Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Derek Jeter released a statement this afternoon:
"Out of my great respect for Mr. Torre*, I have refrained from comment until he had a chance to address the public."In my eyes, Joe Torre is more than a Hall of Fame manager. He is a friend for life, and the relationship we have shared has helped shape me in ways that transcend the game of baseball. His class, dignity, and the way he respected those around him from ballplayers to batboys are all qualities that are easy to admire, but difficult to duplicate."
This is classic Jeter. Scripted, predictably bland, but not phony. You get the sense that Jeter really does knows how fortunate he's been, and you know the bond between him and "Mr T" is genuine. Here's the beauty part, which gets to the heart of the matter:
"I have known Mr. Torre for a good majority of my adult life, and there has been no bigger influence on my professional development. It was a privilege to play for him on the field, and an honor to learn from him off the field."
I think that's the truth right there. Jeter, Posada--their baseball father is gone now. I often wonder how Jeter's career will play itself out. I could see him aging poorly, like Cal Ripken in his later years. I hope I'm wrong. Regardless, it will be fascinating to see how he goes about getting along with a new manager next spring. Not that it will necessarily change his game much (and it'll be easy for him if it's Mattingly of Girardi who takes over), just that it will be so new, so different.
Aren't you curious?
* For those of you with HBO, Joe Torre is being interviewed by Bob Costas tonight at 9.
Also, great writeup. Classic Jeter, indeed. He's my favorite.
Does he really consider the day he became an adult the day he started SS for the Yankees?
31-92
32-97
33-107
Derek Jeter AGE-OPS+
31-125
32-132
33-121
It looks like the Captain's aging much better. All those consecutive games really seemed to take a toll on Cal.
Looking at these numbers- wow. Cal was downright mediocre to bad after age 30.
For example, isn't the heart of Olney's argument re the end of the dynasty that the 4-ring vets shut out new guys like Giambi et al, making for a bad clubhouse dynamic?
And, the new manager, sooner rather than later, is going to have to move Jeter from ss -- his fielding was atrocious this season, especially 2nd 1/2 -- and probably not too long after that move Jorge to dh. Think Joba is ever going to be comfortable throwing a slider to Jorge with a runner on?
Also, how is it that these reporters don't ask "what is your managing philosophy; what do you think of the hit & run, squeeze, sac bunt; feelings on reliever usage, etc." Hardly one question about, oh, you know, actual in game baseball decisions. Pete Abe's question was bound to draw a 'pass' because he was essentially asking for a critique on Torre's recent postseason managing. Not one question on OBP or infatuations with base stealers, working the count, etc. Come on guys!
Now, I'm sure the Yankees FO people sure as hell asked him those questions. He sounded exhausted.
It is obviously not typical to have the same manager for the first 12 years of your career and have such a positive bond - the closest recent thing I can think of is Tim Duncan and Greg Popovich and even that is pretty different.
I think it was a nice statement.
6 I think there is something to be said for Olney's argument - maybe its exaggerated but there is something there.
10 I would like to think Mattingly would communicate better with the team, but I cannot see him really ever becoming that comfortable with the media. After hearing Girardi last night, I didn't think there wasy any way for Mattingly to sound good- and poor guy, he didn't.
No questions about if they would use Rivera in a baseloaded situation in the bottom of the 9th in Fenway. How would they handle the young pitching staff? Do they believe in bunting early in a game?
The reporters seemed more interested in being chummy with the prospective managers than anything else.
http://tinyurl.com/yonhwg
So Joe used how great he was in the PS to drive up his price when he was winning then says its a crapshoot when he's losing? Can't have it both ways.
