Yanks look to gain another game on the Sox tonight as Moose gets the start vs. Julian Tavarez. C'mon fellas, whatta ya say? Three-in-a-row would be lovely.
I think if the Yanks are ever going to grab some momentum, they need this one. They definitely need 2 out of 3 and you'd think it'd be easier off Tavarez, and it would build momentum for a sweep against Shilling.
On an unrelated note, I tried to bring up the really rare calls the umps have made against the Yanks in an earlier thread, but the discussion went in another direction. Anyone have any thoughts to MCI's HBP that wasn't, and the "free" ball given to the Sox batter (I don't recall who) when Wang went to his mouth accidentally to fix his fingernail? Even though these are the rules as written, I can't ever recall them being called that way in any game, not to mention against the Yanks. What's on tap for tonight, an appeal on a sac fly where the runner is ruled to have left early?
To me, this is Moose's chance to show he belongs near the top of the rotation. There's little doubt in my mind that the Yanks score at least 4 runs. The question is: Does Moose pitch better than that and deep into the game?
2 I have seen the "going to the mouth" call before, usually as a balk with runners on, but I've never seen the HBP one, though announcers like to always talk about it. Who knows, maybe the umps are feeling ornery lately?
5 I'm not sure if this was televised, but after the home plate ump finished talking with Wang and Posada on the mound, Posada turned and walked towards home all the while giving the "yap-yap" gesture, opening and closing his raised hand multiple times in the direction of the 3B ump. It was classic Jorgie. I loved it.
When Wang pitched himself out of trouble I turned and noted to my wife that Wang was throwing a ton of sliders. "That's surprising." No great insight, but nice to see that I have become a more observant and knowledgeable fan thanks to the Banter and other good blogs.
I've seen the (non)HBP call before but really think it was wrongly applied to Minky. The pitch was going to cross the middle of the batter's box, calf high. I think he tried to decide which way to feint, and at the last second turned so it'd hit soft tissue rather than the lower kneebone or shin. I think it was just another example of an ump being a dck, for the hell of it.
I agree that the HBP call was weak in that it looked like he strode towards the plate as if he thought it was going to be an outside pitch, and then he was so shocked that it started that far inside he froze - I bet we won't see that same call in the next 10 years of MLB.
I agree that those two calls seemed a little nitpicky. Also, at least Torre came out of the dugout for those two calls. The two biggest blown calls this year (the one against Seattle at 2nd and the Posada play at 1B last night) Torre didn't even come out to argue. I realize that he is not going to get them to change the call (although sometimes they do ask the other umps for help) but at least he might get the next one and IMO he certainly should be out there backing up Posada (even if he thought he was out).
I'm totally wrong. West's crew didn't even work the Mets series.
West worked the Cubs/White Sox series, and followed Cliff Floyd back to the dugout after he struck out looking, and then tossed Floyd. Bob Brenly pointed out that West sort of instigated the confrontation.
I wonder if this is the solution to the question that many of us have had about the Wanger. That is, his minor league stats mirror his major league stats almost exactly, with the exception of strikeouts. He's avging 3.3 k/9 in the show vs 7 per 9 in the minors.
Last night he got 5 in 6 ip, and the slider seemed to be his k pitch.
Did he just use the slider more in the minors, and did this acct for the increased k's?
The one he was throwing last night was nifty. I remember tho in his first season and last season he hung it often when he did go to it. Perhaps this was why he almost exclusively has used the sinker in the majors.
If he can work the slider in as a k pitch and get back to striking out 7 or even 8 batters per 9ip, he'll really be a beast.
Maybe someone else should be in charge of getting in umps' faces. Guidry or Mattingly, they'd both be pretty good at it. I'd pick Guidry. I can't tell whether Bowa would be any good.
18 You don't want the pitching coach tossed. Bowa would be perfect, he'd get his money's worth and then some.
The HBP was a joke -- I could understand it if it was the arm or torso, but no one wants to get nailed on the knee. Still, this might be karmic payback for Jeffrey Maier.
Wang admitted he is gaining confidence in his other pitches this year and last night he went to them more regularly than ever before. Of the 114 pitches he threw last night, he said "20-something were sliders" and "about 10" were changeups.
"This was the most sliders in one game," Wang said. He added he was not sure how much he will use the off-speed pitch in the future. "It depends on the opponent and if the sinker is working, you have to stick with it," he said.
~~~
I'm not sure if I'm entirely happy with the last statement, it shows Wang hasn't quite grasped the importance of adding another plus quality pitch to his arsenal. I'm hoping Guidry and Posada keep pounding last night's success into his head.
