Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
According to George King, the Yankees and Red Sox are both interested in Pittsburgh reliever, Mike Gonzalez, a southpaw. Boston has its hands full as they work on signing D. Matsuzaka this week, a deal that despite all of the posturing, I expect will get done.
I've been saying all along that I thought it would get done (Sox/Matsuzaka), but I'm beginning to really think it's not going to happen. I posted about it both at COH and Matsuzaka Watch.
If the Mets, Yankees, Rangers, and maybe Cubs are all waiting in the background to pay Matsuzaka $100 million over 6 years, plus the posting fee, why would he take $12 million or $14 million over 6?
If he waits it out for another year, Boras can make up the difference in lost salary by supplementing his Seibu pay with HUGE endorsement deals. It will prove a minor blow to his reputation, but he'll recover just fine if he heads to the Majors a year later and wins the Cy Young. It'll be forgiven if he helps to lead Seibu to a title next year, which is very possible.
In the end, the Sox have zero leverage.
A posting fee of $51 million and 6 years at $72 million is $20.5 million a season.
The difference is, in scenario #1 Matsuzaka and Boras make $28 million more over the course of the contract. Wouldn't you hold out a year for that?
It's a nice piece of verbal jiujitsu if you ask me.
you'd undoubtedly argue they are making a huge mistake if they signed an unproven MLB caliber player to Boras' demands of $20 mil a year as well. my question is how do they NOT make a huge mistake in this situation?
If Matsuzaka wins another title for Seibu next year, and still gets them their money, no one will care. Trust me.
Boston's only mistake in this whole thing was outbidding the 2nd place Mets by 13 million. If they'd bid $40 million, and offered Matsuzaka 6 years, $90 million, it would be an average expenditure of $21 million. That's steep for an unproven guy, but the annual salary of $15 million is reasonable, and the extra $6 million per year in posting money could easily be written off creatively.
An extra $13 million makes it all but impossible to offer a Boras client, which they knew he was in advance of their posting bid, top dollar. It was a terrible blunder than cost them the player and maybe more. They look completely ridiculous. Epstein and Lucchino's press conference was pathetic. My favorite part was Theo saying all doe eyed:
"We do have plans to meet tomorrow and at that time will present a second offer, an improved offer."
When he said, "An improved offer" he looked totally panicked. He kind of swallowed hard, raised his voice to a higher pitch, and looked over at Lucchino. They know he's not coming for a penny less than $15 million a year, if at all.
The Red Sox are acting as if bidding the $51.1 means that they can pay Matsuzaka peanuts. They want to pay him as if he is projected as a back of the rotation guy. I don't understand how they can think that this is good business.
As for Matsuzaka, if he cared about his reputation being tarnished by wanting a large contract in Japan and just playing in the U.S., he would have never hired Boras as his agent and the Red Sox knew this when they entered the bidding the process.
In the end, I still see the deal getting done with Matsuzaka getting a salary close to what he deserves.
The thing is: He absolutely has to live up to expectations, and even as many have said the chances of that are pretty likely, when's the last time this much hype has been met in baseball and for a pitcher? Further if he does meet those ridiculously high expectations, they then have to pay for a huge extension in a few years.
Why do I keep thinking the rivalry will be on life support this time next year? Too many things have to break right for Theo to keep his job. The vulchers in Boston will be fighting over that flesh.
there's no killing the rivalry... at least not in these here parts. sox fans (generally speaking) are single-mindedly focused on how their team stacks up against the bombers. this is a fan base that pre-2003 would chant slogans touting the vaccous nature of the yankees as their own team was losing to the orioles. i've seen it 1st hand. it is the sound of insecurity.
that said, both teams have their share of question marks. this year will be really interesting.
how many days until pitchers and catchers report?
I agree with everything you say.
Brilliantly misplayed Theo.
"They sign JD Drew to an outrageous salary and then low ball their young potential ace Matsuzaka and their fan base all over the Internet don't see the contradiction. "
are you guys taking crazy pills? if there was talk about the yanks paying an MLB amateur (non FA) $20 mil you guys would be foaming at the mouth. besides, whats ridiculous is that sox bought sole negotiating rights and BORAS DID NOT MAKE A COUNTEROFFER or NEGOTIATE in any way! Boras should spend less time planning the demise of the posting system and more time sitting arcoss a table with teams trying to make the deal.... am I wrong?
I think the whole cultural imperative thing is overplayed.
Offering a guy the same amount of money as Adam Eaton is an insult. Screw the posting money. You didn't have to spend it. The Yankees would have gladly paid $35 million and ponied up for Boras. You guys just got in the way and turned cheap after you strapped on the big balls to win the pissing contest.
he seems to love the drama, and even more than that, getting his name in papers.
Nite.
The Sox have a decent lineup but they absolutely have to be carried by Papi and Manny. They've got injury prone guys at CF, C, 3B, RF, and an unproven rook at 2B. Their rotation consists of two 40 yo guys, a "rookie" coming back from injury who's never thrown more than 150 innings in a year, a headcase, and an international man of mystery (if they sign him). And they still don't have a bullpen.
The Yanks have a shaky rotation, but I'd argue that at least it's pretty much a known commodity. Their lineup is even moreso. You know what you're going to get from both - many more runs scored than allowed. And they have nice organizational depth to make a trade or cover up injuries if they need to.
I'm more worried about Toronto than Boston.
I don't think the Red Sox look ridiculous at all.
LOL
When the bid came out, the soxoholix were linking to a certain prosthetic that enhances size in that area. Theo must have had his strapped on and feeling mighty.
and you know this how exactly? im not trying to start a flame war, i just feel like its a very valid argument that Boras' demands may be a little much? and then he compares to the FA, which Matsuzaka is not. Bora is obviously not happy with the rules and he's trying to overcome them.
