth.In a way, this is condescending to the players, implying as it does a childishness on their part, which, as grown men, they don't have. What reporters see, then, exists only in their mind's eye. Which is why the players laugh. They know that clubhouse harmony or the lack of it hasn't much to do with a team's success on the field. Players know that good-natured camaraderie in the clubhouse, shared intimacies over a locker, plans to get together with families for a cookout on a day off, all have nothing to do with a team's success.
...Like most men in business, baseball players compartmentalize their jobs. What goes on across the white lines is infinitely more important than what goes on behind them. A close friend who consistently strikes out with the bases loaded isn't as much use to a ballplayer as a despised teammate who consistently strokes game-winning hits. The respect a player feels for a teammate's personal life has nothing to do with the respect he feels for a teammate's baseball talent. Babe Ruth, Pete Rose and Wade Boggs are three of the greatest hitters ever in the game, and yet not many teammates might envy their personal lives. Yet to a man, every player in the game would want one of those three at the plate if a World Series championship was on the line.
Check it out. There is even a "Rickey being Rickey" line about Henderson, the original Manny.
The next time someone mentions "chemistry" to me, I'm going to tell them about Jordan and Hendricks.
Ruth and Gehrig weren't exactly chummy, either.
It's funny how images from Jordan's pieces have stuck with me. I remember he did a profile of baseball owners in the 90s which had an observation about Bud Selig at a salad bar that I thought was just perfect.
If a guy continually let off-field stuff bother him on-field, he'd never do well enough to make it to the bigs.
Looking forward to the book, Alex.
Is the Bernie piece gonna make the cut?
Are you taking requests?
Also, was Pete Rose really that great a hitter? Not a fair question I guess since '89 is well before good metrics were developed. But still couldn't one come up with dozens of better hitters as of then using old methods?
Not me. Guy hit .202 in AA!
http://tinyurl.com/26aq76
Yeah, I prefer his baseball stuff, especially his pitcher profiles, because that's where he comes from, but it's all good. I don't recall ever reading anything by him on hoops, or some of the other sports you mentioned, so I'm looking forward to it.
I hate when a guy has a bad day and the press is so quick to blame it on personal or clubhouse issues, but on the other side of the coin they're human. Witness ARods slump approaching #500, after stripper-gate, etc.
If you total up the Yanks' VORP for 2007 (and exclude the little bit generated by pitchers hitting in interleague games), you get 359.9.
I took the guys likely to constitute the offense next year (Posada, Jeter, Cano, Matsui, Giambi, Damon, Melky, Abreu, Duncan, Molina, Phillips, Betemit, and Gonzalez). If you take the 3-year average of those guys' VORPs, and adjust where necessary*, I got a team VORP of 329. I'll be happy to share the numbers if you like.
*For example, Posada's 3 year average is 46 - which is clearly brought up by his 73.4 in 2007. (The other 2 years were 26.4 and 38). So I adjusted his down to 30.
Similarly, Giambi's 3 year average is 19.8, clearly dragged down by his 7.3 in 2007. (The other 2 years were 50.7 and 47.4). So I adjusted his up to 40.
And, obviously, guys like Duncan and the AG only have data for last year, so I didn't use the average there. But I think the values I did use (10 and -2, respectively) were quite fair.
Maybe Cano never figures out how to hit in the early months.
And let's pray Jeter's and Matsui's knee issues are resolved.
Also, how did you get asterisks to show up without everything being bold? Are you secretly Don Shula?
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.