..I have to say Wang did not look that good to me against the Sox: lots of 2-0 counts, pitching up in the zone. I'm not gonna get excited about the slider just yet. But he made some good pitches when he had to....
Friggin Moose. I have to say, if we do make the playoffs, I don't want this guy in the rotation. It needs to be Wang, Roger, Hughes, and AnybodybutMoose.
What's worse, is that it is painful to watch. He tries to be too perfect, relying on the same old stuff. It notices how incredible Maddux and Moyer have been. But unlike Moyer and Maddux, Mussina refuses to change his approach in game. He just keeps plugging along with the same old strategy.
Also, slightly off-topic, but the other Yankee broadcasters seem to be working really hard to make "Flash" stick as a nickname for Flaherty. I don't remember ever hearing it when he was a player.
These are the toughest games to watch. At any moment the Red Sox seem like they are about to put up a crooked number against Moose. Meanwhile the Yankee bats are silent so far. Ugh.
Well clearly Moose is stating his case as NOT one of a big three. Way to kill any and all momentum Mike. A 3 run HR in the top of the first sure can take the wind out of your sails, eh? THis game is now all set up to have us bow out to Tavarez. Yuck!
So, if we were all convinced that Hughes was really throwing 93-94 despite the YS gun saying 90-91, then what's the actual speed of Mike Mussina's titanic 86 mph fastball?
63 During normal banking hours I'd say you should limit it to 2 transactions, otherwise go to a freaking bank. After hours, you don't know, maybe the guy needs to do a bunch of stuff right away.
63 I'm guessing that it depends on what that bunch of people look like they're gonna do next. If they're quietly and patiently waiting, hurry up and do your biz. If they're tapping their feet and making impatient noises, slow down and count each penny, carry the one, and so on. But if they start pulling down the ski masks, run.
I guess that two year deal for Moose is not looking so good anymore. He was so good last year, but it looks as if Mussina has reverted to 2004/5 form, which would seriously lessen the Yankees chance of making the post season.
Suzyn Waldman: "Lowell having an outstanding year both at the plate and in the field."
Baseball Prospectus -- er, no Suzy he may be hitting well, but he's fielding at an 87 RATE, well below avg and well below his stellar career RATe of 108
92 In that case, if it was a short line, I'd offer anyone making one cash transaction a chance to go first. Otherwise, I'd try to go as fast as possible.
21 I think the reason Wang said that is that they've been trying to cut down on the kinds of pitches he throws. I read one article about Wang where they said he was like a sponge. Any pitch he saw, he wanted to learn - and he did. Very quickly. He had something like 8 pitches in his arsenal, and they thought he should trim that down.
Tavarez at 78 pitches thru 4. Another inning like that and he'll be done and we can get to the Sawx middle relief.
Meanwhile, tough 1st ip for Joba the Hut against Jupiter -- 3h, 1bb, 2 er -- but he's been stellar since, only giving up 1 hit and 1 walk, striking out 6
113 His .240/.358/.429 would not be a huge improvement over Abreu's .244/.328/.338. Add in the multiple years Sheff wanted and the fact that the Yanks can get out of Abreu's contract after this season and it's still a no-brainer.
116 Yeah, I half had the thought about pitch count and getting into the bullpen, and then I remembered: Tavarez basically is a mediocre middle reliever. We already have the guy we can hit, so just freaking hit him.
That's a major let down. With Okajima and Papelbon that games gets very short. It's pretty amazing that neither Jeter nor Matsui could make solid contact.
I mentioned earlier in another thread that I was a bit dismayed about what seemed to me the team's reliance on the longball in their new life the past couple of days.
I think this is what I had in mind; they need to convince me they can scratch out a couple of runs here without a homer and I'll be a happy man.
There was an SI article at the beginning of the year that made some ridiculous claim about umpires missing only a handful of calls on the bases ALL year. In the first 7 weeks of this season, there have been at least 10 poor calls in Yankees games alone.
181 But not that right hander! Torre is throwing in the towel. I guess he might as well. This team expects to lose, so it shouldn't be a suprise that they've become quite good at it.
I think Joe made the right call here: Vizcaino is the right man in this spot. You don't want to waste Bruney or Mo. And Proctor is obviously out of the question.
Well...it looks like sub-.500 into June. I am now ready to concede the division, which I guess only means I'll now root for Boston to beat the likes of Cleveland and Detroit.
Jeter and Matsui making outs with bases loaded and Jorge GDP in the 6th really hurt. It is not our hitting, as much as our situational hitting when we are behind, that is killing us.
