Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Gary Sheffield aggrivated a shoulder injury on Tuesday and is out indefinitely. I don't think any of the Yankee pitchers will bark about not having to face Sheff.
Meanwhile, is Mike Mussina done? Is he finished, kaput? Anthony McCarron examines this question in the Daily News:
A major league scout familiar with Mussina's work said yesterday that velocity "is his problem." Mussina has never been a power pitcher, nor has he needed to throw that hard to win. But his hard stuff was clocked mostly around 86 mph Tuesday night in Anaheim, which the scout says hinders Mussina's arsenal of off-speed and breaking pitches."You have to have separation," the scout said. "There has to be some change of speeds with the fastball. If the changeup or the breaking balls are too close, they lose their effectiveness."
The scout also noted the difference in Mussina's starts against good teams and bad ones. Mussina is 2-4 with a 6.65 ERA in eight starts against teams that had winning records entering yesterday's play. Against teams that were below .500 entering yesterday, he was 6-5 with a 4.34 ERA.
"Which is typical when you start to lose your stuff," the scout said. "You're still smart enough to get the inferior hitters out, but you have problems when you pitch against the better-hitting teams because there are fewer inferior hitters."
Mussina is a number five pitcher now. The Yanks still have some weak teams to play in October. He still has a chance to contribute. The question is, does he have enough stuff left? Color me skeptical.
* I bit the headline from one of the comments the other night.
Dunno what to think. Honestly - he had it just a month ago, and now it's gone. Do you go with unproven rookie in post season (assuming the team makes it that far)?
http://video.nbcsports.com/player/?id=115760
I realize that is probably easier said than done. In fact, it may be counter-productive (lose break on your pitches at slower speeds). Just a thought.
Kind of sad I'm suggesting replacing Moose with Loaiza, even though I know it's not really a great idea. Why spend trading chips to exchange crap for crap...
14 Yeah, all they need is another pitcher with strict usage rules in the pen (Joba, Farnsworth . . .)
Well, I hope the Yankees are playing in October, but I don't think any of the other teams are going to be weak.
Also of note, whether by luck or design, Pettitte, Clemens and Wang are lined up to start both Boston series as well as the Seattle match-up.
I'd give him another start to see if he can get his act together against a contender. If not, Moose should replace Villone as the mop up guy.
Or Joe could try something completely radical and rotate Moose into the first base/DH platoon... heh... NOT.
Has Moose reached "David Cone in 2000" status?
Ian Kennedy: here,what do you want?
It comes down to the fastball however. Even if it's only 86mph, it has to have some quality that keeps hitters honest, i.e. location, movement or deception. A few nights back, Moose had none of those.
he also didn't have that terrible fastball and hanging curve in the previous string of decent outtings, i think he desrve at least one more start that's for sure. but the Yankees probably should consider optioning Henn and callup someone that could go long if he bombs again (Igawa? his last outting was actually pretty good espically considering that he actually managed to keep the balls on the ground and in the park )
speaking of chokers, the Phighting Phils are losing again = =b.. is this gonna be the 3rd fucking year in a roll where they come very close but no cigar? (still though, harder to blame them this year consider how many guys they lost to the DL)
70 ABs 13BB 19K yeah let's keep Joba in the pen
39 a managerial change wouldn't hurt the Phils either.
btw, I think Carlos Zambrano has great stuff, but he realy really walks too many guys that i'm a little relieved we didn't end up signign him.
Dave Roberts LF
Rajah Davis CF
Randy Winn RF
Klesko 1B
Durham 2B
Aurillia 3B
Vizquel SS
Guirellio Rodriguez (who?)
Cain
seriously.. that's a team?
50 What did Aurelio Rodriguez do wrong in the '81 Serious? I'm blanking out on that one. Was Nettles hurt?
but here they are:
http://tinyurl.com/34epw8
he hit over .400 (all 5 hits were singles and had no RBI, but he didn't seem to make any errors defensively... i don't get it.)
It's probably a good thing there was no Bronx Banter back then. I wonder what the game thread would have looked like when Lemon pinch hit for Tommy John in the 4th inning of a 1-1 elimination game (especially after he brought in Frazier)...
I know you were kidding, but it seems like everytime a Yankees outlives their usefulness someone suggests moving them to first.
"He had an OPS+ of 119, he's finished"...
"But we owe it to him, look what he's done for us in the PS"...
"But, we got Ken Griffey, who needs a washed up Reggie"...
"But, what am I gonna do with all these candy bars"...
She hadn't heard of Wang however. I had to tell her to check him out.
http://tinyurl.com/3658s4
No seriously, I figured Wells was going to retire. So it is news to me.
M's are due for the inevitable letdown. I just hope it's after they overtake and KO the Halos in the West.
And above all Yanks control their outcome division and WC. You can't ask for anything better than that at this point in time.
Yeah, the M's lineup is filled with competent players top to bottom, as are all AL contenders. There are enough games left and the races tight enough not to rule anyone in or out.
.750 ball to guarantee a spot? That's easy math, but who knows, maybe everyone tanks at the same time and .550 ball does it.