Which, honestly, was very stupid, especially given the size of the bid. Every team that lost instantly had an incentive to make sure the Sox paid every last penny.
And, from the Sox's perspective, it makes only too much sense. If the kickbacks worked, the Sox could 'give in' to Boras - even say 4 years/$52 mil + $25M in the posting fee = 4 years/$77M, or just under $19M/year.
The icing on the cake would have been trading Manny and his - wait for it - $20M/year salary.
Oops.
When was the last time a Boras client got a contract that seemed fair. The guy is just an amazing example of the profession. He does his job and does it well. Das it.
You better believe we would have been foaming at the mouth. But it would have been much earlier in the process. Why? Because the Yankees wouldn't have bungled things so badly afterwards. Damon got done in three days. A-Rod in less time than that. If the Yanks won the bid, it would have gotten done in a very low-key way. And everyone would have bemoaned their spending power and criticized them.
Instead, the vast majority of RSN was giddy at the bid. 90% of the local and national media praised them. And the organization has bungled everything since, includiong their FA spending spree and Manny. Go read Mnookin today. He's spot on after yesterday he said what you're saying about Boras. Your FO is to blame for thinking they could be smarter than everyone else. The shit's about to hit the fan and the feces will be flying everywhere over the next year.
Yes. You are wrong. Boras should do exactly what he's doing. Try to get the most money possible for his client. That's his job. That's why players hire him. They don't hire him to make friends or even, and I know this may come as a shock to you, set up the best deal for the Red Sox. It's the dollars. Plain and simple.
whats this bungling you speak of? the sox made an offer several days ago that was unanswered. i always thought it is a bad idea to bid against yourself.
"and I know this may come as a shock to you, set up the best deal for the Red Sox."
genius remark!
And just for shits and giggles, if DM does match expectations then we'll have a competitive season on our hands.
I love this game!
The real question becomes, will Boston let money stop this deal too?
No the Yanks would have got him signed, sealed, and delivered. We would have all complained about the cash, but it would have gotten done over three days.
"Alright Theo, since you overpaid on the posting fee, my client will take $8.50 an hour as long as he can live in the clubhouse."
"DONE!"
Your Red Sox believe him to be a front of the rotation guy! That's why they bid what they did. That being said, he should then make front of the rotation money. Gil Meche is making $11 million a year for the next 5. Gil Meche! Don't get pissed at Boras for not accepting the Sawx's joke of an offer, get mad at Theo and crew for making a bid so high that they're struggling to close the deal.
hhhmmm.... counter-offer?!
its becoming increasingly clear that you are 100% right. ans most likely this would apply to any team that won the bid; not just the red sox.
30 is exactly right.
They let A-Rod get away over a few bucks. They let Damon get away over a few bucks. Both Boras clients.
However, they overpaid for Nancy Drew. They overpaid for Varitek. Both Boras clients.
The choice seemed very clear very early on. Either overpay or don't bid. The Sox FO wanted it both ways - probably by spinning the bid amount into the contract. Too bad they're too "smart" for their own good.
However, they overpaid for Nancy Drew. They overpaid for Varitek. Both Boras clients."
so you're telling me they don't want to pay the agent's asking price on some players and overpay on some other players. im failing to see a point here....
A simple question here: Does anyone on this board believe in rc/27 outs?? By that measure Hafner, Howard, Pujols, Manny and Berkman were the best five offensive players in all of MLB last year---that does seem reasonable, right?
So when JD Drew shows up as the #24th best RC/27 and he can play center why is this a bad signing?? He does miss 'some' games each year, but his major injuries are the result of being beaned---do we hold that against him??
The guy has put up more runs on the board per out than Soriano every year, if I were a Yankee fan this is the one signing that I think I'll look back at and wish wouldn't have happened.
Lugo = 36 mil/4
Alex G = 14 mil/3
That same 20 mil (~5mil/year) difference could easily kill the DM negotiations. And the difference between Lugo and A-Gon is .60 in career OPS but the latter plays significantly better defense!
I love this game!
Life is good here at the Banter. Even though we got knocked out of the postseason early, there has been plenty to be happy about: the sawx finished 3rd behind the Jays of Blue, we've had a very productive hot stove season without moving George to the poorhouse, and we've got a new sawxer to tell us how dumb we are while we laugh at him. Good times.
"Alright Theo, since you overpaid on the posting fee, my client will take $8.50 an hour as long as he can live in the clubhouse."
you're right! uninsightful non-intelligent comments like this are a laughing matter.
45 I think Atlanta would be the third team in the deal.
I think the only error the Sox made is that they underestimated the significance of what they were doing. When I heard that they had bid $51.1MM, my thought was "Theo's all in -- this decision will make or break his career as a GM." Strangely enough, it seems like he didn't realize this at the time.
The thing with D-M is/was: Once you made the decision to bid an enormous amount of money to get the negotiating rights, you really had no choice but to follow through at any cost. You truly are "all in." (And this would have been true for any franchise that did it.) Because...
a) Failure to sign him will wreak massive fan and local media criticism upon your franchise
b) Failure to sign him may have a lasting negative effect on your image in Japan and your ability to do business there
And in the case of either the Yanks, Mets or Sox
c) Failure to sign him would leave you scrambling to sign a FA pitcher after much of the market was already gone (Zito for 6x$18MM anyone?)