178 A hard hit, one hopper to his backhand? Butchered? That was not an easy play.
171 It was VERY close and I think he was safe. The replay (NESN) looked like he had his hand in when he was tagged.
I don't know what to do with our $16m auto-out. Abreu is killing us no matter where he bats in the lineup. Has he had an RBI in the last month? 15 day DL him and bring up KT? At this point, especially considering defense, KT gives us a better chance.
Tough call for Torre. Maybe the Angels will take Abreu for Figgens and cash.
Kay is making a great point. Hindsight is 20/20, but the Yankees really miss Sheffield. I was happy with the trade, but Sheffield is exactly what this team needs. A right slugger whom you can plant in the 3-hole.
I know this has probably been discussed to death here, but what can they do to improve for the future (rebuild, in other words)if they decide they're out of it this year?
Well looks like I picked the right game to miss. Somehow I had a hunch. So this game, and Moose, will either go down as the momentum killer/nail in the coffin, or just a blip on our way up. If they can win tomorrow, chalk it up to a bad game. If not, well, poop
208 Blip in the way up? They had only won 2 games in a row, after losing 3 in a row and 5 of 6. Without a doubt, this is yet another anchor in a season going nowhere.
196 I don't agree with giving up. This is a team that can hit. They do put some crazy shite together sometimes.
I agree with some of the guys that have written on here who say they'd like to see a Yankee get fired up. I know that's not Torre's bag, but someone needs to get these guys pumped up.
Two more runs for the Yanks and it's a tie game when you take the bad SB call away.
215 I don't agree with giving up either, but reality sucks. This team is still 10.5 games behind with no signs of positive momentum. The team is losing 7-2 in a game that featured Mussina vs. Tavarez. What more can you ask for?
217 Why would anyone watch if they prefer to be blind to reality? Watching implies "seeing", and the reality is this team has shown no signs of contending.
So is this what it's come down to. Before it was the dog or the wife that had to put up with the incessant negativity. Now it's your friendly neighborhood blogmates.
216 Oh...so you think this loss is a positive? Once again, "without a doubt" this loss is another low point in a season full of low points. If you see a positive in this loss, please share it.
223 I find it amazing how so many people can't accept valid criticism of the team. Is this a forum for an honest discussion of the team? If so, how could the tone be anything but negative.
222 Please don't presume to think for me. Minds, dull ones and great ones alike are prone to divergent rather than convergent thought at times. Why not accept that not everyone sees things just as you do? Could you at least keep the doom and gloom comments to a minimum. If you want to offer an informed critique instead I'm all eyes.
222 Maybe your time would be better spent, oh I dunno, getting drunk or something - as opposed to watching & getting yourself more & more depressed every single night.
225 Huh?
I didn't say that the loss is a positive, whatever that means. I was making fun of your 'without a doubt'.
You said that the season is going nowhere 'without a doubt'. That shows a disturbing incapacity for doubt on your part.
223 Come back another day, claybeez. This is a particularly depressive crowd.
229 I don't drink. I watch baseball. I also have no problem honestly assessing the performance of the team. If others feel positive, good for them. I haven't seen many positive signs and have failed to read a convincing argument from one of the resident optimists.
Anyway, you doom and gloomers or trolls or whatever can have the night. Lots of us see that the team is playing poorly, but telling others what they need to see and pronouncing the season over after every bad inning lacks foresight.
I loved coming here. I think Alex and Cliff need to check back in more often and steer this board back towards more enlightened banter.
236 You guys are amusing. Whenever someone provides a negative commentary, you complain about the tone and suggest that the Banter is going down hill. Well, I think positive spin is inane, but that doesn't mean I take my ball and go home or hope that Alex/Cliff will steer the conversation more in line with my opinions. Geez...I didn't realize so many here can't handle differing opinions.
243 I agree. Who gives a shit about beating Boston? We can surely make up a ten game lead without doing it. Or maybe we can do it every once in a while.
252 just because a broken clock happens to be correct twice a day, doesn't mean i should look to it when i need to know the time ... but thanks for being that shining beacon of intellectual courage that we all need in these desperate times ...
This whole negative versus positive debate is really silly. Is it really being negative to suggest that the Yankees poor play has made winning the division a seemingly lost cause? I don't think that's negative; I think it's realistic. When one of the resident optimists can put together a sound argument for why losing a game like this doesn't put the division all but out of reach, then I'll listen. Those who simply complain because they'd rather not be exposed to "negative" thoughts don't really hold much sway.
253 From Wikipedia:
Bush league is a term used to describe someone who is really a Red Sox fan but hangs out on a Yankee site during infrequent Boston hot streaks but disappears when the Yankees are winning.
