Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Alex Rodriguez's sense of timing should never come as a surprise. He's able to put himself right smack in the spotlight at exactly the wrong moment. It takes some kind of chutzpah to do what he did on Sunday. According to numerous reports, Scott Boras informed the Yankees yesterday afternoon that Rodriguez will opt out of his contract, thus ending his four-year stint in pinstripes.
"Alex made the decision today," Boras said. "I thought we should notify the club."
"We really wanted him back, but obviously he didn't want to be a Yankee," Hank Steinbrenner said late last night. "I just think that's a shame. But if that's the case, then this is goodbye."
I'm not shocked that Rodriguez is jetting. You could see it coming. And I can't say that I'm entirely surprised at how it came out. I knew it would come down to something weird like this. Still, a hell of a way to go, ain't it? Just another reason to wonder what's next? But my immediate guess is that this means Joe Girardi will be named skipper today.
Also, congrats go out to the Red Sox and, more to the point, any Red Sox fans who frequent Bronx Banter. The Sox are a deserving champion. Did the Rockies even show up? Wow.
puke
I really thought he was going to stay. His teammates loved him this year, the press for the most part did as well (see RLYW's cover counter), and he won't get more money somewhere else. Guess none of that was enough to overcome his hatred for the city.
Living in Boston it is very hard for me to feel congratulatory - but I will say I feel somehwat better than I thought I would - in part because after last year's joke of the Cardinals winning - I am glad the superior team won
a new direction.
we're just a scrappy little wild card team undergoing a rebuilding phase.
they have to leak a manager today. positivity.
to be honest, i felt a little guilty rooting for rodriguez. screw him.
he has been 134ed.
So. Money to spend, and a new philosophy to pursue...
Free agent pitching? Price (in bodies, not $$$) for Santana?
I hope it was something like "I didn't get along with my teammates." Like he will somewhere else.
all props should be given, and they are deserved.
props and congrats.
(Either that or Black Sunday.)
I think it's less A-Rod's decision and more Boras'
For all the hate I have for A-Rod right now, I am grateful for one thing: his opting out during the 3rd inning kept me from dwelling on what was unfolding in Denver. Thank you, A-Rod! You're a klassy guy!
then we get a killer 2B. and santana. and dimaggio (either dimaggio).
then? we're set.
Nice response. Two can play at this game.
Announcing during the world series (on a night that should be purely for those two teams) that you won't even return the Steinbrenner's phone calls. Well, as much as I hate to quote that fat turd, "Bush League."
On the other hand, it's going to be interesting to see what he gets and from whom.
basically on friday there was some back and forth between two posters (we think in a joking manner)
anyway post 134 mysteriously disappeared and it heightened the mystery.
so when people say it was 134ed it means something disappeared
Article 134 of the American UCMJ is the catch-all article, for offences "not specifically mentioned in this chapter." Article 134 has been used to prosecute a wide variety of offences, from cohabitation by personnel not married to each other to statements critical of the U.S. President. Some prisoners at Abu Ghraib were tagged with this number.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/134_(number)
So if ARod has be 134ed, then we can now ascribe to him all the failings of the Yankees for the past few years.
Ditto!
Now .... A-Rod could have said ... "I want Mo, Po and Pet back next year, and I'm willing to defer X million of my salary to help with the luxury tax if you can sign them all and give me an extension".
But we all know the odds of that happening.
p.s. I still wouldn't mind Beltre at 3rd, even at his inflated salary and .270ish BA. His defense is outstanding .... he's still young, and he keeps his nose clean (I think).
It sucks that A-Rod is leaving, but if this is the way he chooses to leave then so be it. He will go down as baseball's greatest nomad. Hank had a pretty good line in the Times: "Does he want to go into the Hall of Fame as a Yankee, or a Toledo Mud Hen?"
Arod was great...I loved him. But if he wants to move, the Yankees can too.
http://tinyurl.com/2eot2
I hadn't looked in awhile - I thought Philly would have been higher
The fans and the team may have been in a bit of denial for 4 years about what kind of disruption this guy causes wherever he goes, but last night he showed his true colors.
8th inning of the clinching game of the World Series, indeed.
Buh-bye, greedy attention whore. Nice knowin' ya.
Let's use this money to shore up the bullpen now, please. Work your magic, Cash.
The Dodgers will give you Scott Proctor for Wilson Betemit. Straight up.
Wonder how the A-Rod apologists apologize for this big "F.U. and your measly $27M a year".
Varitek, Schilling, Pedroia - you think any of these guys could co-exist with A-Rod?
I say Cubbies. Piniella's probably working the phones as we speak.
Completely forgot about the AS Game. Wow, it's going to be noisy.
sunovabeetch.
I think besides the money (which is on a level by itself) he wants to be "the man" and be in a park that will help his records chase
i could be wrong.
HOME: .323/.418/.575
ROAD: .276/.339/.428
Here's one thought...why not sign Barry Bonds? He would easily replace Arod's lost offense when healthy. I know he isn't a popular figure, but I'd sure love to see him hitting with the game on the line.
tell me now, or you take that back.
isn't donnie's son in the dodger system?
my heart sank as i pieced this hypothetical together.
49 Nice link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/134_(number)
Forget last night and the Sox - good for them, they're not nearly as annoying as the 2004 team.
Start looking ahead to 2008 in the Bronx.
85 If they sign Bonds, I think you'd then look to unload Giambi (maybe send him back to Oakland by eating half his deal). Having both would probably be impossible.
I will have to say that I am quite impressed with Ellsbury's talent. I'd like to see Melky approach his ABs more like him - and I think Melky can get more doubles - steal more bases and so on
Colorado owner Charlie Monfort insisted after Game 4 of the World Series that the Rockies are a better team than the Boston Red Sox, a team that outscored them 29-10 in a four-game Series sweep. "These guys did amazing things," Monfort said. "I think this team is a better team than Boston. It would have been nice to have another two, three, four days. We'll wake up tomorrow and go, 'There's no baseball game to go to,' but what a deal they did. It's an amazing thing they accomplished just to get here." They were amazing, all right. But better than the Red Sox? "I think so," said Monfort. "How did we win 21 out of 22? We got the breaks. And I think they got the breaks. Are they a better team? I don't think so. You give us 10 games against them, we'll beat them six." --
Personally, Bonds is where I draw my line between wanting to win and wanting to root for ballplayers. I'm sure he could help offensively, but it would tear me up seeing him play for the Yanks. With Bonds objectivity is out the window for me. I want no part of that.
Phase 2: ??????????
Phase 3: Profit
(or some other team... i'll decide if necessary.)
Just not sure how it would all play out - and as joex3 said - the lineup is too lh (eben though Arod's splits were much better aganist RHP) - which is why a slimmed down Cabrera would be nice or even Beltre - but I am also against overpaying for either which would be hard for Cashman to pull off.
109 I wasn't aware of those specific allegations. Have they been substaniated? I guess my point is everyone villifies Bonds, but in reality, he isn't much worse than many others...something we are going to find out when the Mitchell report is released. I personally do not dislike Barry Bonds because he has never really been a phony when not trying to avoid federal indictment :). The fact that he doesn't treat the media well doesn't concern me much.
If A-Rod takes the proposed five year extension, the Yanks probably end up having him play 3 years as a DH or 1st baseman. I imagine there are better ways to spend $30 mil a year.
If the Yanks spend the money that they were going to spend on him wisely, they end up with a much better and more balanced team then they have had in a while.
Hell, the Yanks won more playoffs and WS games with Brosius at 3rd than they ever did with A-Rod.
112 I think the Mitchell report could vindicate Bonds somewhat.
http://tinyurl.com/2kk8on
if you need more than a playboy interview to sway you, well... i can't help you. there is a reason why this publication has been around so long:
investigative journalism.
___________________________
The Yankees officially offered their managerial job to Joe Girardi Monday morning and he is expected to accept it, a source has told 1050 ESPN New York's Andrew Marchand. Yankees general manager Brian Cashman told
Don Mattingly and Tony Pena that they will not be getting the job.
Girardi was in the Denver for the World Series. A source said he is expected to fly to New York for the announcement, which is likely to come Tuesday. Girardi's contract is expect to be in the three-year, $6 million range.
Mattingly will not accept a position on the Yankees coaching staff, Marchand and ESPN The Magazine's Buster Olney are reporting.
Girardi will be a fine manager but I was rooting for Mattingly - like I've done since I was a kid.
Kudos on the South Park reference ...
Personally, I'd move Jeter to a corner infield position before moving Cano to 3B.