If you ask me, the only franchise that really realized the full implications of the whole situation was probably the Mariners -- which is why they got out of it early, and very publicly.
one hand, you have the Red Sox trying to justify offering D-Mat an Adam
Eaton-type deal, and on the other, you have Boras claiming he should be
paid $100mn over five years. That doesn't sound like the parties are very
close. All along, I think the Red Sox believed that they would have all
the leverage in the negotiation, but now they are finding out otherwise.
For example, Boras already has the Red Sox flying across country uninvited
to offer a second proposal. As a result, the Sox are essentially bidding
against themselves. Consider the following quote from Theo:
"It's highly unusual but again signing Matsuzaka is extremely important to
the Boston Red Sox and we're very committed to making sure that happens,"
Epstein said. "Although it's normally not good policy to make a second
offer without receiving a counteroffer, we want to demonstrate to
Matsuzaka and to fans of Japanese baseball around the world just how
important this is to us. Matsuzaka represents more than himself. He really
represents the entire nation of baseball fans who have been looking
forward to this day."
I think that statement represents a change in strategy for the Red Sox.
Instead of relying on Matsuzaka having to return to Japan as leverage,
they are playing the "national pride" card. If they aren't careful,
however, that tact could backfire on them. After all, isn't the Japanese
national treasure worth a salary of $20mn? Then again, Theo might just be
laying the ground work for saving face if a deal can't be reached?
Clearly, the Red Sox are going to have to pay a lot more for D-Mat than
they originally thought. I have a feeling they expected they would be able
to recoup some of the posting fee by means of a side deal with Seibu. I
also think they figured they'd be able to strong arm Matsuzaka into
accepting a discounted deal. With both scenarios coming apart, the price
tag keeps becoming more prohibitive. Some observers have suggested that at
the price it will take to sign him, the Red Sox may actually be better off
letting him go. Personally, I think that would be such an embarrassment
that a better solution would be to compromise with Boras and sign a
shorter deal for a smaller annual value, while forgoing arbitration rights.
In addition to Theo's comments, the words of Boras are also intriguing:
"One thing is clear -- D-Mat will someday be a major league player," Boras
said. "We have further negotiating to do. The deadline's not here in five
minutes. The parties do understand what this player's value is in the free-
agent system."
Maybe I am having too much fun with this, but it seems to me as if Boras
has a major card up his sleeve. Perhaps, he is planning to "buy" D-Mat's
rights from Seibu? I am sure he could afford to do it maybe $25mn from
Boras to Seibu, plus a percentage of both the contract and certain other
salaries (i.e., endorsements and personal services)? That might be
fanciful, but there doesn't seem to be any rule that would prevent it.
Anyone have a conspiracy theory to share? Or, does the conventional wisdom
that the deal "has to get done" still hold?
However, I completely agree with the rest of your post. From jump, I argued that all the teams that bid on Matsuzaka were serious because they understood that this was huge deal. They have to get the signing done out of need for an ace. Additionally, their reputation and future business relationships with Japanese teams and fans would be destroyed. No team would enter the process and risk their reputation just to block another team. Ultimately, this is why I see the Red Sox getting the deal because if not ... it be will be ugly for them for awhile.
ric, this is where you chime in with something along the lines of "I'm not angry, you guys are just idiots"
As for the conspiracy theories, MLB has consistently said either DM signs with the Sox or he goes back to Japan. I think we have to take them at that. As with the JD Drew draft, I don't see MLB killing one of its rules just because Boras roughed up one team. He's been doing that for years.
your posts have not provided any evidence that you have an opinion about baseball. im glad you're happy to have me though!
Wonder why all that stopped after a certain five game series in August?
59 Here's an opinion: Uncle Theo lost all of his negotiating edge to make a "reasonable" deal with Boras when he bid $51.1 million for Matsuzaka. What that communicates to the agent is: we really, really, really want this player, and we think he's worth an exorbitant amount. That much is unrefutable.
So then you're the agent, sitting at the negotiating table with a man who just bid $51.1 million just to talk to you. And that man says (with his salary offer) that your client is worth less than Gil Meche and Adam Eaton. The two actions (high bid, lowball offer) are contradictory and it makes sense why Boras has backed off and decided to play the posturing game. He was insulted.
I'm assuming based on your posts that you don't have a job that involves sales or negotiating in anyway. Let me help you out: say you're selling a used car. The buyer has already said "I must get this car today!" (nullifying his leverage). You think the car is worth $10,000. The buyer says "I'll pay no more than $2,000." This is a lowball. The next step from the seller's standpoint is not to "counter-offer" as you suggest, but to act insulted. The whole purpose of the lowball tactic is to bring the seller far below what he thinks his product is worth.
This might work for Theo in an open market against a less experienced agent. But this is a closed market with the best agent in the history of sports. Theo needs to make a more reasonable offer first, if this deal is going to get done.
A valid point. Sucks when your career is all in and your boss can't decide whether or not to back you up. :-)
i dont work in sales but i study law and offer and acceptance under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts doesn't mention anything about acting insulted... but I understand what you mean about pragmatic negotiations. it doesnt seem fair to me to not get a response when you have bid $$ based upon a limited negotiations time window (moreso than the open market). besides, i thought the offer came before these ridiculous meche and eaton signings
Dude is ruthless.
A negotiation can't be judged until it's done but so far Boras looks like he's a man among boys.
Boston cut its throat early on in this. They made that huge bid to obtain his rights and allowed their pitching strategy to evolve into one of "we have to have this guy". They then tried to get cheap on him. They should have made an up front reasonable take it or leave it offer and hunkered down and forced Boras to come to them. If they wanted to they could have used negotiations with other pitchers on the market as leverage and shown a willingness to go in other directions. When they were accused of "blocking" a simple reply of " (I)t's not our fault the other MLB teams interested misread the situation. Our offer is a reasonable one in this market. Stick it in your ear" would suffice. Instead they fell into the trap of believing they have to have the guy and once Boras understood that they were his pigeon. It isn't over but my sense is it may as well be.