17 I wish the reporters would ask some of the question you mentioned. But something tells me most casual fans don't give a darn about that stuff. We'd use the info to gauge if the new manager gets 'it' - but we aren't casual fans. =)
20 I wonder if Cashman has vetted the candidates the way a White House would vet a nominee for the Court? The White House pretty much knows in advance how a guy is going to vote if they get on the Court (Souter being a rare exception). I feel pretty sure Cash gets 'it', so I'd hope whoever he hires, he'd make damn well sure that person also gets 'it'. We shall see.
http://tinyurl.com/2quzcp
The Sox has the new "gold standard?" I mean, I am freely admitting that the Yankees are hardly the force they were and would be fine saying some other team was the class of the league, but the Sox? He admits in the article that in 2005 they lost in the 1st round and last year took 3rd PLACE! But that doesn't matter. Like most journalism these days in sports, its all selective. He sees 2004 and 2007 (so far) and skips over the rest, declaring the Sox somehow the best organization. Never mind that the Yanks have averaged more wins than the Sox over those years. Never mind that choosing 2004-now is a totally arbitrary cut off. If you went one more year back, than, well, you have the Yankees in the WS. Going back to 2002, you might say that the Angels are the "gold standard."
Never mind that in that same time period the Cardinals made it to the WS twice as well and missed the playoffs but once too.
I love this kind of writing, its just the "I think this and I am going to pick and choose whatever I want to make my point" style of lazy journalism (sorry to pick on your employer Alex!)
but, the comparison you're looking for can be see with the Jones Boyz/Bobby Cox here in Atlanta... Pujols is on his way to a lot of years starting his career w/ LaRussa, but still has a ways to go to match Jetes/Mo and Chipper/Andruw...
29 Well, just Chipper now...
If Heyman is saying the truth, then I have no sympathies at all for Torre. I wouldn't have minded if he stayed, but not crying either.
i do, however, agree with 24 . torre's gone and there are a lot of things to do and discuss.
hey yankz - if no one minds the OT: you oughtta take a quick break from youtube if you're in a drumming mood... go to www.hudsonmusic.com , click on "Solo Of The Week", scroll down and to the right of the video screen, click Papa Jo Jones. then spend 5 minutes with your jaw dropped - it's awesome! : )
speaking of donnie's audio...um, uh, er, not so good. : ~
i hate the whole went/gone thing, too. okay, long day, sorry for the basic grammar rant //
Lets review what we know based on Torre's statement.
1) He agree that he would have taken $5m if it was 2 years. ANYONE would feel a little insulted with a pay cut. Thats human nature. Every single apect of the deal was part of it... and a cut hurts... but overall, it was NOT about the money
2) Again, the 2nd year gets a Yes. So in practical terms, that was the kicker. In a one-year deal, he can be fired at ANY TIME, without the Yanks losing much money or face. George promised Yogi a full year, and fired him after 16 games. 16 GAMES! Was 1 year really worth that?
3) In everything I read, including Torre's own statements, the incentives is what pissed him off. They were asinine. Too asssume that Torre didn't want to win? Someone here really thinks Torre needed an incentive to win? And that HE ALONE has the magic power to keep Wang from pitching like shit, to WILL the team to bat over .200? To smite the Midges with a glare?
I don't give Torre that much credit for winning or losing. But looking at the 12 years in it's entirity... how many managers could have done better?
And after that 1996-2000 run, the Yankees were really bringing in the money. If Joe wanted a raise, for ALL the reason he might have, is using his 'winning in the PS' as a bargaining chip that crazy? What would YOU have said if you were in the same position?
Even with Torre gone, and in this shitty manner, his detractors will continue to look for ways to make Torre bad (or at least 'less good')
He's no poet, but his remarks were touching in their sincerity.
He'll have no problem getting along with, and supporting the new manager. He'll just keep doing his thing, leading mostly by example.
Who knows how he'll age? He's an extremely impressive athlete even with all the miles he has on him already. At some point, he'll have to acknowledge that he needs to rest more than he does. Should he switch to third base? I suspect that position will open up sooner than most others here believe.
Unfortunately, I think the team is going to struggle more next season than it did this year (especially if there's a job opening at third base/cleanup). The young pitchers will go through their growing pains, and the veterans will be another year older, and wiser to the fact that they're playing a young man's game.
Hamfisted Hank Steinbrenner is right. "Nothing lasts forever." Especially in baseball.
For the record, my tempered pessimism regarding the 2008 Yanks probably has more to do with the change of season, the coming of winter, and the start of a World Series I'd rather not watch, but probably will.
"I talked to someone that worked at Accenture" - I mean really? That's how you prepped for the interview? I'm just now realizing that Donnie's probably never interviewed before, at least not successfully unless he had to interview for batting coach, which I doubt.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.