Ideally, sign Bonds for one year, then shed both him and Giambi the following year.
Truth is, it's a great idea if you can get past Bond's smell (which I personally don't mind). He WANTS to play here. He could be had for until $10m. My guess is, as a DH, he would be healthy most of the year.
The guy posted a 1+ OPS this year, while still playing the OF, in a stadium with a very imposing RF. He could be AWESOME in Yankee stadium.
Good call William. I didn't have the balls to mention it myself.
I somehow feel A-Rod is being hypnotized by Boras ("You don't need to see that contract offer. These aren't the terms you're looking for."), because I don't want to believe a person can be such a bald-faced liar ("I don't see myself playing anywhere else").
I dunno. No A-Rod. $26 million for old Mo and old Posada three seasons from now.
Worried.
And with that, I just read from Heyman that Boras has sent in the paperwork and the Yankees should have received it this morning.
Is it OK to get a Juan Pierre type on steroids because he still sucks, while Giambi and Bonds prospered?
Does anyone thinks it a little unfair that Bonds, and maybe Raf and Jason, are the only guys getting 'hated' because of steroids.
And it seems to me that ARod got a LOT of love here this year, and the majority wanted him back. Now we're glad he's gone? Isn't this behavior little Redsoxish?
And the Fenway 'Park Factor' doesn't tell the story. Ala Mike Lowell, righties have a party there, while lefties have a huge RF to deal with. ARod might set the MLB record for doubles if he goes to the Sox, and he will still hit plenty of HRs. I know we are bitter about ARod, but please don't say you are OK if he signs with the Sox.
Next year, you really want to face a 3-4-5 of ARod, Papi and Manny?
Does anyone know if Girardi had a good (or even decent) relationship with Miguel Cabrera? Might that be part of the thinking in play here?
Cabrera's eating and work habits worry me, but if those could be fixed . . . he turns 25 in April 2008. Having his prime late 20s/early 30s seasons might be more valuable than having A-Rod's mid-to-late 30s seasons.
139 Nice postmodern self-reference.
That'd show'em.
159 Are you a Dodgers fan?
I think if the Yanks want to make a "spite" move, it'd be to sign Manny when he's a free agent after next year. (To a short-term deal, of course.) Of course, so many Sox fans don't appreciate Manny, so who knows how far the spite will go.
Was it that obvious...?
Avg AL 1B >> Jeter's bat (not enough power, which only gets worse over time)
And who says Jeter can play 1B? He'd certainly be one of the rare righty-throwing 1Bs.
Also, one other note...when Arod walked away from the M's, they signed the likes of Ichiro and Brett Boone. On paper, that seemed like a bad trade off, but it turned into a 116 win season. Who knows, maybe the Yankees make a key trade, sign Fukodome, or something else. The point is, it's October 29, not March 29. The Arod loss stings, but there is plenty of time to reform the team.
167 It is possible - not always easy - to draft guys who are ready right away, or darn quickly. For example, Matt LaPorta was drafted by the Brewers this year, and could be in the bigs next year. Ryan Braun was in the majors less than 2 years after he was drafted. Those are exceptions, obviously, but its still possible.
Actually, I do think 2008 is the hardest year, both because of transition (Torre, ARod, Donnie, ect) and because the farm is not quite ready to produce position players.
And I agree with you William that this is a challenge for Cashman, and I do have faith in Cashman.
Right now, we have no real 1Bman. With Bonds, as Mats suggests, we could play Giambi at 1st until he hurts himself. While Bonds is an ugly choice, as pointed out, it's a 1 year gig, and his bat is as good as ARods, and probably better at Yankee Stadium.
Does everyone here think Mo and Po will resign (probably for 3 years each)?
Life goes on - but I hope like heck Mattingly isn't offended by all of this. Let's hope someone told him, as Alex has said so often - you don't want to be the guy who follows Joe Torre. You want to be the guy after the guy who follows Joe Torre.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7388184
More important, what difference does the money make? It would only make a difference if the $30M prevented them from making some other significant move. But the Yankees have only done that once, and I think they learned from that one.
Either plan would leave MAttingly in the wings to replace Girardi, when the inevitable occurs. Moreover, it means that two former heirs apparent (Donnie and Willie) would be floating around the league, increasing the chances that one of them ends up with the club at some point.
I see it the other way. Losing Rodriguez, along with a weak FA class, makes it much more likely that they'll throw too much money at the wrong guy. I'd much rather overpay for Rodriguez than for Lowell.
(* = if they don't panic and spend for the sake of spending in the interim.)
Maybe that's why Hank said some of what he has said.
I don't want to panic for 2008 and do something like this.
We can follow a plan similar to the way the Red Sox did from 2004 to now - only with more money and margin for error
I'm waiting for Hank to drop a "Maybe we'll win in the playoffs now."
Phil might end up being great. So may Tabata. Cabrera is great. That's why that won't be close to enough.
You're not worried about his weight?
And why not wait 1 more year and try to get him as a FA (unless the concern is the Marlins will trade him to someone this year?)
#1 (Wishful Thinking) Despite the public announcement, maybe ARod hasn't signed the papers yet to withdraw from the contract. Maybe Boras is just putting extra pressure on the Yanks.
#2 (Deep Pessimism) ARod believes, based on the treatment of Torre, that with nobody in charge, the Yanks are going to be mismanaged, thus an unpleasant place to work. He doesn't want to stay, even if he has to earn less somewhere else. If this theory is true, Posada and Mo may feel the same way. Furthermore, if the Yanks are indeed mis-managed, that portends nothing good.
194 I agree with 198 . As long as he doesn't get traded he will be available in a year. I would rather not give up a lot for one extra year of Cabrera. Tabata is probably the best I would want to give up.
I'm not so sure Cash has invested so much in the farm system just to dump guys the first time a pretty new girl shows up at the ball, so to speak.
Pitching and defense wins championships.
it's sort of a super sensitive topic, but, um, here goes...
what do you suppose Suzyn Waldman is going to do with the "A-ROD #13 YANKEE 4-EVAH!" tattoo on the small of her back?
Please don't ask how I know about this. I just do, OK?
And it's nice to say that "pitching and defense win championships," but it's only partly true. Seems to me that if the Rockies had hit a little better, the Series would be at 2-2 right now.
Until Cabrera actually shows signs of slowing down because of the weight issue, I'm going to assume they're exaggerated.
"Spoke to some people who were in Denver for Game 4 last night. The Red Sox fans at Coors Field gathered behind the dugout to celebrate the victory and at one point started chanting, Don't Sign A-Rod!"
call it a gut feeling, but i don't think the sox are going to be a player for A-rod, if they can wrap up Lowell at a decent cost and length of contract ... my early bet is the Dodgers
as a side note ... anyone else note that in the top of the 8th, up 4-1, red sox fans at coors started a "yankees suck" chant that could be heard on the fox telecast???
stay classy, red sox fans, stay classy ...
Is that sarcasm? Boston fans love manny. He's forgiven things in boston that he'd never get away with elsewhere. Perhaps you were thinking of a different manny?
1) get out from under the luxury tax in '08 and '09
2) LOWER ticket prices (yeah right)
Meanwhile, the Marlins move Willis for peanuts, which is really all he's worth right now, which "frees up" enough money to easily pay Miggy whatever he wins in arbitration this year. Cabrera becomes a free agent and the Yanks pounce.
This fits Florida's MO, because it lets them still campaign for a new publicly funded stadium for another year - and then complain how they could have kept Cabrera if only they had gotten their publicly funded stadium.
215 Even though we all think of the Yanks' resources as limitless, of course its not true. I think they are going to make sure they avoid the luxury tax for many years to come. Great point, Diana.
I always thought that Alex would opt out, especially when he put on the "I don't care any more" face. But then he played the "I loved NY" card so I thought that I might have been wrong. Ha. Oh well, he is a great player and I loved watching him at his best even though he could be annoying with his psychodramas.
RIYank, to continue our conversation from the thread below. Wait and see. No way Boras enthusiastically supports Alex opting out if he wasn't sure that there is an owner willing to pay him the $30 million/8 years. Alex is getting his money.
Mystery. Some people are sincere, and generous and people center, while others are pretentious and self centered. Jeter sees a character defect in Alex: He just has class enough not to articulate it. Do you think Pavano will be back next year? LOL
Tim Marchman's interesting take on Alex ...
I'm not thrilled with Girardi as manager, but he may not last long anyway, especially if he decides to blow out one of the Yankees' young pitchers' arms with high pitch counts a la the Marlins.