They may still get the kid and I expect them to but this seems like a lousy way to run a rail road or a negotiation for that matter.
If life was fair I wouldn't be so much better looking than all of you, but that's just the way it is.
If the issue is indeed $$$$, then how do these negotiations effect the Manny Ramirez situation.
let's assume that Boras is now forcing the Sox FO to make offers that they were originally unwilling to make. And let's also assume that should the Sox actually close the deal with Boras, that MLB will not let Theo renegotiate the agreement with the Seibu Lions and therefore force the Sawx to actually pony up the $51mil that they bid.
So if Theo and Co. fork out approx. $110mil ($51mm posting and the reported $60mm contract) on top of the $100mm+ for Drew and Lugo, then they might very well be forced to trade away Manny's contract in order to keep some sort of financial flexibility for '07.
So, to simplify a rather long and convoluted premise above, is Boras forcing the Sawx to choose between Mats or Manny? if so, I'm ALL FOR the Sox getting Mats and trading Manny out of the AL East.
Does anyone read this scenario similarly?
46 "Melky + Proctor for Gonzalez is a ripoff." After I read that, I've been mumbling: in Cashman I trust, in Cashman I trust...
If true, are the Sox still interested in Mike Gonzalez?
13 Boras is playing it perfectly. Theo and Larry are flying to Boras's home in CA to get it done. Boras will get to negiciate at his favorite resturant, get DM his money, and stick Theo with the bill for the meal.
26 Should a guy who makes pork sausages be talking about 'flying feces'?
33 No Ric.... the lack of counter offer said that the Sox offer wasn't even enough to open discussions. Did it work? Where are Theo and Larry now? Flying to Boras's house. Theo packet a suit, 2 shirts and 10 pair of underwear.
34 Boras has TONS od leverage. If DM is NOT signed, the Sox (not Boras) will have caused an international incident. When the Sox have another sucky year (without DM), all of RSN and every pundit will say 'if they only signed DM'. Not to mention the Yankees signing DM next year. Shit doesn't stick to Boras. The Sox HAVE to get this done.
40 Chris - good point. RC/27 is an important stat, but when you pay big dollars, you are really looking to buy RC/27 * 162.
RC/27 108 games = RC/18 162 games. RC/27 is a talent evealuator. RC/season is what counts to the FO.
[Everybody] Question: Does Boras have the final say, or does DM? If Boras wants 15m/yr, he may stand pat. But DM could see 12-13/yr as enough and pull the trigger.
I still think the deal will get done for around 12m/yr.
We saw what Proctor and Farnsworth could do in the AL East last season, for better or worse, and trading Proctor+ for another late inning RP makes no sense to me. (Especially if it is rumored to be Melky which is insane).
The Yankee bullpen, with Mo, Proctor, Farns, Bruney, Myers, Leftie yet to be determined (Schoeneweis?), and then some combo of Britton, Beam, JB Cox, Jeff Karstens, Rasner, Sean Henn, Steven White etc. should be a fine penn with numerous young options.
Julio Lugo for $9 million/year is insane, though.
I'd be throwing up in my mouth too if it was the Yankees trying to pay that money to a guy who has yet to pitch one inning in MLB. I actually hope the Sox sign him - better they figure out his value.
A 15 mil avg/year would get the deal done. That's disgusting but it's reality. Tell me ric, would rather: a) A-Gon and DM; or Lugo and no DM. Because that 20 mil difference could very likely end up being the deal breaker. Stupid planning if you ask me.
Further, they could have saved even more cash on Nancy, and went with a Pena/??? platoon in RF, and traded Pena+ for one of the big free agents (Rowand, Jones, etc.). The problem of course is that they were planning to trade Manny. Oops indeed 23.
Could that happen? Of course.
Practically speaking, Boras and DM probably discussed all their options from the beginning - including not signing a contract. It would be foolish for Boras to do otherwise, and Boras is not a fool. I'd bet DM is looking for a very large amount - why else go with Boras? - and trusts Boras to do his thing and get him that money. If its close enough, at the last second, DM might say, "OK". But if its not, DM might agree to go back and try this again next year, to try to get the money.
66 MFD, great read on the negotiations. I think you're right, especially about the bid being the root cause of all the trouble.
On the backup catcher front, it's possible that Yorvit Torrealba could be a non-tendered free agent at midnight tonight. I think that would be a solid choice. Would be nice to have someone who can crack a .700 OPS back there. And he's still just 28.
i never understood the infatuation with Lugo... i alway have considered SS the position where defense is essential and offense should be sacrificed (ala pokey reese)lugo doesnt seem to be worth his contract.
I think the Sox have a very valid argument when they propose to pay $8-10mm/year for Matz based on his ZERO experience in MLB but by bidding an insane $51mm for the rights to even talk to him they have essentially screwed themselves.
I think the deal will get done for about $12mm/year, however if I were the Sox and their fans, I'd be very very very nervous that, a) Matz would be a bust a la Irabu/Contreras or b) he gets hurt. The anxiety surrounding Matz on my team would eat away at me and diminish my joy for that team.
I rather the Sox fans live with that anxiety, thank you. Plus, the Nancy Drew Chronicles in Boston should result in enough heartburn by itself.
However, considering all the crazy offers that have taken place this offseason, one can only conclude that this situation works in Boras' advantage.
Offering Matsuzaka anything less than 10 million/yr simply doesn't make sense as most expect Matsuzaka to be a front totation guy (Now I know there's whole another discussion we can get into). And if Meche can get a 55mil/5yr deal, I think Matsuzaka deserves more than 7-9 mil/year (reportedly as the initial offer by the Red Sox).