264 I'm not really interested in your cliched, petty retorts. I could care less whether you "look to" my analysis or not. I am only interested in those willing to debate the merits of the Yankees performance, not whether others have the right to think differently from them.
270 What I think is funny is how anyone could expect the tone of a game thread like this to be anything but negative. When the Yankees play poorly, one should expect negative comments. If I'm kicking the team when they play well, then I'll take the criticism to heart.
williamnyy23 and Mattpat11
2 years ago, a Red Sox/Yankees game would generate 700-1000 entres on this blog.
Of 270 entres, you two have about 70 of them.
You have basically done 2 things.
1) Remind us that the Yankees suck
2) Defend yourselves because people are reacting negatively to your presense here.
The 2 of you are chasing people away. Many have expressed that sentiment here, many others will just quietly leave.
You are much more interesed in voicing your opinions, or should I say reality? then in listening to others and trying to be a contributing part of this community.
You are hurting this blog and the great efforts Alex and Cliff have put into building this community.
Now please, write some intelligent, defensive retort to this comment, and certainly don't think about what I've said.
I need someone to explain to me, what, on a day where the Yankees have lost their sixth game of the season to Boston and pushed the team back to a double digit deficit, what exactly would be a productive post that contributes to the community?
277 When I signed on mid-way through the game, there were only 60 posts. I have a hard time believing I'm driving people away. I think the Yankees poor play is doing that just fine.
If offering your honest opinion is hurting a blog, then that doesn't speak well for the participants. If you read my posts, I do not disparage others. Instead, I simply point out "negative" aspects about a poor performance. If this community can only tolerate positive thoughts, then I don't really want to be a part of it. There are more than enough posters who seem quite capable of dealing with diverse opinions. When that stops being the case, I'll bow out.
I'm sorry you don't like my presence. To be honest, I don't really enjoy the presence of several members as well. Instead of disparaging them, I simply ignore their comments. I don't feel the need to pontificate about what is a good opinion and sincerely wish you would refrain from doing the same.
The Yanks' efforts tonight in a Mussina-Tavarez match-up in a must sweep home series were depressing and embarrassing beyond words. The pitching stinks, and our hitters have made Tavarez look like Cy Young for an unacceptable second time this season. This looks like early '78 again, but another comeback is highly unlikely with the Red Sox pitching this year....and I see nothing that gives me hope that the Yankees can play the necessary .600+ baseball for 118 games......They can not even win 3 in a row with a favorable pitching match-up at home. If things do not change real fast, the Captain will be watching the post-season for the first time in his career. Nothing much to cheer about these days other than Derek imitating the Clipper and Jorge.
Let's hope the hitters support Andy tomorrow night for once, get the deficit back under 10 games, and we take care of the BoSox in the next series at Fenway.
Melky and Cano both had good at-bats in the ninth.
In fact, it's just this sort of at-bat that gives so much faith in Melky. That was a tough at-bat in a very tough situation, coming off the bench against a guy like Paplebon. He struck out, but not without a fight. He just got beat, no shame in that.
Cano interestingly swung at ball four high yet laid off a much tougher pitch low for ball four. That was a good at-bat. If he can learn to lay off that high pitch as well, we might be in business.
Also, the team did put up a fight, but I think it all came down to the bottom of the seventh.
AFter they put up those runs, Giambi went up there and hit a fairly weak tapper to first on a 3-1 pitch.
What the hell was he doing? That's a poor at-bat. If you're going to swing 3-1 in that spot you damned well better make good contact.
And then Robbie swinging at the first pitch, not good. Not good. I forget who the third out was (Phelps?) but the inning was a disgrace. They needed to make Boston work at least, to try to grind out something.
It was as if they'd lost focus or were just deflated by the top of the inning.
For this team to start to perform better they're going to need to put up quality at-bats each and every time they step up to the plate.
Boston, meanwhile, hit the ball the other way and up the middle with two outs.
We need to take a page out of their book.
Oh, and one last thing to be positive about--Moose pitched his ass off. He kept us in the game despite a poor performance. Since I don't expect an A-type performance from him anymore, I think it's fair to say he did his job.
It's time for the bats to hit the baseball.
They need to win without the homerun, to remember how to hit singles.
Actually, the negativity and "realism" have scared ME away. It just hasnt been worth it to slog through all the apocolyptic posts.
OldYanksFan is right, I feel. Whatever my opinion is worth.
And Moose totally pitched great considering the Manny homer. If only that ump hadnt blown that CS call....