Pavano coming back next year? (shudder)
I mean, how am I gonna top my fantasy team name from this season, "Pavanomas no mas" ???
(thinking about all the mean A-Rod team name possibilities)
1. Thanks for all the gracious comments. I know that watching the Sox' domination over the last week and a half wasn't easy.
2. Until the NL adopts the DH, it will always be a weak sister. The Rockies wouldn't be one of the best 4-5 teams in the AL.
3. The best thing to come out of the Serious, from the perspective of a Sox fan, is that it will now be impossible for Theo to let Lowell walk and to sign A-Fraud. Should that occur, I transfer my allegiance henceforth to the Tribe. The difference between Lowell and A-Rod in terms of numbers is more than compensated for by what Lowell brings to the clubhouse.
4. There is nothing Hanley Ramirez can possibly do over the course of his career to negate the success of the deal for the Sox. This one pans out for both sides.
As for me, I hated the Yankees long before I was a Sox fan. (see: Newcombe, Don)
Its entirely possible they decide to let Lowell walk - and sign A-Rod, not to replace him, but to play SS.
1. He doesn't even like baseball
2. Why is he making decisions?
3. He actually has a bigger mouth
as a yankee fan, i'm terrified right now
I thought Miggy, maybe aside from Ryan Howard, was the best, youngest talent for the buck. But if it this phase in his career, and playing for the Marlins no less, he has already trashed his body, and I hear his defense sucks, how does that portate(?) to playing under the lights in NY? The guy is hugely talented, but I don't think he will shine here.
If the Sox don't sigh ARod, why would they let Lowell go? He is literally a perfect fit in Boston.
While I'm not happy about ARod leaving, the circumstances are not an issue. If he's going to go, you know Boras is going to make sure it's a show. Its back to business. And I can't help but remember the way the media and the fans treated ARod before this year. He had to literally put up one of the best years in the last 50 to get some love. Honestly, while I think it was a bad more for his legacy, I can't blame the guy for leaving. Too many stories about blonds and not enough about the best player in the game being the first one to start work and the last one to leave. Imagine if Cabreara had the same work ethic as ARod.
We still have 4 OFers and Giambi. Will we make a move on one of them?
That being said, does anyone else feel like the media narrative is "Those plucky Red Sox overcame the curse AGAIN!!11!!1! Can you believe it? this team has grit and moxcoity and gutacularity by the Erstad!" Honestly, the ESPN headline was about the curse of Mientkiewicz and how it only lasted three years!
On paper, I don't see how Sox fans could not salivate at the chance of replacing Julio Lugo with A-Rod.
Would it take more or less than, say, Melky & Wang & IPK?
i am clearly grasping at straws.
We'd never get him, of course.
If Cashman could get Pujols without giving up Phil OR Joba, I would start a religion devoted to him.
10) We still might see #800
9) We had the best 'clean' player, so why not give this a try.
8) Giambi won't look so bloated in comparison.
7) If some other Yankee names show up on the Mitchell list, no one will really care.
6) Some people actually miss Gary Sheffield
5) We won't have to worry, his head is too big to fit on most billboards in Times Square
4) Just imagine what Red Sox fans will say. This in itself is reason enough.
3) He does not want to sleep over at Jeter's house
2) If he gets hit in the nuts with a shorthop, he probably won't get hurt.
1) He may be a cheater and the most reviled man in baseball, but he is still an incredible talent, and when he comes to the plate, there are fewer more electrified moments in baseball. For one year, it would be fun.
2. The Red Sox were pretty awesome in October this year, and it's hard to deny that in the end they were the best team in baseball. I didn't say that about the Cardinals last year, that's for sure.
3. My impression is that quite a lot of baseball America now despises the Red Sox at least as much as they despise the Yankees. I haven't done a poll or anything, just my impression (check out other Toaster blogs, for instance).
4. Using some of the freed up money to dump an over-paid Yankee or two on some other team in exchange for a younger, more promising player, that strikes me as an excellent idea. But it all depends on the details...
i was throwing out a hypothetical.
at this point, all we know about the team as far as changes in personnel goes, is that rodriguez won't be around and that torre is gone.
i'm just taking a stab in the dark.
http://tinyurl.com/2qttvk
The idea is to swallow a bunch of the money, and then trade him.
The other stuff you've said, well, I won't bother.
For the record, I wouldn't mind taking a run at Bonds for one year if we could trade of Giambi or Matsui. Would the Twins take a look at Giambi as a DH (as part of a Santana deal) if we paid a huge chunk of his salary? Could we trade Matsui for Richie Sexson?
Bring a kid in to play 3B.
Ty Wiggington?
Is he still considered "young"?
Could we extract him cheaply enough?
I love his swing well enough and all, but I've always been more breathtaken by his glove.
Also, he's one hell of a baserunner.
Can't we find a .320, slick-fielding, 20-HR, fundamentally solid 3B to take his place?
Fare thee well, Alex. And thanks for all the fish!
(i kid.)
Well .... Ty certainly wouldn't be my first choice for 3B .... but as a 1 year stopgap ...
Too bad Morgan Ensberg forgot how to hit ...
at least i got -something- out of this.
What do ya'll think it would take to get Dunn? (ignore logjam issues - just assume for a moment the extra payroll allows you to carry giambi as a bench player).
Christ
No.
As purely a DH in Yankee Stadium, I would anticpate more PAs, and as good if not better numbers. Hate they guy? Fine. You said 'He can only hit? What else would you like from a DH? Hell, he might be better then the gimpy, can 'only hit' DH they have over in Boston.
The Yankees would have to get the payroll under $155M next year to get out of the luxury tax. I don't see them getting close to that.
9) how do you know arod is clean? is that a "fact"?
4) you think red sox fans would be upset that we signed bonds? they'd think it hilarious and idiotic. and they'd be right.
Look .... I'm trying to put possible stopgap 3B answers out there .... they ain't perfect .... that's why they are "stopgap".
The Yanks won championships with Charlie Hayes, Scott Brosius and an aging Wade Boggs at 3B. Isn't it within the realm of possibilty that, absent acquiring a Cabrera or Beltre, that a "stopgap" with credible defense and at least SOME offense potential (even low avg. and decent pop)
So, unless you have a much more logical suggestion .... tone down the dismissal of my thought .... ok?
I don't know, but a quick scan through the ML ranks suggest that such a creature may be relatively hard/costly to find. Really, what's available.
I think Cashman will have to stick Betemit at third and hope for the best, or he makes a play for someone like Tejada--short term contract only, and hope he moves over to third.
What is Troy Glaus' contract situation in Toronto?
Perhaps my "Christ No" isn't clear enough.
I can't stand Ty Cobbington. He thinks he's Ted Williams and plays...not like him.
281 Giambi would no doubt waive the no trade if his option for '09 were picked up (no doubt the yanks would have to pick up 2/3 or so of the total contract).
Next option?
Look, obviously it is possible to win a WS without having the best player in baseball as your third baseman (since every WS winner since I've been alive has done that). Just as obviously, A-Rod contributes a fistful of wins to the team, and those are going to be hard to replace.
Here's an interesting question. Are we about to see a Change of Philosophy, according to which the Yankee FO will think harder about how to win in the post-season, and not worry quite as much about racking up as many expected wins in the regular season as possible?
1b - ?
2b - cano
ss - jeter
3b - ?
lf - damon
cf - melky
rf - abreu (*)
dh - matsui
bring back posada and abreu, and this can still be a very good offense ..
Which begs the question: does winning "in the post-season" require something different than winning "in the regular season"? If so, what? Clutchness? Having Been There Before? Octoberness? Concetration?