I always thought Cashman knew better (because there is still indeed posting fee involved this time around)which was why he didn't try to pursue Matsuzaka as hard as most people thought. There is always a possibility for a trade once he proves himself.
70 That underwear joke was the funniest thing I've heard in a while.
I really hate this reasoning. Have you ever been to a Yankees game? Or watched one on their giant television network? Have you ever bought memorabilia? Where do you think that money goes? That's like saying you don't care what the American government does, because it's their money, not yours. We all have a bit of stake in this team, because the massive amounts of money they have are collected from fans like us. I for one would like to see them spend my money wisely.
Oh, and the list of the possible non-tenders includes Ben Broussard. Now that would be a bat I can handle at first base. But the Mariners will probably tender him, then trade him. Which I would do, for the right price.
Cashman seems to be shopping where there are sales this year, instead of being distracted by shiny displays at the expensive stores. Me like.
What if Cash signs him for, oh say, $8-10 per? Obviously that's a bad idea in a baseball sense, but if Kei Igawa is making $10M/year as a projected #5 guy, what's Matsuzaka worth? The market for Matsuzaka is already high enough, and this move would probably make the Yankees FO look incredibly unintelligent, but Boras could presumably use it as leverage to nullify the "unknown quantity" argument in terms of Japanese pitching value.
If I were Cash$, and I knew the DM negotiations were struggling, wouldn't Thursday at about 6PM be the PERFECT time to announce this signing? The thought of the possible implications of such a devious endeavor have made me giddy. My apologies.
Me like too.
And he's aware of when he can get 50% off, like Abreu. Even the three pitchers for Sheff was a steal. The Sux would have taken that for Manny.
teams charge for tickets, merchandise, tv contracts, etc. irrespective of player salaries. A number of studies have been conducted regarding a correlation between ticket prices and player salaries and there really is no corellation. A team bases its ticket, food and beverage, and merchandise prices to essentially sell the most seats at the highest prices fans are willing to pay. Paying a player a lot of money and then raising ticket prices doesn't work...the most notable case in which this was attempted and failed was with Tom Hicks and the Dallas Stars a number of years ago. Thus, whether or not the Yankees have a higher payroll has little to do with their ticket prices. If the team was winning just as many games with the payroll the size of say, Kansas City's, the rational economic decision would be to charge just as much for tickets as they do now, and this is exactly how the CFOs and Team Presidents Operate. Bob Nicholson, former CFO of the Washington Nationals and Montreal Expos, has spoken at length about this subject in many publications. If you'd like, I could dig up some old links for you...
I think he knows what hes doing and he'll get a 1b and a backup Catcher in here soon.
I was wondering whether somehow Ca$hman let Boras know what kind of a contract he'd give DM were there to be a free agent bidding, thus making it clear how much Matsuzaka would be giving up by signing now.
My immediate reaction to the bid, weeks ago, was that it was too high and the Red Sox had made it economically impossible to sign their prey. My confidence has been ebbing since then, but now Mike Plugh has sent it skyrocketing! I'm also very happy to see David Pinto's latest paean to Boras.
I also strongly disagree with the notion that it is too expensive to attend baseball games, even at Yankee Stadium. Between the discounts offered and the ability to bring food into the ballpark, the average cost of attending a game is well below most other forms of entertainment. I have a Friday evening plan at YS and when I factor in the free ticket coupons they give plan holders, the average ticket price is less than $15. The notion that we as fans "pay the players salaries" is just plain silly. We pay for a product we enjoy...plain and simple. The price of a ticket isn't a contribution; it is consideration for something of value in return: the entertainment of attending a baseball game.
And for the record, "irregardless" is not actually a meaningful word. Breaking it down... ir = not, less = without... so it means "not without regard," a double negative. Yes, both of my parents were English teachers.
102 RLYW also had a feature on him, Fabian bumped Garcia down considerably (#20 among all Yankees prospects) because of the surgery. He's still just 22 though, so hopefully he'll bounce back. Tommy John surgery is so successful nowadays.
williamnyy23- now that is some straight up Contracts Law... and all you need is a peppercorn of consideration!
not sure if Big Ben will be a non-tender option. nomaas mentions Brad Wilkerson. even though he's lefty, he's got reverse splits.
i'd be down with Yorvit Torrealba. i'd LOVE to hear the "Voice of God" say his name! not to mention the Yankee related "Torre & Alba." btw, a buddy of mine emailed me two Jessica Alba photos today. GOOD LORD! : O
there'd be some poetic justice for Igawa to shut down the BoSux at The Fens whilst the Bombers go Wall Ball against Dice-K. could happen!
not sure we need Mike G., but if the price is right... Paulino would be fine, too. Proctor & the Melk Man is a steep price though. Atl. may very well move Rochey. I live in the ATL and while he had a pretty good season, i can't stand watching that guy...
someone PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE tell me what "MFD" stands for!!! i've been trying to figure it out for ages and simply cannot... : ~
[110} Ditto re: MFD. WTF?
https://bronxbanter.baseballtoaster.com/archives/343323.html
Oh, the good old days. Before I got here. And before Rob Gee was banned.
108 And Garcia's surgery is apparantly the same one that Mariano Rivera had in the minors, so he's in good company.
Man, the Banter is awesome.
He cites Olney's piece today but he conveniently leaves aside the original homer - Gammons. And while I can't read that piece without dropping trou and bending over for the ESPN tyranny, the preview and title suggest he thinks the Sux should just pony up the cash required. Love it PG! Especially because he couldn't praise them enough with the bid.