Not to bust boils here, but this number projection thing starts in May and does not let up. And it never turns out how 99% of us Nostradamus' think it will.
80 I would welcome the opportunity to exorcise the demon and BBQ that f*cking monkey in the parking lot before the team bus left, onto the ALDS.
81 Brah. That makes no sense. Letdown in discussion referenced their play on the field. Or do you mean the way the '98 club let down after business was taken care of?
Of course, Chris Britton, having sat on Cashman's dog by mistake, is still buried in AAA, and Bruney, despite having shown absolutely nothing in AAA to suggest he's going to be any better but probably worse than he was before the demotion, gets the call...Whatever...
Either way, I agree with you that no contending team should be ruled out. I am just trying to fight the battle that simply because Seattle wasn't "picked" by so-called experts to be a good enough team to make the playoffs, it shouldn't extend that what they are doing now is "surprising" or unexpected., and that they are somehow "due" for a letdown. In fact, when those who so love many of the new unsound measurements use such a term, it extends that many if not all of their previous arguments that they claimed were based in numbers utterly flawed, becuase how does one measure such a letdown, and when might it occur? It is going to happen because someone says so? Because someone cannot pull some bogus stat out of their ass to make a point, doesn't mean the point attempted is wholly invalid. Saying that Seattle will finish the season playing the way they are now is just as likely as a so called letdown befalling them.
The new stats should be used like a lawyer uses circumstantial evidence, to attempt to convince people that something is more or less likely. It is not however the murder weapon with fingerprints and a video of the crime, as many claim it to be. This isn't to say that the new measurements don't have use, but using any of them to claim some argument is difinitive is just plain wrong.
I think Henn will go down too, but is anyone really shedding a tear? The guy isn't even a competent inning-eater. His performance in the first loss to the Angels was right down there with Farnsworth's, and you can't go much lower than that.
Their offense is not 3rd best in the league, it's clearly well behind us, Boston, and Detroit. I'd take Cleveland and Anaheim as well. For eff's sake, they have only 3 regulars with ops over .800, and at .831 Ichiro is their best hitter (5 of our regulars are better than their best hitter therefore, and I'd eat my Yankee cap if Abreu doesn't pass Ichiro before the season is over). And runs scored doesn't lie. 4 of the teams I've just named have outscored the M's, and Cleveland and Texas are right there with them.
As for pitching, the bullpen can't make up for their weak starting pitching. Surely even VI wouldn't take Felix, Washburn, Batista, Weaver, and Ramirez over Wang, Rocket, Andy, Phil and Moose. Look at the numbers there.
And the .750 winning percentage to get in the playoffs is a number picked out of thin air. We can make up all 3 games in the loss column just by sweeping them at our place, where we have our best pitchers lined up to face them. As has been endlessly repeated here and elsewhere, their schedule is also much tougher. Just check out how the A's are doing lately. Cleveland is also rebounding. They have 2 series against each of those. To say nothing about Anaheim.
In addition, if Seattle plays the well over .600 ball needed to make us have to play .750 ball -- that number again -- chances are they pass Anaheim, with whom they have to play a home-home still. There's only 1 game separating those teams. If they beat up on Anaheim, that leaves the door open for us to pass the Angels, as we're only 3 back.
And no, this has nothing to do with whether "experts" picked Seattle in march, but rather from a realistic look at their lineup, their starting pitching (you're going to pick a team with Weaver and Ramirez in the rotation?, really?), and their schedule.
If we go 26-9 -- .742 ball, less than VI's magic number, the Mariners would have to go 26-11 to hold us off -- .702 ball.
Asking us to play .750 ball to make the playoffs is counting on the M's to play over .700 ball for the rest of the season, and assuming that somehow in doing so they don't pass Anaheim, with whom they have 7 games left to play.
I do agree with you about the Angels. It would be great if Seattle knocks them off and we can kick them from the playoffs altogether. It's not like I am going to be pulling for the Mariners, I'm just happy for them is all, and think they need some respect for the way they are playing down the stretch.
I hope I am totally wrong and you all make fun of me at the Parade.
If I a had a buck for every pundit (media hack and 'blogger' combined) who swore the 2005 Yanks' 11-29 start spelled doom, and flipped that to Apple stock, I'd be doing OK.
You've been all M's, all the time. All I'm saying is that I think... hey, there are 30+ games left. 3 with them. I'm not conceding anything. M's have a tougher sked from here on out. Not to mention I have not written off the East yet, but that's another story...
I'm sorry to be all M's all the time. I'm trying to not just bash our opponents, and the teams ahead of us and parse every move Torre makes, because I am actually pretty happy about the way he is handling the club right now.
Sheff has a right to say whatever he wants. This is all about the First Amendment. Let's not follow the gov't down the path of censorship. After all, censorship is becoming America's favorite past-time. The US gov't (and their corporate friends), already detain protesters, ban books like "America Deceived" from Amazon and Wikipedia, shut down Imus and fire 21-year tenured, BYU physics professor Steven Jones because he proved explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC buildings. Free Speech forever (even for ignorant baseball players).
Last link (before Google Books caves to pressure and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.