Cnt Player OPS PA Year Age
+----+-----------------+-----+---+----+---+
1 Alex Rodriguez 1.067 708 2007 31
2 Chipper Jones 1.029 600 2007 35
3 Ryan Braun 1.004 492 2007 23
4 Miguel Cabrera .966 680 2007 24
5 David Wright .962 711 2007 24
6 Aramis Ramirez .915 558 2007 29
7 Hank Blalock .901 232 2007 26
8 Mike Lowell .879 653 2007 33
9 Garrett Atkins .853 684 2007 27
10 Mark Reynolds .844 414 2007 23
11 Troy Glaus .839 456 2007 30
12 Chone Figgins .825 503 2007 29
13 Adrian Beltre .801 639 2007 28
14 Edwin Encarnacion .794 556 2007 24
15 Jack Hannahan .793 169 2007 27
16 Ryan Zimmerman .788 722 2007 22
17 Josh Fields .788 418 2007 24
18 Kevin Kouzmanoff .786 534 2007 25
19 Casey Blake .776 662 2007 33
20 Akinori Iwamura .770 559 2007 28
21 Melvin Mora .759 527 2007 35
22 Jose Bautista .753 614 2007 26
23 Eric Chavez .752 379 2007 29
24 Travis Metcalf .742 181 2007 24
25 Scott Rolen .729 441 2007 32
26 Alex Gordon .725 600 2007 23
27 Morgan Ensberg .724 324 2007 31
28 Pedro Feliz .708 590 2007 32
29 Brandon Inge .688 577 2007 30
30 Ramon Vazquez .673 345 2007 30
31 Abraham Nunez .600 287 2007 31
32 Joe Crede .575 178 2007 29
33 Nick Punto .562 536 2007 29
You can pound lousy teams into submission in the regular season. Its harder in the playoffs.
284 Exactly. The point isn't whether a team can win with a so-so 3B; it's whether you can replace Alex Rodriguez with that so-so 3B and still win. Adding a 1B who'll hit 25 HR won't do it.
Next option?"
somebody shoots giambi.
The bp.com gang has basically proven that the short series of post-season baseball is a basic crapshoot, though they have pointed out that teams with great starters and solid defense tend to have the edge (all other things being equal).
Maybe our issues are not position players. We could put Betemin at 3rd ala Brosius. If Andy comes back and we can get 1 good SP, we have a pretty dominating SP staff, don't we?
Even without ARod, we still have a well above offense, no? I think Melky, with his glove and especially his arm, have showed us that defense saves/wins games. Maybe continuing to chase big bats at the cost of defense is not the best idea?
Question: If Joba and Phil are what we expect, how does a staff of: Wang, Pettitte, Phil, Joba, Moose and IPK stack up to the rest of the AL? What other name could be in there to make that really juicey?
306 I think 'proven' is too strong. I know that's the received wisdom among geeks (and I use that term with great affection).
Is the magnitude of this edge believed to be bigger in the post season than in the regular?
Livan Hernandez? Is he worth paying? (He's a free agent.)
...but given the alternatives, who knows?
Here's a trend that looks real (as opposed to a small sample illusion). The teams that hit way above league average (like the NYY) seem to lose a huge amount of that advantage against strong starters. That is to say, it looks like a lot of the hitting advantage comes from 'fattening up on weak pitching'. A-Rod and Giambi do that really well. And then when they face top twenty pitchers, they're much more like ordinary MLB hitters -- the difference doesn't completely disappear but it shrinks like crazy.
Not that I want him.
This is all just marginal probabilities and expectations, need I add, not a sure thing.
312 Good point about the Mitchell report. It might not be a bad idea to wait until it's released and see what names are there to avoid. When is its release date anyway?
Basically, you're asking how to devise a team that would lose 3 more regular season games in exchange for 3 postseason wins. I have no idea how you do that. Strong 1-3 pitchers? Sure, but that wins games all the time. Everyone wants strong 1-3 pitchers if you can get them.
And even then, the postseason is largely a crapshoot. Detroit had a much, much better rotation than the Cardinals - except for those few days.
The offense is probably going to be formidable--especially if Abreu plays a whole season and Cano improves--but there is a lot of room for aging and regression as well.
Question: does ARod get to keep his pet midges, or are they property of the NY Yankees now?
could be any second now.
Yes, strong 1-3 does help in the regular season, too. But I'm suggesting (based on admittedly sketchy evidence) that it is more helpful in the post-season. So, spend less on hitters, more on top-of-the-line pitching, and you'll miss the play-offs from time to time but have a better shot at the whole ball of wax.
you're my MVP and a first ballot HOFer.
We all know that following the 2006 Cardinals recipe for winning the WS is nuts. If you can even call it a recipe.
If you've decided to settle for your typical four or five starter (middling to poor pitcher than eats some innings) I'd rather just call up the DeSalvo's of the world than spend money or resources to get that non production.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7386758
If true, I wouldn't mind seeing a 1 year suspension for the player, agent and owner involved. . .
340 There's something to that, yeah.
And the problem certainly isn't that they didn't spend enough on pitchers.
344 Yes. Oswalt's injury tendencies also scare the heck out of me.
342 Now we have to hope Bud is really pissed about the mid-Serious announcement, so he'll actually, you know, enforce the rules.
Of course, you're right that it's not just a matter of deciding to get top flight starting pitching. It has to be available for what you have to offer. But the same is true for all-star batters, and we got those.
Sabathia PS: 8.80 ERA
Carmona was killer against us, but 7.20 ERA total PS.
Westbrook: 5.60 ERA
Byrd: 3.60 ERA (HGH enhanced?)
Yeah, great pitching is a key, but it has to show up. If Wang shows up and the midges don't, I still say we beat Cleveland.
Almost any MLB team can beat another team in a 5, or even 7 game series. Didn't we take 5 of 5 from Boston in Fenway that same year TB took 3 of 3 from us at Yankee Stadium? Any one series is a crapshoot. It's just that over the regular season (large sample size(, it evens out, and the better teams (and therefore better odds) typically win.
However, I thought the Mets had the best team in the NL and missed the PS. Shit happens.
The Sox played MUCH better in the PS, against top teams, then during the season.
I will say this about the Sox. For almost every player, in every AB, they looked relaxed. They looked like they knew they would win. I saw no panic or concern, ever. It pissed me off.
350 Too much replacement cost to give up Melky to get someone who needs a huge extension. And the options for free agent CFs are blah. All will want big bucks for many years. I feel like we were just talking about not going after hitters with those kinds of deals . . .
;)
I will say this about the Sox. For almost every player, in every AB, they looked relaxed. They looked like they knew they would win. I saw no panic or concern, ever. It pissed me off.*
I'm with you there man. In start contract to our boys squeezing the 'dust outta the bats. This might just be sentiment and mumbo jumbo, but i think the postseason streak has so inflated expectations and pressure, it's been crushing. Bats this & last year, and inflicted Wang this PS even, he was over matched trying to be Johan Santana when he really just needed to be the Wanger. I know, i know, wishy washy tree hugging sentiment, but it sure seemed to be all over their faces.
can you remember the last time, as a Yankees fan, you felt like this? Chaos, uncertainty? Maybe after the SP exodus of 2003.
I just try and picture the 2008 Yanks, worst case scenario:
C Molina
1b Duncan?
2b Cano
3b Betemit
SS Jeter
RF Damon
LF Matsui
CF Melky
DH Giambi
SP Wang, Hughes, Mussina, Chamberlain, IPK
RP Farnsworth, Veras, Ohlendorf, Britton ???
Bench Wil Nieves and ???????
Still, my New Philosophy idea would be to pass on the 1B who can hit and go after the next very promising starting pitcher. So, you give up 30 runs this year. But next year you win a couple of extra post-season games. Good deal?
In the end, of course, there's a whole lot of luck involved. Who predicted that between Beckett and Willis, it would be Beckett who'd be the coveted ace in 2007? I do worry that my approach would have sold the farm system to get Willis. Ugh.
But is it really either/or for the Yankees? Can't they inevitably afford both?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=5674
They also took shots with Drew and Lugo, and although Drew did hit in late October, I think overall those moves were pretty awful.
So maybe we should look for some high up-side pitchers who might turn out to be mediocre? What about taking a crack at Gagne?
This is not a rhetorical question: Have there been any quality (decent #1 type) free agent pitchers after 2003?
Save for Andy Pettitte, who we got.
There have been great bats on the free agent market, but I can't think of any impact pitchers that the Yanks really missed on. Pedro was no difference maker.
So I guess that means looking at trading prospects or else trying for a Japanese or Cuban FA pitcher. As to the first, should we be stepping up big time for Santana?
Maybe the Yankees should have bid $75M or $100M just to make sure they outdid Boston. But I can't kill them for that one.
On the other hand, the Giants decided to make it a priority to get a #1 starter. They overpaid for Barry Zito.
this needs to be mentioned, 1,000 times
369 Exactly. And for the Yankees, it's the only sensible approach in the draft. We just don't need any 107 OPS+ outfielders, etc. Except as trade bait.
But man, this really means Johan is going to fucking clean up.
So has Theo just been lucky? Does he ultimately have the same approach as Cashman, but with a somewhat lighter checkbook, and he just struck one or two rich veins?
