I agree. Years from now when I talk about what it was like to watch Alex Rodríguez, the first thing I'll mention is how effortless it all looked. Isn't that usually the way with the great ones? I know it's been mentioned here before, but it's interesting to compare him to Sheffield. Sheff will take the most violent swing you've ever seen, send a laser into the bleachers, and it's fairly impressive. Then Rodríguez will come up, take a nice smooth swing, and the ball will land 500 feet away. I always knew he was great just from looking at the numbers he put up in Seattle and Texas, but I didn't truly appreciate him until this year, watching play at an incredible level on a daily basis. Give him the MVP right now.

I too never really appreciated A-Rod's abilities until I saw him playing daily. That is one sweet swing.

Texas made a grave error in trading him. Why would you ever give up an inner-circle Hall of Famer in his prime unless you got one in return? For "payroll flexibility"? BS. The $252 million contract was never the problem - the $65 million to Chan Ho Park, $9 million to Jeff Zimmerman (who was hurt the whole time) - those contracts were Texas's problem. That, and having developed no pitchers of their own since Kevin Brown and Kenny Rogers.

But I'm not complaining - their loss is our gain, and we got the best player in the game.

It is rare indeed to see a player who combines such Big Ball talent with such Small Ball smarts. He helps the team every single day. Even if he is in the midst of a batting slump, he's going to do something in the field or on the basepaths. When he's on a hot streak, pay attention, because you're witnessing one of the best ever. The naysayers who focus on the slap play are missing out.

Funny, talking about missing out with Rodriguez. As I wrote earlier this year I think that aside from his persona, the effortless that he exudes on the field is part of the reason why fans don't latch embrace him more.

I know this isn't really a good comparison, but Hank Aaron jumped to mind when I read the last comment. Until the final years of his career he played in the shadow of Willie Mays. In 1965, nobody would have thought that it would be him, not Mays, breaking Ruth's home run record.

Obvisouly, if he stays healthy over the next four seasons, Rodriguez will be considered a likely candidate to break the all-time homer mark. I don't think that Rodriguez has been underappreciated like Rickey Henderson and Bonds have been during stretches of their career, but he certainly hasn't been loved, or fully embraced either. Again, this might have something to do with his personality, and a lot to do with his contract.

But you are right: he's got a small ball smarts in a big bopper's body.

Not to discount A-Rod at all, because I believe he could be one of the greatest, but Texas did get Soriano and he sure isn't chump change!

Remember his homer against Schilling at Fenway (spoiling his "comeback) ????

What a smooth swing...especially compared with Sheffield's violent homerun cut.

The telecast showed about 6 different angles - the 'side view' revealed a laser - headed out of the park !!

I have become a big fan of his and hope he can carry this team.

What about Mo?

The fact that he put himself in the game last week makes me think he's MVP worthy :-).

Off-the-wall-topic-for-debate.
Assuming Bonds DOES come back and play, most probably in 2006, it looks probable that he won't break Aaron's record until 2007.

There is a good chance he would accept/promote a trade to the AL, where he could DH, without his knee's being an issue to playing time.

And big names, big money and AL make you think.... Yankees.
What say... would you give Bonds a 1 year contract (for 20 mil or so) to DH for us in 2007 and break Aaron's record (50/50 chance in Yankee Stadium)?