Then again, yesterday Wang got a pitcher's pitch to get Youkilis, and Posada was out tonight on that DP ball (of which A-Rod was out of line, and got credit over Pedroia's rookieness). I guess the blown calls are a part of the game. Which is why Jeter should not have been taking with 2 strikes and Papeljerk's mechanics all out of wack. Check out the HardBallTimes article on Papeljerk and a possible injury. Watching him lately makes me think it may be true.
288 I wouldn't quite say I'm revelling in strikeouts, but the point about Melky was less a point about the team than it was about the development and potential of Melky Cabrera.
I'm still watching him like a hawk for improvement because I really like him and that at-bat reminded me why, is all.
I'm rooting for him.
I don't know, I don't think I'm looking for "nice signs" so much as "quality baseball," or things to build upon.
That was maybe the worst at-bat I've seen from him all year.
There's absolutely no excuse for him not to be protecting there.
I mean, I think it's fair to say that was clearly too close to take after the previous strike. He should have been looking to drive that pitch the other way, or at least to ward it off and wait for a better one.
But that's fine, he's entitled to a bad at-bat now and again, he's obviously doing his part, like when he led off the 8th with that single up the middle.
If more guys just tried to go up the middle and opposite field I really think we'd be seeing much better results.
289 Tell me. 10.5 games out. Totally non competitive with Boston. What is there to be positive about? And spare me the "IF SUCH AND SUCH HAPPENED we'd have 15 more wins!" Because such and such didn't happen when the Yankees sucked it away. The fact that we could be better if the team was competent is of little consolation to me.
From your post, and your repeated use of the haha-larious "Papeljerk" I assume you think the blog should be filled with "Red Sux sux! M I Rite? Come on Dougie! I no u can get a hit one of these times! Hit a HR!"
Or maybe "If the Yankees would have just hit the ball every so often, we'd be 25-18! No need to panic!"
Just a general question for all the positive people. In your opinion, if the Yankees hope to contend, when do you think would be a good starting point for them to start winning? Obviously its not tonight. Thats too negative. But when is a positive time to demand this team win 13 of 15 and beat the teams they need to beat?
A follow up question. If the team continues to play like this, at one point is it no longer negative to say this team needs a miracle to make the playoffs? Another week? two? Three?
The obsession with fundamentals, while somewhat warranted, is a little extreme. I remember someone complaining recently that Matsui tried to pull an outside pitch. I kept that in mind, and the very next day, I saw Matsui hit a double to left on an outside pitch. Had he forgotten how to hit the previous day? No. It was just proof that hitting a baseball is in fact the hardest thing to do in sports. A lot has to go right. "A-Rod should not be swinging through fat fastballs"? It's a little harder than it looks.
You say it's a little extreme, and you may be right. It's just my observations.
You're right, sometimes they do pull those pitches with authority, but they usually don't.
It's not about forgetting how to hit, it's about giving yourself the best chance to get a hit with each at-bat. Trying to pull that outside pitch doesn't appear to be the best way to maximize one's chances for success.
If you watched Boston tonight, you'll have noticed how often they just hit the ball where it was pitched. Youklis and Ortiz both did masterful jobs of that and in my humble opinion, the ability to do that with consistency is the difference between a winning team and a losing one.
At least, it seems to be a major factor.
And I still believe Arod shouldn't be swinging through fat fastballs.
Of course it's harder than it looks, but I don't think that's the issue.
Arod swung through that pitch because he refused to shorten his swing.
Sometimes I actually do see Matsui take that outside pitch the other way, which is why it puzzles me that he doesn't do it more often.
In some situations it pays to gamble on hitting a double or a homerun, in others, it's best to pass the baton, as it were, to play pepper and keep the inning going.
Frankly I don't think stressing fundamentals can be extreme, I mean, they're fundamentals, not special super powers I'm looking for.
"Which is why Jeter should not have been taking with 2 strikes and Papeljerk's mechanics all out of wack. Check out the HardBallTimes article on Papeljerk and a possible injury. Watching him lately makes me think it may be true. "
You complain about the site and then say Papeljerk like you're 12.
As far as the injury, 94 and no one stood a chance. Did you actually watch the game?
300Actually, despite the fact that my team is performing pretty much as expected, this is only about the third time I've bothered to log in here this year. Hadn't really planned to comment, just enjoy the breast-beating, pulling of hair, and gnashing of teeth.
Regarding the injuries that have befallen the Yankees pitching prospects and designated fifth starters du jour, did you not think there would eventually be karmic payback for Small and Chacon? George may be able to torch $200M on "talent," but apparently the devil cannot be bought.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.