If the kids can pitch well next year and develop this team can still be very good. The '96-'03 Yankees were about pitching. We didn't win because we had Scott Brosius, we won despite him because we had pitchers like Key, Cone, Wells and Clemens. If you look at the ERA+s for 1996-2003 and 2003-present you see a huge gap. In the first era we had one year that was close to average (2001-101) which was largely a factor of Cone imploding. Every other year was very good to excellent. Since then we've had one year above 100, and that was 2005 with a 102 or so.
If we go back to that model, I think this team will be more competitive in both the regular and postseason. Sure it'd be nice to have A-Rod around and still score 900+ runs with a juggernaut of a team. I remain convinced that with a decent 3B, and some marked improvement from 1B and a better bullpen (most likely from within) this can be a very competitive team.
Look at it this way, the Red Sox this year had only a team OPS+ of 107, compared to the 123 put up by the Yankees. The difference? A 123 ERA+ to a 99.
313 It's all the "..." People seem to be using them in excess today.
I mean, in excess today...
Manny is ripe for decline. Seriously. I'll be shocked if he doesn't slide next year. Now, a declining Manny is still a good hitter, but it just looks very likely that they lose production.
375 Will Johan really clean up? He has to follow the Twins' FO lead. They won't trade him except for serious goods. That means Santana can't just look for the best $$$.
Or are you thinking he might sit tight on his contract, no matter what the Twins do, and aim for free agency? In that case he sure does clean up, barring major problems between now and next year.
Here's a formula that might work.
7 of 9 position players have a better OPS in the PS then during the year. Then throw in a little used Rookie, and he posts a .950 OPS.
chamberlain could be that guy. heck, IPK or Hughes could be too. most teams have to wait and see with their young pitchers, the Yankees usually don't give them a chance; not that I'm rooting for Westbrook, Halsey, Milton and Brandon Claussen to come back home.
Dice-K is still adjusting to the majors.. he's probly the best japanese pitcher to ever come play here, and will only get better
Pedroia is their Derek Jeter .. a great average hitter, clutch, and spark plug type guy .. not to mention he can play 2B or SS, giving the sox some nice options in the next DECADE
Ellsbury is the real deal, not a flash .. he was drafted to replace Damon and i think their scouts knew what they were doing with this one
Lester is still a very promising looking 23 year old pitcher
then theres Papelbon, and a crafty GM ...
BECKETT, MANNY, ORTIZ
the sox look great, just be jealous dammit... they did a good job
Bartolo Colon
Paul Lo Duca
Sammy Sosa
The Newest and Probably Last Incarnation of David Wells
Victor Zambrano
Geoff BLummmmmarghhhhhhhhhhblhahaha!
Does this year's FA class of pitchers expect to be paid in the $17M/year range?? I find it hard to believe. Surely no high-rolling clubs are going to dish out mega$ to these guys.
Robbie Cano did a radio show today. He found out that A-Rod opted out from one of this friends. Alex didn't even call a teammate he claimed to care so much about. Class guy.
... A-Rod was busy collecting his Silver Slugger award in Colorado ... oh wait ...
The Yankees are on the right track, but a few years behind Boston in terms of developing talent.
I wonder if we have reached a new 'ceiling' point in respect to FAs. It really seems, like in the old days, developing talent from within is the answer. Yes, having money to augment a lineup with some high priced FAs will be helpful, but you can't build a team around them, nor make up for lack of a farm.
I think Cashman sees this... Big Stein, into instant gratification, did not.
Besides, who would you replace Damon with right now? (And why would Atlanta be silly enough to believe Damon can actually, you know, still play CF?)
406 The Yanks will definitely offer arbitration to A-Rod.
Here is wisdom.
Why is the current discussion so much more rational than the Joe Torre discussion?
Discuss.
Please.
And we'll all join in, but we'll know and admit to ourselves and each other that A-Rod is getting screwed by the press yet again. That will be fun.
I don't think anybody loves Arod right now.
The Yankees, however, are where the Sox were last year, in that the young players are just getting to the majors ready to make an impact. Hughes, Joba, Kennedy, Gardner, Melancon, Ohlie, Edwar are poised to make an impact, but it might be another season before we really see that pay off (and there are a lot more on the way, mind you). Add that to a likely trade along the lines of the Beckett one (at least for some blue chip prospects or so) and the Yankees are just like you said, a year or two behind.
The big difference being that a) the Yankees already have the likes of Melky, Wang and Cano up there, and b) have a lot more in the farm system to work with...
A-Rod was awesome and all, but its not the same. Even those of us who were his biggest supporters (like me) are only too happy to figure out a rational way to improve the team without the guy who didn't want to stay.
I won't make the last obvious point, because I refuse to re-start the damned Torre repeating.
Oh shit, I hope I didn't open that again.
So, there must be ways to employ the gigantic $$$ advantage to make the farm system awesome, right? One way is to grab guys from obscure places around the world, because we can pay for the scouting. Another is to draft the risky, high ceiling players and sign them, which other teams can't afford to do because of the probability that they're ultimately worthless. Any other tactics?
http://tinyurl.com/3dx9vh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVS04n3Q3mI
I have this dim recollection that I used to care about what Peter Gammons said.
Ever since he ran for "President of RSN", I just don't care so much anymore.
Was A-Rod more headaches than he was worth?
I never listened to a thing he said again.
They sort of seem fake now, in retrospect, but some of those moments he had with Robby and Melky throughout the year were also worth a lot.
Screw the headaches.
Personally, I liked ARod every moment he was a Yankee and think that the media and NY fans didn't appreciate him. Granted he may not be appreciated anywhere, but the ARod love/hate relationship was getting ridiculous. I was hoping he opted out and was a SS again. I don't blame him for not wanting to play in front of a bunch of fair-weather entitled fans. Like with Torre, I think this is good for both parties. The Yanks need to figure out how to win without having 25% of their budget on 2 players and fix their pitching to get to Boston's level.
1. All that "want to be a Yankee 4 evah!" nonsense was nonsense.
2. The money's probably not the issue, otherwise why opt out -- we'd pay him more than anyone?
3. A-Rod can be a bit of a delicate flower.
The way I see it, it's probably a personal decision for A-Rod. If I had to guess (and I do) our newest pariah signed in the hopes of getting a WS ring for his trouble and gave himself a horizon. He doesn't see the '08 Yankees with or w/o A-Rod as a WS team, and has gotten tired of the pressure cooker that is NYC. I think he's looking to go somewhere he'll be appreciated and not have to deal with the invasiveness of the NY sports media. He didn't handle it well, but I think if you read between the lines a little, that's what's going on -- if he's not going to win a WS, he's not going to put up with the crap he's had to put up with.
Then again, there's option B) he's a complete and utter ass. ATM, I'm leaning towards that explanation.
I think it's a little of both.
1b - Duncan
2b - Cano
SS - Jeter
3b - Acquire Wright from Mets in Daring Midnight Raid!
C - Posada
LF - Matsui
CF - Cabrera
RF - Abreu
DH - Damon/Giambi
Let it ride, baby.
But yeah, the Yanks have been taking advantage of this tactic a while now, drafting guys and paying them well above slot (i.e. Brackman, Suttle). I believe one of the trio of Joba, Phil or Kennedy also fell into the above-slot category. These are talented guys who slip because other teams are scared of signability.
I think the best example is Betances.
Talk about an equation that doesn't balance, huh?
Derek Jeter: My favorite player forever.
But, it's probably a bogus explanation. If he's concerned, why doesn't he just pick up the phone.
From Lohud.
To be fair, of course, Robinson Cano isn't Alex Rodriguez, so we can't reasonably expect Alex to give a shit about him.
Michel Kaye LIVE right now
Though I do believe that is some of the nonsense he is spitting out - I am also tired of all these guys' "friends" though.
(And with that, I retire that expression from my own personal use. To me it is now 134 .)
;-)
Gotta go. I'll check in later to get the answer to your mystery.
My two cents, but I think yesterday was more about Boras than A-Rod. Boras doesn't like a situation where he has only one team bidding for his player's services. I don't think he or A-Rod are convinced that the Yankees' "buh-bye" is real. I think Boras wants the Yankees' in the bidding, or else the market for A-Rod might be artificially depressed.
It's a gamble on Boras' part, but he rarely loses.
"I received a message from Scott Boras last night informing me that Alex Rodriguez formally opted out of the final three seasons of his contract. We always understood that it was his contractual right to do so.
We expressed our interest in keeping him in pinstripes, and requested the opportunity to convey those feelings to him directly with the Steinbrenner family in an open, face-to-face dialogue.