"There was some initial speculation that this was defensive maneuver on our part," Lucchino said. "We wanted to disabuse people of that notion and make it clear that this was a commitment to Matsuzaka-san..."
disabuse?
i read both Alex and Cliff, individually, religiously for a long while now. just never posted til recently.
thanks for clearing up the MFD, guys - 'preciate it!
btw, my Pop transferred from NYU to Hofstra back in the day just so he could play Baseball there. guess he's a fellow flying dutchman... i used to play the Newsday Marching Band festivals every year at Hoftstra...
118 Union college.
And I'd like to point out that RI Yankee using "ironical" (a non word) in 107 to describe his previous use of "irregardless" is indeed quite the irony, in the quite frequently misunderstood literary sense, as opposed to the Alanis Morsette sense.
Digging, I found a bunch of good memories. Remember when Michael Kay used to check out the women in the stands in between innings? And you could hear him on mlb.tv.
turns out BOTH pitch backs have survived a good 1/4 century! my pop did not use 2x4's, but 1" pieces to make it nice and sturdy. they were by 3 or 4 inches. that was pretty much all that was needed, though the hooks in the ground could still add some added security.
i must've been hallucinating about the "X" in the middle. the box is simply a ribbon that is weaved through the webbing. i was probably confusing it with the strikezone we had on the basement wall, replete w/ the "X," like we would draw with chalk to play stickball at local schoolyards. (man, i miss stickball...)
my 'tennis balls only' rule was off, too. hard balls are fine... my dad is surprised the elasticity has lasted a solid 25 years. both pitch backs are in use w/ my little nephews, the younger of whom is a little lefty slugger and BIG Yankees fan! these kids even get their own baseball cards in little league. how cool!
in summary, the Hank Aaron endorsed, Little League approved Pitch Back of the 70's kicks ass. so does the Banter for causing and allowing such conversations to commence!
(That would be sweet)
"For once, the Yankees are on the sidelines for a circus."
The Boston Zoo is officially open for business. Though I guess it really opened when it obtained the first Gorilla Manager known to man.
Ah, the days of playing modern stickball in the Brooklyn school yards. Winding up and doing my darndest to throw a 70mph fastball past my friends' stickball bats.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stickball
we drew a strikezone on the brick wall. hit the fence on 1 bounce = double; on a fly = triple; over the fence = homer.
we played in the mid-late 80's on Long Island. there was 1 kid who was a "real" pitcher. fast fastballs, moving curve balls, etc. no one could hit him. no one. wasn't even fun...
donnie and pags made it worth it, though.
re: alex /#13
wayne tolleson wore #2 in those days.
...oh how far we've come.
j/k ; )
btw, i think bobby meachem is a major league coach. rox maybe...?
http://tinyurl.com/y49ozx
btw, can you italicize here?
"btw, can you italicize here?"
no, but by putting an asterisk before and after text, it becomes bold.
ask kylepetterson for a demonstration sometime...
anyway, thanks again, you all ROCK!
Good Point, but Drew isn't as fragile as everyone thinks:
2006- 146 games, that's 90% of the season. I'll take 90% of a season of Drew than 96% of a season from Carlos Lee.
2005- 72 games. Broken hand via HBP---is this his fault??
2004- 145 games, awesome season again 145 ain't bad.
2003- 100 games, again beaned.
Last four years he's been pretty healthy beyond getting hit by pitches and having his hands broken, I suppose that could continue, but I doubt it.
Maybe I'm just dumb, but I thought he was the best FA out there bar none. I guess we'll see in a few months
If he goes back to Seibu, he earns $9 M over the next two years.
Let's say, for arguments sake, the Sox hold to $10 M annually over six years. Matsuzaka would then earn, with endorsements, estimated to be $20 M annually by Rosenthal if he plays MLB, $60 M over the next two years.
Playing out his two years in Japan before becoming a FA, he loses $51 M in that time.
Over the following four years, he would have to draw an MLB salary of $22.75 M to make up his losses from 2007-2008, the $10 M hypothetical figure, plus $12.75 M per year to make up the lost $51 M. And, of course, to do this, he'd not only have to continue to pitch effectively and retain his value, he'd also have to stay healthy.
In short, if Dice-K goes back to Japan, he is the guaranteed loser.
You guys are just grasping at straws to make yourselves feel better.
BTW: I love how Sox fans are already turning on DM, and not their front office. It's just like Damon all over again. DM could walk over $5 million a year ($10 vs. $15 million). That's the same $5 million a year they gave to Julio Lugo over A-Gon with only a marginal difference in value, if that. And they revisit the Damon mistake by signing the Anti-Damon in Nancy.
Good times!
anyone able to verify? i was unable to do so.
And, I agree, but he's pretty far from the 2004 Boy Wonder. Makes me think he just got very lucky the Nomah deal worked out so well. If the Yanks hadn't choked so bad, is Lord Theo even still the GM?
it would also keep him visible in this country regardless of whether he signs here right away or not.
...but he will play here in '07.
It's just that whoever they replace him with will be less smart and do a worse job.
"If there is no deal, then all bets are off," said Lou Melendez, the vice president of international operations for Major League Baseball. "They'd have to post him again next year because he can't be a free agent for two more years."
If true, this means that the Yankees and the Met get a chance to bid for Matsuzaka again. Can you imagine if the Yankees win the bid next year and sign Matsuzaka? Hysteria in throughout New England. So this is Boras' "real" leverage. Good times, my fellow Yankee fans, good times.