On an unrelated note, I tried to bring up the really rare calls the umps have made against the Yanks in an earlier thread, but the discussion went in another direction. Anyone have any thoughts to MCI's HBP that wasn't, and the "free" ball given to the Sox batter (I don't recall who) when Wang went to his mouth accidentally to fix his fingernail? Even though these are the rules as written, I can't ever recall them being called that way in any game, not to mention against the Yanks. What's on tap for tonight, an appeal on a sac fly where the runner is ruled to have left early?
When Wang pitched himself out of trouble I turned and noted to my wife that Wang was throwing a ton of sliders. "That's surprising." No great insight, but nice to see that I have become a more observant and knowledgeable fan thanks to the Banter and other good blogs.
Actually, both paragraphs are about awesome facts.
West worked the Cubs/White Sox series, and followed Cliff Floyd back to the dugout after he struck out looking, and then tossed Floyd. Bob Brenly pointed out that West sort of instigated the confrontation.
West was the guy who called Wang last night.
I wonder if this is the solution to the question that many of us have had about the Wanger. That is, his minor league stats mirror his major league stats almost exactly, with the exception of strikeouts. He's avging 3.3 k/9 in the show vs 7 per 9 in the minors.
Last night he got 5 in 6 ip, and the slider seemed to be his k pitch.
Did he just use the slider more in the minors, and did this acct for the increased k's?
The one he was throwing last night was nifty. I remember tho in his first season and last season he hung it often when he did go to it. Perhaps this was why he almost exclusively has used the sinker in the majors.
If he can work the slider in as a k pitch and get back to striking out 7 or even 8 batters per 9ip, he'll really be a beast.
(I had to say it. I'm also wearing the same clothes from yesterday. TMI?)
2 Minky's HBP, I think we got screwed.
13 Exactly. Recently someone posted a link to a youtube of a young Joe cussing out some umps. When I saw it I thought, Who IS that guy???
The HBP was a joke -- I could understand it if it was the arm or torso, but no one wants to get nailed on the knee. Still, this might be karmic payback for Jeffrey Maier.
OT: The NY Post and ESPN are reporting the Angels are interested in Giambi.
Wang admitted he is gaining confidence in his other pitches this year and last night he went to them more regularly than ever before. Of the 114 pitches he threw last night, he said "20-something were sliders" and "about 10" were changeups.
"This was the most sliders in one game," Wang said. He added he was not sure how much he will use the off-speed pitch in the future. "It depends on the opponent and if the sinker is working, you have to stick with it," he said.
~~~
I'm not sure if I'm entirely happy with the last statement, it shows Wang hasn't quite grasped the importance of adding another plus quality pitch to his arsenal. I'm hoping Guidry and Posada keep pounding last night's success into his head.
It still seems wrong to me for Yankee games to be on WOR, and Mets games on WPIX. 'T'ain't right.
I was actually thinking Wamg, Roger, Wang, Roger :)
30 Unfortunately, you are right. I remember when the Red Sox could barely hit him as he out pitched Pedro on a regular basis.
31 Is that realistic? Really? Torre is going to send the Mike Mussina to the bullpen?
What's worse, is that it is painful to watch. He tries to be too perfect, relying on the same old stuff. It notices how incredible Maddux and Moyer have been. But unlike Moyer and Maddux, Mussina refuses to change his approach in game. He just keeps plugging along with the same old strategy.
(Sorry for forgetting about Pettite above)
Oh, I didn't notice that there are no outs. He only sends in the pinch runner with two out.
But I'm no Dear Abby, so who knows...
Baseball Prospectus -- er, no Suzy he may be hitting well, but he's fielding at an 87 RATE, well below avg and well below his stellar career RATe of 108
Er, scratch that, call them up right now.
Now let's see someone make it really painful. Maybe Posada.
Okay, now we need an Abreu walk, and a Giambi Bombi.
Now this is Julian Tavarez.
Meanwhile, tough 1st ip for Joba the Hut against Jupiter -- 3h, 1bb, 2 er -- but he's been stellar since, only giving up 1 hit and 1 walk, striking out 6
Hit it to the right side please, Doug Out.
Walking DougOut? Maybe Tvz is coming apart...
He's so clutch right now.
Now Matsui must get on for A-Rod...
Progress. But slow progress.
Now get a pair of runs.
We should have played one practice inning first.
Jorgie's hitting .440 from the right side.
I think this is what I had in mind; they need to convince me they can scratch out a couple of runs here without a homer and I'll be a happy man.
157 I think you want a pitcher you can hit hard. No? That was Tavarez. Now it's gonna have to be Lopez, and I'm not confident we can hit him hard.