Alex was a key part of our success over the last four seasons, and I appreciate having the opportunity to work with him. I wish Alex, Cynthia and their growing family the best of luck in the future. I only wish we could have raised a championship trophy together during his time here, which was the ultimate goal we all shared."
His is "extremely disappointed".
I think Hank's "Obviously he didn't want to be a Yankee" was a far better statement.
It makes its point, that Alex Rodriguez is a jackass, without resorting to any obvious personal attacks.
I hope Pena or Bowa stays as bench coach.
Let's see...Girardi's a catcher, Bowa was an IF...they could use a good OF coach. I don't think they've had one since Mazzilli. We want Chad Curtis!
496 Cashman and Donnie too - not sure if there has been any mention of his statement.
If you believe that the Yankees were bluffing, in part, here is why opting out early makes sense.
The Yankees presumably had a bottom line offer they would make to A-Rod. Had Boras waited until 10 days after the WS, he could have gotten the Yankees to come pretty close to their bottom line number.
At that point it would have been almost impossible -- literally, physically painful -- for the Yankees to turn around after offering their bottom line number and tack on an extra $30M once A-Rod entered free agency.
BUT, because A-Rod opted-out before the Yankees got beyond their initial offer, the Yankees can probably afford to bid more than their starting number and still bid less than their perceived bottom line amount.
Boras may be betting that IF he can convince the Yankees to sit down with him during the free agency period, he will be able to drag them to opening the vault during the negotiations. And the best way to convince the Yankees to sit down is to make it enticing to just enter into discussions. And the best way to do that was to not get the Yankees invested and disappointed in pre-opt-out discussions. Cut to the chase, as it were.
Girardi talking about non-Yankee friends as coaches. Harkee from the Cubs? Don't know the guy.
Olney also said based on all the people he has talked to, it seems more and more as if Torre and the Yankees parting ways was inevitable, and that no one was really insulted.
Every shot of Giradi in FL it looks like he has his cellphone or blackberry clipped to his pants - i really hope he doesn't do that when he is back in pinstripes.
Detroit seems high in the running for ARod.
Brandon Inge anyone?
Remeber that Bernie Williams was a Boras client and was all but signed, sealed, and delivered to Boston until that happy Thanksgiving day announcement.
Career = 85
No and no. Betemit could do that.
If you mean Guillen, then yeah, but he has to accomodate Renteria, who I don't think can play other positions.
Maybe thats wmy Cashman's comment was so 'sweet'. Not burning any bridges... and he didn't mention NOT bidding again on ARod.
Boras is a smart guy. Viz is gone. $50m freed up already.
In other news, I heard that Dick Cheney has decided to declassify who killed Kennedy.
cashman is next
this sh*t has to stop NOW
Is on the Radio Today
And he ain't afraid to Say
What he's thinking
(Of course)
To the tune of Hey Ya!
What fucking moron wrote this song?!?! Why wasn't he fired?!
http://tinyurl.com/3bh5s9
545 but why is he not listed for the 2008 fas?
3B - Blalock
Of course the rational part of my brain looks at an A-Rod, Ortiz, Manny heart of the order and quakes in fear. That team could be the '98 Yankees.
turns out i was half-right:
"club may offer salary arbitration if Rodriguez voids contract 2007-09, but club may not offer salary arbitration after 2010"
2007: Pavano (!), Wang, Pettite, Mussina, Igawa
2008: Wang, Hughes, Chamberlain, Kennedy, Moose, Pettite(?)
C'mon, at least Carl Pavano can't be our opening day starter this year ;). Or has he been progressing through his rehab extra fast?
That could be fun.
579 sounds dangerous - like you could pull a hamstring or something doing that
Maybe you could find better ways to express your anger or disappointment....
I assume most of us make decisions based on what is best for us and our families. I see no reason ARod should not also have that option.
He gave up playing SS to play on the Yankees. We should NOT forget that. NY treated him like shit for 3 years. In many ways, we don't deserve him.
I definitely second your premise. Any Yankee fan who booed Arod for one second shouldn't utter one word of judgement. Now, most here supported him, so that point isn't as relevant. Still, Yankee fans don't have any right to feel betrayed. Having said that, once Arod dons another uniform, I stop actively rooting for him.
"I received a message from Scott Boras last night informing me that Alex Rodriguez formally opted out of the final three seasons of his contract. We always understood that it was his contractual right to do so.
We expressed our interest in keeping him in pinstripes, and requested the opportunity to convey those feelings to him directly with the Steinbrenner family in an open, face-to-face dialogue.
Alex was a key part of our success over the last four seasons, and I appreciate having the opportunity to work with him. I wish Alex, Cynthia and their growing family the best of luck in the future. I only wish we could have raised a championship trophy together during his time here, which was the ultimate goal we all shared."
And what about this wasn't misleading?
And I'm sorry, every baseball player does not interrupt the world series so they can be the center of attention. Again.
i'm glad it's girardi over mattingly, but it's sad how hurt and disappointed donnie baseball is. perhaps he'll be torre's bench coach in LA. would be something if A-Hole ends up w/ the Halos and Torre w/ the Dodgers...
The fact is the guy is a narcicist. Numbers do not a good human being make. It doesn't mean he's not a great player. It does however mean that when you do what he just did in the way that you did it, the timing of it, you are a selfish person who needs attention. Good ridance. Letting Boston enjoy the spotlight for a few days would not have affected his free agency one bit, and for that I say get lost! At least Barry is openly a selfish ass hole, while Alex wants to have his cake and eat it too. Here is to hoping his name is in the Mitchell report.
When your have twice as many K's as base hits in your career post-season, you aren't a Yankee anyway. He isn't worthy of carrying Manny Ramirez's laundry bag.
Who are you, or anyone here, who know nothing and still pass judgement?
; )
Tigers now do not need a SS, but the Braves do. Alex in Atlanta?
"The fact is the guy is a narcicist".
Well... I certanly don't want to question your professional judgement... so I'll assume it's true. And... So what? Should he be perfect like you and me? You mean you can actually find personality faults with him? Really? Gee... if only he could be more like you.
We are fans. We have a 'right' to criticize a players performance on the field. But when did we become the Karmic and moral judges of these athletes? People that we know absolutely nothing about, except when we see in the news.
When 1000 people are sticking mics in your face, asking questions that are impossible to answer, what should he say? He will be crucified regardless.
He said he loves NY and playing here. That may be true. Maybe it's not. Who cares? We don't know if his wife, or any one of 100 other events influenced his decision. He still may resign with the Yankees.
While 25 year old Miggy is pounding down RingDings, ARod lost weight and body fat over the winter, overcame his 2006 issues, and treated us to an outstanding, historic year. He owes you and me nothing.
The man spends his life under a microscope. Maybe WE OWE HIM a little respect. He has earned it.
593 So? Then they're all greedy POS.
605 Too expensive. Plus, I think they care very much about clubhouse culture down there.
612 yeah, pete's got some good stuff up right now...
612 yeah, pete's got some good stuff up right now...
He's gone out of his way for four years to make this team a circus. What respect do we owe him?
I agree about the Toronto thing. I actually dont care if he and his wife are swingers, or if he cheats on her while she's tied up. What I do care about is that he screwed us, screwed the Red Sox, screwed tradition by announcing when he did, and screwed us by being no better than David Eckstein when the shit was on the line. To who much is given, much is expected. Is that wrong?
Never mind that the Yankees were ready to give him 180 million dollars.
"We were very disappointed that Scott Boras would try to upstage our premier baseball event of the season with his announcement. There was no reason to make an announcement last night other than to try to put his selfish interests and that of one individual player above the overall good of the game.
Last night and today belong to the Boston Red Sox, who should be celebrated for their achievement, and to the Colorado Rockies, who made such an unbelievable run to the World Series."
=================
What he said ...
Hmmm...if 2007's slogan was Ha!, I propose that 2008's theme be We!
Part of the game? Yeah, MLB releases statements every time someone files for free agency.
But if dissing ARod makes you feel better, knock yourself out.
Do you think everyone's a saint, or just people in Yankee uniforms?
As the Yankees reminded us so clearly in l'affaire Torre, this is a business. Put aside the anger, the outrage, the woulda, coulda, shoulda. The Yankees have no proprietary claim on Rodriguez; he had the right to declare free agency, just as Posada and Rivera do, and he exercised it.
Consider this:
1. The Yankees desperately need a third baseman.
2. The Yankees desperately need a legitimate righty power threat, and a cleanup hitter.
3. Alex Rodriguez is a free agent.
Strip it down to those basics, and it's utterly foolish for the Yankees not to pursue him. Swallow your pride, boys; business is business.