Here are some sources confirming that Matsuzaka becomes a free agent in May 2008:
http://tinyurl.com/yhaams (Fox)
http://tinyurl.com/y77e6l (MSNBC/Sporting News)
http://tinyurl.com/ynywdz (Hardball Times)
Actually, with the way things having been going for your third place team, you probably can't.
First off, if he let's himself get called "Dice-K", I can pretty much guarantee his loser status.
As far as your guarantee, you can get a good look at a butcher's ass by sticking your head up there. But, wouldn't you rather to take his word for it? No, I meant, you can get a good look at a T-bone steak by sticking your head up a butcher's ass... No, wait. It's gotta be your bull.
127 Thanks for the update on those Pitch Backs we talked about last night. Glad to hear that they are still in use.
110 I agree with you mehmattski about the salary issue. Even though I will also have to defer to alasky on the economics he stated in 90 about the higher salaries not resulting in higher ticket prices, it certainly seems like it happens the other way around. Teams that generate a ton of revenue from ticket sales, merchandise and TV contracts certainly are able to spend it on salaries.
102 "Who is Christian Garcia?"
The loser is Chris Berman, who's got to be counting down the days until he can call him Andrew Dice-K on air.
Would anyone here who happens to be a lawyer please forward their resumes to Cliff and Alex.
Something must be done about this!
I'd like to think it similar to people referring to Yankee Stadium as simply "The Stadium". There are plenty of places known as "______ Stadium", but there is only one known as "The Stadium".
Similarly, there might be a lot of blogs called "________ Banter", but there's only one blog people mean when they say "The Banter".
153 thanks for the props. B-O-L-D that spells BOLD for you and me. I just made that up. Right now. If that isn't BOLD, I don't believe I know what is.
It's way to late to separate the client from the agent on this one especially one who is not a native English speaker.
Is that panic I smell? The desperate hours are upon them; this should be fun.
Its not as good as dollar drafts night at Chet's - which, come to think of it, is something you didn't experience as an undergrad, given Chet's started in the early 90s - but it'll do.
187 Ha! I bet DM understands English well enough, but I also bet Boras speaks more (and better) Japanese than anyone who works for the Sox. Perhaps Theo and Larry are buying a "Japanese for Dummies" book right now? ;)
It really is funny to watch. Peter Abraham was right about the circus.
I think Boras speaks a very international language - MONEY. It's one understood by a host of different clients.
I don't think that DM has to speak much English or be brainwashed by Boras to see that signing a deal that pays him $10 million or less a year over 4 years means that his former team is making a lot more out of this transaction than he is.
Tha Red Sox screwed themselves when they made that ridiculously high bid since there was no way that Boras and DM were going to take any deal that paid Matsuzaka less than the posting fee. Especially with pitchers like Meche and Lilly making more than $10 mil a year.
http://tinyurl.com/ye3ck6
Courtesy of Canyon of Heroes. Sorry if it's already been posted or linked here.
I would imagine Sawx fans are not happy at this point. If they get it done though and DM delivers nobody will remember this other than the folks who want to get rid of this idiotic posting process.
He wants to be respected and paid. As well he should.
http://tinyurl.com/yeugqy
If that is the sticking point, why don't they give him a base of $10 mil a year (only 2-3 million more than they were planning to pay anyway) and put $4 mil in incentives in his deal? He makes the All Star game ($1 mil), he pitches 200 innings ($1 mil), he has 200 strikeouts ($1 mil). That way if he is a bust he ends up costing them roughly what Pavano costs us. If he is as good as everyone says he is, they aren't going to mind paying him the money.
what newspaper writer writes stories giving credit to the plauyers and their agents for getting top dollar??
not many. thats not how they think. they cant "sell" stories that way. they try to appeal to the average bum out there and defending boras doesnt do that.
also with boston be warned. the columnists got a very cozy relationship with the team. one reason is because the globe owns part of the sox. so the writers given that access have to fulfill there end of the bargain which is to spin that boston is doing its very best to get him signed. his agent is the big bad guy.
either enough sides will be satisfied enough and a deal will get done, or it won't, and D-MAt will still make 9 mil, Seibu will still have its star, the Sox will have aabout $100 mil to invest in some way or other. And, gasp, BORAS is the big loser (relatively speaking).
The Sox showed poor judgment in thinking that the amount they bid for DM would in any way reduce a contract that Scott Boras was negotiating. By making the amount they bid a part of the potential deal they wasted almost two weeks. Once they saw that they weren't getting any action on their original offer they should have shifted the focus of the negotiation to how much money was going to be guaranteed/base money, what, if any incentives were going to be part of the deal and what was the length of the contract going to be. Now, because Boras dug in and wouldn't even counteroffer, the BoSox have had to crawl to Boras' door and beg for the right to give DM money.
How is this badly mishandling things? Because they don't pay more than they want to? By that logic, did the Yankees mishandle Lilly by not overpaying for him, because they 'lost' him?
Frankly, I think that the real mistake would be if the Sox actually get led down the path to paying 15 mil/year for four years, making the whole deal worth 25+ mil/year for an unproven starting pitcher. What a millstone that contract would probaby prove to be.
Overpaying and/or panicking is, in my opinion, the worse mishandling than setting a firm budget and sticking to it. In fact, one could even argue that the Sox have played this perfectly--they tried to bootleg the system (and they still may get away with it). They failed, but in failing preventing other teams (including a divisional rival) from negotiating with the same player.
btw, I'm unclear about the panicking. Any good negotiator knows that if he wants more money, the longer he holds out the more likely he'll get it. Did anyone really think that this WOULDN'T go to the last minute?