Also, I mentioned earlier in the year, but Posada's throwing has regressed significantly. He should have thrown out Crisp.
178 A hard hit, one hopper to his backhand? Butchered? That was not an easy play.
171 It was VERY close and I think he was safe. The replay (NESN) looked like he had his hand in when he was tagged.
I don't know what to do with our $16m auto-out. Abreu is killing us no matter where he bats in the lineup. Has he had an RBI in the last month? 15 day DL him and bring up KT? At this point, especially considering defense, KT gives us a better chance.
Tough call for Torre. Maybe the Angels will take Abreu for Figgens and cash.
194 And Cairo plays shortstop, right? We should have a Bizarro team.
Kay is making a great point. Hindsight is 20/20, but the Yankees really miss Sheffield. I was happy with the trade, but Sheffield is exactly what this team needs. A right slugger whom you can plant in the 3-hole.
Abreu will be better. He'll get on base a lot. He just didn't do it today.
I agree with some of the guys that have written on here who say they'd like to see a Yankee get fired up. I know that's not Torre's bag, but someone needs to get these guys pumped up.
Two more runs for the Yanks and it's a tie game when you take the bad SB call away.
You need some doubting practice, dude.
I think I'll tune out. I don't like the way this banter is bantering.
I think I may be giving up on game threads.
Yay this game!
Maybe tomorrow we can do it AGAIN and be 11.5 out!
At least getting drunk feels nice after a while.
I didn't say that the loss is a positive, whatever that means. I was making fun of your 'without a doubt'.
You said that the season is going nowhere 'without a doubt'. That shows a disturbing incapacity for doubt on your part.
223 Come back another day, claybeez. This is a particularly depressive crowd.
I'm out, see youse tomorrow.
Also, the thinnest of silver linings? They didn't burn out the bullpen. Moose sucked, but at least he gave them 6.2 innings...(.2 too many?)
;-)
I loved coming here. I think Alex and Cliff need to check back in more often and steer this board back towards more enlightened banter.
Without a doubt refers to this loss being another low point in the season, preventing the team from rising in the standing. I stand by that.
go pettitte! let's destroy scurt manana...
Why do MattPatt and Williamnyy23 remind me of the Bill Paxton character...?
the old back push hustle.... cough*bushleague*cough
I further assume the character died.
his posture during his slide would probably call for a different photoshop such as pushing a baby carriage or something
Bush league is a term used to describe someone who is really a Red Sox fan but hangs out on a Yankee site during infrequent Boston hot streaks but disappears when the Yankees are winning.
im not hanging out anywhere.. im sitting in my living room with a laptop just like you.
2 years ago, a Red Sox/Yankees game would generate 700-1000 entres on this blog.
Of 270 entres, you two have about 70 of them.
You have basically done 2 things.
1) Remind us that the Yankees suck
2) Defend yourselves because people are reacting negatively to your presense here.
The 2 of you are chasing people away. Many have expressed that sentiment here, many others will just quietly leave.
You are much more interesed in voicing your opinions, or should I say reality? then in listening to others and trying to be a contributing part of this community.
You are hurting this blog and the great efforts Alex and Cliff have put into building this community.
Now please, write some intelligent, defensive retort to this comment, and certainly don't think about what I've said.
I'm upset by this loss and the season so far, but my God, 277 OldYanksFan nails it.
Pettitte tomorrow. LET'S GO YANKS!
I assume it would be "Go Johnny! Get a hit!"
If offering your honest opinion is hurting a blog, then that doesn't speak well for the participants. If you read my posts, I do not disparage others. Instead, I simply point out "negative" aspects about a poor performance. If this community can only tolerate positive thoughts, then I don't really want to be a part of it. There are more than enough posters who seem quite capable of dealing with diverse opinions. When that stops being the case, I'll bow out.
I'm sorry you don't like my presence. To be honest, I don't really enjoy the presence of several members as well. Instead of disparaging them, I simply ignore their comments. I don't feel the need to pontificate about what is a good opinion and sincerely wish you would refrain from doing the same.
Let's hope the hitters support Andy tomorrow night for once, get the deficit back under 10 games, and we take care of the BoSox in the next series at Fenway.
I don't recall him spraying the ball this a couple of years ago.
He's really a good hitter, hard to catch off-balance, has some very effective defensive swings.
Melky and Cano both had good at-bats in the ninth.
In fact, it's just this sort of at-bat that gives so much faith in Melky. That was a tough at-bat in a very tough situation, coming off the bench against a guy like Paplebon. He struck out, but not without a fight. He just got beat, no shame in that.