And again, this is not part of the game. Its so not part of the game that Bob DuPuy released a scathing statement.
And Cano said it for himself.
"Responding to the revelation, Rodriguez's agent, Scott Boras, confirmed he sent word of the opt-out decision in writing Sunday to the Yankees and expected the club to receive it by Monday. Boras also left phone and text messages with the same information for Yankees general manager Brian Cashman."
However, not very conclusive one way or the other. Certainly, Cashman should have been told as soon as it happened.
Boras sent the letter. WHO exactly told the press?
He is required to discuss these decisions with Arod, it's that simple. He did, they did, and the decision was made. You can defend his play, I respect that. But to think a decision affecting a 300 million decision was made in the dark, you're smoking too much meth.
Rodriguez was under contract - a contract that gave him the right to declare free agency. He did. Rivera's contract and Posada's contract gave them the same right.
I don't stand in judgement of the TYPE of PEOPLE these ballplayers are, based on contract gamesmanship.
Why do you need to pass such harsh judgement?
I blame him for insulting our intelligence with things like "He was worried about the state of the team" and "He really wanted to stay a Yankee."
But, according to you, Scott Boras FORCED Alex Rodriguez to ignore the Yankees. He FORCED him to upstage the Series. Did he force him to blow off Cano?
If A-Rod has any intention of staying with the Yankees, then obviously he should have attempted to work out terms while the Rangers would have been on the hook for millions. They could have asked the Yanks to split the Texas money, for instance, paying Alex $12M more than he could get from another team.
He didn't do that. If the Yankees were to re-sign him, they would be paying him and also Texas. That makes no sense at all, Boras knows it, A-Rod knows it.
Therefore, A-Rod has no intention of signing up with the Yankees again. Therefore, there is no reason for Cashman to make a bid of any kind.
You can't take bullshit too seriously, especially not when it's said as part of a negotiation. He wants to keep his options open, and I can't blame him for that.
As for anything relevant to the conversation, I'm saving my fingertips until every and all "facts" are on the table for scrutiny. However if you want an emotional response, I'll be glad to give it serious consideration... (um, don't look yet, I'll let you know)
I have no idea what Rodriguez's intentions are. I'm only talking about what the Yankees should do, and what they should do is put all that nonsense aside. The Texas subsidy is gone. For the last few years they've had a superstar third baseman at bargain basement prices, and now they don't. In fact, they don't have any third baseman, and they don't have a cleanup hitter.
And Alex Rodriguez is a free agent. If he had been playing in Boston the last 4 years and did the same thing, would you want the Yankees to pursue him?
Uh. Explain the difference.
"I have no idea what Rodriguez's intentions are."
I just gave an argument that he has no intention of re-signing with the Yankees. What's your response to that argument?
"If he had been playing in Boston the last 4 years and did the same thing, would you want the Yankees to pursue him?"
Of course. Unless there were good evidence that he had no intention of signing with the Yankees.
He's not a FA until after 09. They make it sound like Melky, Phil, and a fringe pitcher would get it done.
In practice, agents do NOT consult with clients on every aspect or detail of the deal in real time. They have to know in general what you want, what you'll settle for, what's not good enough, etc. so that they can negotiate effectively instead of saying "I'll get back to you."
Similarly, in acting as a mouthpiece, Boras may have said "Look, Alex, since we agree that you will opt out, I'm going to make an announcement." A-Rod says sure, that seems like a good idea. But the timing and phrasing may have been all Boras.
We don't really know what happened, of course, but it's not totally out of the realm that A-Rod really is blameless in terms of releasing the news.
I don't need a response. What you've said may be reasonable, but it's also pure speculation. I repeat: I have no idea what his intentions are. Your interpretation of his intentions don't really shed any light.
I wouldn't care if it looked like he wanted to sign with the Yankees or not. I'd make him an offer he couldn't refuse.
Also, I think there is a part of the Yankees that thinks the baggage of Arod has actually been a distraction. Maybe, just maybe, all the scrutiny he received in the playoffs does distract the team. Heck...maybe Cashman just wants to change the Karma. Whatever the reason, I think there is a part of the Yankees that wants Arod, but also doesn't want him (kind of like Torre). I know it's easier when things are defined in black and white, but usually it is the gray area where one finds the truth.
2. You know that isn't the way it works in real life. I want $100. My agent or agent agent/lawyer asks for $100. The counter is $50. My agent doesn't run right back and say "They offered $50." He tries to negotiate up first.
As disappointed as I am, I'm a WE bit excited. I have faith in Cashman and his pack of stat nerds that apparently follows him around.
"The Yankees aren't paying Texas anything because there's no money going from the Yankees to Texas. I thought that was pretty self-explanatory."
I still don't get it. How is it any different, economically speaking, from paying money to Texas?
Here are two circumstances:
(a) Texas is paying the Yankees money, and then they stop.
(b) Nobody is paying anybody money, and then the Yankees start paying money to Texas.
These are identical economically speaking. They may be different psychologically, but I think that's irrelevant.
"I don't need a response. What you've said may be reasonable, but it's also pure speculation."
Sorry, I still don't get it. I gave an argument. The conclusion of the argument is that he has no intention of signing with the Yankees. Maybe you think the premises of my argument are incorrect, or maybe you think the conclusion doesn't follow, but in neither case is what I said "pure speculation", so I simply don't understand your response (or your reason for thinking you don't have to give a response to my argument).
"I repeat: I have no idea what his intentions are. Your interpretation of his intentions don't really shed any light."
What interpretation?
I gave an argument. I'd love to hear your response, if you have one.
"I wouldn't care if it looked like he wanted to sign with the Yankees or not. I'd make him an offer he couldn't refuse."
That would be a bad idea. The result would be: he wouldn't sign anyway, and you (Cashman) would lose all credibility in future negotiations, having insisted publicly that you wouldn't negotiate, but then caving.
Then again, maybe Cashman will spend a billion dollars on Andruw Jones, in which case the only winners will be the proprietors of strip clubs across Manhattan.
You're paying someone $500 a week. I agree to pick up $100 of it. The person quits. Are you them paying me $100/week? It makes no sense at all.
And what happens next time, if the Yankees say the same thing? Either they'll stick to it or they won't, depending on what suits their best interests. It clearly suited their interests to say that all through the season; I'm not sure that it's in their best interest to stick to it.
I give an argument, with some premises and a conclusion. If you think it's wrong, you're supposed to say whether the premises are wrong or the conclusion doesn't follow.
You apparently have a different idea of how it works: I give an argument, and your reply is that it's pure speculation. Our ideas of how this works are so different that I think there's no point in continuing.
As for the purely economic point:
it's not complicated or weird at all. The Yankees giving up a Texas subsidy is exactly the same, economically, as the Yankees paying cash to Texas. If A-Rod were to re-sign with the Yankees, the result would be that they have given up a subsidy, which is exactly the same as the result that they just write a check and give it to the Rangers. There's no difference at all in the finance. If you think there's a difference, I'd like to hear what it is.
Also, I love that MLBTraderumors uses Pete as a source. I bet Pete himself would admit he pulls half his stuff out his ass.
What should he say? When everything he says lands him on the cover of a magazine? Truth, lie or anything in between, the press makes a story out of everything he says and does.
I just don't know what you expect him to say.
The 'negotiating with terrorists' bit is the cost. If there were a big potential benefit to doing it, I could see it -- after all, Cashman's reputation among agents has some, but not enormous value.
But I can't see the benefit. Opting out without negotiating has a large deadweight loss, since whatever the Yankees are willing to pay, Boras could have got that plus the Rangers' premium (or a share of it) by negotiating an extension. Boras knows this, the Yankees know he knows it, etc. So opting out makes sense only if A-Rod is going to sign somewhere else. So, there's no benefit for Cashman in getting back into the game.
The exception is if it suddenly looks like Boras realizes that he (and A-Rod) have made a huge miscalculation. Then it could be worth jumping back in.
WWDJD? Keep it simple, stupid. Fans don't want controversy.
Also, no response to 658 , I see.
Boras and ARod (I would guess) agree on marketing strategy. However, my guess is ARod tends more to play baseball and Boras tends to play more hardball (HA!).
Its just a guess. I wasn't there. Were you?
I'm goinf to drop out if this debate now with these parting words.
You guys need to watch more 'Kung Fu'. (HA!)
705 More importantly, do you actually think that the "State of the Yankees" was the reason Arod opted out? Your post, to me, implies that you do. If that's why, then couldn't he have waited, I don't know, 24 hours? He left literally the second he could!