That is essentially independent from the players 'value' as determined by his bargaining power. Once the Sox won the exclusive rights to negotiate with D-May (and exclusive negotiating will always drive down value), the negotiation becomes not what D-MAt is worth in some absolute or Platonic sense. Rather, it becomes what the Sox are willing to give v. what D-Mat is willing to take. Prsumable, he would be unlikely to take less than 9 mil/year, but there is little reason to expect that Sox should be compelled to bid much more than that.
Sure, D-Mat can hold out for more. But he may get injured. He may lose value if he ages a year or two. Of course, he may make more money. But that is his call, and really does not bear on the 'reasonableness' of the Sox offers relative to their own perceptions and budgets.
As for the question of who wouldn't think the negotiating would go to the last minute: you're roght, no one. Including the Sox. So all this glee at how the Sox (mis)handled negotiations is completely premature--undoubtedly they KNEW the negotiations would follow this course more or less.
Obviously, the Red Sox thought that it was enormously valuable to be able to negotiate with Matsuzaka, immensely valuable to them. That's why it just looks ridiculous if they now say, well, he's unproven, etc.
On the other hand, Matsuzaka doesn't care how much money the Red Sox gave Seibu. He cares how much they're going to offer him. The $51 shouldn't even be mentioned in the discussions between Bora and Epstein, because it's irrelevant. Uh. Irregardless.
That's true. I guess what I meant is that the Sox shouldn't be ridiculed for planning on spending, say, 20 mil/year (or 15 or 18 or whatever) on D-Mat, including the posting fee. They gambled that the 51 mil fee + contract would not exceed their budget, meaning a contract offer of 10 mil/year for four years (or some similar sum). D-Mat can take it or leave it--that's his call.
But it's not about what his 'value' is. He is only worth as much as he can get. It makes sense for the Sox to 'lowball' him. If he doesn't take the Sox offer, he makes 9 mil next year with Seibu, and no matter what, D-Mat doesn't play for the Yankees or any team not the Sox.
By the way, I'm now doubting all those articles I linked earlier that insisted Matsuzaka would become a free agent in May 2008. Mike Plugh linked a Japanese Times article that claims that although by May '08 he'll have enough seniority, he cannot really be a free agent till the end of that season. I asked Mike to clarify that if he can.
one i like the most.
Chin-Hui Tsao
personal reasons aside, he was very very highly touted. and reports here in Taiwan says he's practicing, so sounds like he's shoulder is alright, i would definately go for a incentive laden minor league deal on him.
a few other potentially good players
Brad Wilkerson
Joe Pineiro
Shawn Chacon
I think their error lays in not seeking other alternatives during the negotiation. They seem to have placed all their eggs in the DM basket and have therefore placed themselves in the unenviable position of having to go call on Mr. Boras after having delivered a second offer without receiving a counter offer from Boras on their initial offer. I think you're being overly generous to the Sawx on this one. Each signal sent to Boras by them appears to be one of need, desire and weakness. They had some leverage going in but by allowing their alternatives to DM to dwindle they are at best I think in a position of equipoise at this point. This hasn't been one for the text books from their POV.
I expect that they'll end up getting it done. I expect that they'll end up getting it done at a figure that's closer to Boras's minimum than their maximum. Then again I'm not in on what's happening so what the heck do I know other than what I've read.
There is a line 400 people deep in front of Circuit City. They have the last PS3 in the city left inside, and the manager decides to buy it. His supervisor gets the bright idea that they can make some money by offering the rights to negotiate for the machine to the highest bidder, who then must purchase the machine from the store manager.
One guys steps up and says he'll pay $510 for the rights to the machine. The 2nd place guy had bid $380, and is left with the other 398 saps shaking their heads.
The guy who won the bid goes into the store and offers the manager .50 cents on the dollar for the PS3. The store manager walks to the back room. The guy is left there waiting, and wondering why he can't get his game. Later, he walks into the back and says, okay I'll pay you .75 cents on the dollar, man. C'mon, I bid $510 just to get in here.
Meanwhile, the guy who bid $380 and his buddies were all willing to pay the going rate for the machine. If you were the manager, what would you do?
I'd boot the guy, and do the whole thing over the next day. (Actually, I'd offer it to the 2nd place guy, but that's against the rules).
It's so much clearer now!
:)
Either MLB or the Japanese leagues crated this whole mess by not allowing the Japanese team to move on to the next highest bidder if negotiations with the first team fall through. The whole scheme encourages lowball (by MLB standards) offers.
On the other hand, the extended negotiations have put a very bright spotlight on Mr. Boras during what is otherwise a very slow winter for super-agenting. And he does seem to love that attention, yes he does...
He had the best minor league trio of the 3 super arms from Taiwan (Wang / Tsao / Kuo ) but like the other two his health record was also spotty (though not nearly as horrific as Kuo's famous blowing out his elbow in pro ball debute kind)
he was rushed a bit, making the Bigs before even pitching in AAA. though his records in AA and below are staggering when healthy. including a 10.45 K/9 2.25 BB/9 and a 1.04 WHIP.
His stuff is a lot like Farnsworth's although his minor league record clearly suggest he's eon better.
the only real question is wether his shoulder is ok , but he is spotted here in Taiwan practicing again, so one would assume at least it's not too bad right now.
Look at it this way though, we have 40 man roster spots to spare, there's really no risk, he should be a exellent pitcher if he returns to form and get out of Coors. with the potential to be a dominant closer/setup or a front rotation starter.
I'm guessing the Rockies have a under the table deal to resign him, or else it doesnt make any sense to give up on him this easily.
According to this morning's Boston Herald, the Sox are offering $8 M, Boras is asking $11. (No mention of length of contract.) If this is true, it would seem to me that a deal will get done this morning. Hard to believe, though, that Boras is asking for such a reasonable contract; just not his MO.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.