Cano interestingly swung at ball four high yet laid off a much tougher pitch low for ball four. That was a good at-bat. If he can learn to lay off that high pitch as well, we might be in business.
Also, the team did put up a fight, but I think it all came down to the bottom of the seventh.
AFter they put up those runs, Giambi went up there and hit a fairly weak tapper to first on a 3-1 pitch.
What the hell was he doing? That's a poor at-bat. If you're going to swing 3-1 in that spot you damned well better make good contact.
And then Robbie swinging at the first pitch, not good. Not good. I forget who the third out was (Phelps?) but the inning was a disgrace. They needed to make Boston work at least, to try to grind out something.
It was as if they'd lost focus or were just deflated by the top of the inning.
For this team to start to perform better they're going to need to put up quality at-bats each and every time they step up to the plate.
Boston, meanwhile, hit the ball the other way and up the middle with two outs.
We need to take a page out of their book.
Oh, and one last thing to be positive about--Moose pitched his ass off. He kept us in the game despite a poor performance. Since I don't expect an A-type performance from him anymore, I think it's fair to say he did his job.
It's time for the bats to hit the baseball.
They need to win without the homerun, to remember how to hit singles.
All the "nice signs" needed to lead to something a week and a half ago.
OldYanksFan is right, I feel. Whatever my opinion is worth.
And Moose totally pitched great considering the Manny homer. If only that ump hadnt blown that CS call....
Then again, yesterday Wang got a pitcher's pitch to get Youkilis, and Posada was out tonight on that DP ball (of which A-Rod was out of line, and got credit over Pedroia's rookieness). I guess the blown calls are a part of the game. Which is why Jeter should not have been taking with 2 strikes and Papeljerk's mechanics all out of wack. Check out the HardBallTimes article on Papeljerk and a possible injury. Watching him lately makes me think it may be true.
I'm still watching him like a hawk for improvement because I really like him and that at-bat reminded me why, is all.
I'm rooting for him.
I don't know, I don't think I'm looking for "nice signs" so much as "quality baseball," or things to build upon.
I'm not forecasting anything, just observing.
That was maybe the worst at-bat I've seen from him all year.
There's absolutely no excuse for him not to be protecting there.
I mean, I think it's fair to say that was clearly too close to take after the previous strike. He should have been looking to drive that pitch the other way, or at least to ward it off and wait for a better one.
But that's fine, he's entitled to a bad at-bat now and again, he's obviously doing his part, like when he led off the 8th with that single up the middle.
If more guys just tried to go up the middle and opposite field I really think we'd be seeing much better results.
From your post, and your repeated use of the haha-larious "Papeljerk" I assume you think the blog should be filled with "Red Sux sux! M I Rite? Come on Dougie! I no u can get a hit one of these times! Hit a HR!"
Or maybe "If the Yankees would have just hit the ball every so often, we'd be 25-18! No need to panic!"
A follow up question. If the team continues to play like this, at one point is it no longer negative to say this team needs a miracle to make the playoffs? Another week? two? Three?
You say it's a little extreme, and you may be right. It's just my observations.
You're right, sometimes they do pull those pitches with authority, but they usually don't.
It's not about forgetting how to hit, it's about giving yourself the best chance to get a hit with each at-bat. Trying to pull that outside pitch doesn't appear to be the best way to maximize one's chances for success.
If you watched Boston tonight, you'll have noticed how often they just hit the ball where it was pitched. Youklis and Ortiz both did masterful jobs of that and in my humble opinion, the ability to do that with consistency is the difference between a winning team and a losing one.
At least, it seems to be a major factor.
And I still believe Arod shouldn't be swinging through fat fastballs.
Of course it's harder than it looks, but I don't think that's the issue.
Arod swung through that pitch because he refused to shorten his swing.
Sometimes I actually do see Matsui take that outside pitch the other way, which is why it puzzles me that he doesn't do it more often.
In some situations it pays to gamble on hitting a double or a homerun, in others, it's best to pass the baton, as it were, to play pepper and keep the inning going.
Frankly I don't think stressing fundamentals can be extreme, I mean, they're fundamentals, not special super powers I'm looking for.
Anyway, your point is taken.
You complain about the site and then say Papeljerk like you're 12.
As far as the injury, 94 and no one stood a chance. Did you actually watch the game?
Regarding the injuries that have befallen the Yankees pitching prospects and designated fifth starters du jour, did you not think there would eventually be karmic payback for Small and Chacon? George may be able to torch $200M on "talent," but apparently the devil cannot be bought.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.