Where I do agree with you 100% is I hold absolutely no ill will toward Arod. Will I still root for him as I did Clemens when he left? No. Will I root against him though? Absolutely not (unless he signs with a major competitor).
We're just too damned badass, that's our problem. Let's head over to Dodger Thoughts and whip their intellectual butts now.
Now the question is whether the Yankees want to pay Rodriguez or not. If they do so, they're not "paying Texas" any more than if they don't sign him. The Texas deal is completed before any Rodriguez contract exists. They're separate. They have nothing to do with each other.
I'm not going to debate you over someone else's thoughts. It's not open to debate, because we don't have enough information, and thoughts can't be proven by "reasoned argument." I'm perfectly open to "reasoned argument" on a subject that's open to it. But however reasonable your argument may seem, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HE'S THINKING and you can't demonstrate it through argumentation.
And now I'm so done with this.
Torre was seriously disrespected!!!!
Nah. My heart's not in that one anymore.
That contract is gone. Texas has the money no matter what happens, and it doesn't cost the Yankees a cent. That's why I don't consider it a payment, because it doesn't cost the Yankees anything. That transaction is over, finished, done.
Now that A-Rod has opted out, it's done. Had he not, it wouldn't have been. That's the deadweight loss, if A-Rod were to re-sign with the Yankees. That's the money lost, but only if he re-signs.
As to the other stuff, right, I got that the first time. I'm just disappointed that you wouldn't say what was wrong with the premises or the reasoning.
And I'm pretty well aware 712 that I don't exactly have the knack for trash talk, thank you very much.
658 At the moment, I see two parties on the flip side of the same coin. Neither one of them handled what may actually have been necessary in the long run with much grace and tact, and fans like us will react given what little we actually know. That's not to excuse the more feral comments we've made and in retrospect, I'm willing to give the entire matter more consideration, so I'm waiting until everything is on the table before I draw any serious conclusion. Meanwhile, devil's advocate, like shaving, can be fun! 8)p
Well, anyway, if you could see me... I don't look all that much like Allen Iverson. Surprise!
OK, I feel like I have thoroughly stated my views on this whole situation. I will now focus on what's next for Cashman and Girardi. In other words, I'm not here to talk about the past.
Ohhhh. McGwire.
JG will have entire control over picking the new staff, I think.
Well, Guidry and Bowa are leaving. I'd think Girardi would keep Long and Pena, for some continuity, and maybe Pena gets promoted. But what do I know?
Nujo can't come in trying to push the same buttons (which is what Torre meant when he said whomever took his spot needs to 'be himself'), and he doesn't seem likely to do so. What will be interesting is how he reacts to the inevitable front-office meddling. Say George or Hank or whoever does lay off him for the first couple of years and Girardi delivers a WS within that time. How likely do you think that either one of them will want to insert themselves into the higher end of cause and effect of winning the championship, and how strong will Girardi's action (not to say his re-action) be to explain that as far as winning goes, George/FO are the facilitators and not the warriors? I'm guessing that if Nujo's the strong leader they said they want, they'll attempt to test his authority and not succeed. Will they leave him alone after that? George, no; Cash, yes, King of the Hill, n/a...
I can't wait to meet his staff and get a feel for the Yankees of the 21st century. Or atleast for the next couple of years!
Helluva way to start out the new era, that's for sure. Joe interviews (very well at that) and forces the team to choose him over a team legend who's feelings are now very hurt and might just pull a Yogi for a while, then after A-Rod bolts the very second he can, Joe turns them down? That would be ten kinds of hilarious, half of which would have anyone burning in hell if they laughed, but with the way things have been going for Team Hankenstein, I wouldn't be surprised...
love your "omgomg-omg!" happy though >;)
PeteAbe: (via LoHud) Dodgers have announced that former Yankees skipper Joe Torre will be taking the reigns of the former Brooklyn Dodgers, making this a home-away-from-homecoming of sorts...
Weeping: HA HA HA HA HA AHA HA HA HAHA HA! That's a good one, Pete! Joe managing the Dodgers!
(cricket, cricket...)
Weeping: Tell me that was a joke...
Jon Weisman: Welcome to Hell, kid...
>;) (shoutout to S. Adams and Dilbert)
I see no reason to argue your premises or conclusions. It's not arguable.
I can't believe how it worked out. Proctor is probably crying up a river right now.
We only have access to a tiny visible portion of what's going on outside his head. Any conclusions we draw about what's going on inside from such flimsy and incomplete evidence are, well, speculation rather than reasoned argument.
Exactly what I said in the DT thread.
I am just wondering if I should fear that I am about to lose a chunk of our young players.
Beckham has played part of one season and been hurt. A-Rod hasn't even signed with another team yet.
I'd wait a bit before trying to sell that trend piece if I were you.
Its funny, he just shook the impression that he was greedy, and now he's right back there. I would have to say he is quite greedy.
772 Just what I was thinking. Oh well, g'nite everyone! Zzzzz...
i doubt the cubs, because of the ownership issues, i doubt the red sox because i think they'll work something agreeable out with lowell and save themselves the whole a-ras pain in the ass ...
dark horses?
I can sort-of agree with you on this one, Van. How about that!
I THINK that in this case the Yanks get a sandwich pick. Anyone else know for sure?
Arod clearly handles pressure poorly, so perhaps signing with LA is best for him. But if what he wants is a big stage and WS titles, then anything west of the Mississippi is a bad idea.
769 weird day, indeed. strange things are afoot at the Circle-K...
Isn't it kind of unclear WHAT he wants? I mean, he may get more $ by opting out. But unless he goes to the Sox, who of all his options seems like good WS bets?
We may never know for sure. I think he must have wanted to get out of NY. Whether it was the fans, or his teammates, or the tabloids, all three, whatever, he'd had it.
If he has the chance to coach in Dodgerland, he should take it in a heartbeat, if only to fulfill his (supposed) dream of one day managing the Yankees. In three or four or five years, after Girardi gets canned or burns out, Mattingly will be an ideal candidate.
I guess the other way he could go wuld be to look for the same total amount (say 250 million) spread over another very long contract--like 10 years.
I don't know. The Yankees have the most resources, a new stadium on the way, lots of money coming off the books in the coming years, and they had the Texas subsidy. I'm just not sure other teams can compete with what the Yankees could/would put on the table.
This leads me to conclude that 1] he thought the Yankees were bluffing and expects them to enter the bidding, or 2] he really just wanted out of NY at any cost (figuring he'll make his dough no matter where he ends up).
As I said at the beginning of this thread...
Puke
ok, I'll post a little flamebait, since it fits my mood:
all of the folks who think they know ANYTHING about the "character" possessed by either Jeter or A-Rod should consider carefullly the fact that ALL of their "knowledge" is filtered through a select group of men, sportwriters: a select group of mostly bitter men who resent & envy the fame and physical prowess of athletes and wait for their boyhood heroes to screw up once so that they can bring them down.
it's a rare player, like Jeter, who seems to be bulletproof for life: and the price he pays seems to involve having never said a remotely interesting thing to a reporter in his ENTIRE FUCKING LIFE.
me, I loved watching Alex do everything (well, except pop flies, and certain post season at bats); same goes for Derek (exception: molassass-footed first step). I don't especially wanna hang out with either of them; I'm not sure either guy would have my back in a tough situation. nor do I care.
ok, that's my two cents worth on this Historic Moment in Yankee History [/emoticon for weary sarcasm here/]
And for the record. Is Scott Boras nuts? Who the fuck at Yankee land used the words transition and patience when referring to the team on the field and not the managerial situation? And 10:30 at night? With ten days to go for the opt-out? Here is to hoping Boras gets rear ended getting on the 5 Freeway tomorrow.
Interesting, no. The man has never had an interesting thought, let alone made an interesting or insightful statement.
When you say Jeter never said anything interesting, what you mean is that Jeter never acted irresponsibly in dragging the clubhouse into the media. He never spoke badly of his skipper. He never spoke ill of those who pay his salary. He never spoke ill of the fans. He never reacted to silly ridiculous speculation from writers who make Abraham look like Walter Cronkite. He never stirred up controversy he knew the team would have to respond to. Yea, what a horrible and uninteresting person he is.
But seriously, what makes you think he will ever be healthy for a prolonged stretch again? expecting a 100% Jason Giambi is like expecting Carl Pavano to start 20 games next season.
Pete Abe on ESPN....Go Pete go!
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.