Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jonah Keri weighs in on Mike Mussina's fine career over at ESPN:
Mussina deserves to be a Hall of Famer, even if he never wins 20 games in a season, or 300 in his career for that matter.If you insist on using wins as a barometer, you could argue that only six pitchers in major league history have as many wins as Mussina, with a higher winning percentage: Hall of Famers Lefty Grove, Christy Mathewson, Grover Cleveland Alexander and Jim Palmer, and Roger Clemens and Randy Johnson, two of the 10 best pitchers of all time. If you're into fancier analysis, you could point to the Gray Ink, Hall of Fame Standards and Hall of Fame Monitor tests, all of which show Mussina with more than enough credentials to surpass the average player already enshrined in Cooperstown.
But the argument over Mussina's candidacy based on his (in)ability to win 20 games in a season raises a bigger issue: Baseball's media and fans (mostly the media) butcher the numbers in their attempts to evaluate a player's accomplishments, or his overall worth.
Without doing the heavier research, I think that using wins as a qualifier has made it a lot more difficult to gain entry to the hall as a pitcher, unless the guy gets voted in by his buddies on the veteran's committee, than a position player. There are, by my count, 70 pitchers in the Hall versus 157 position players. The biggest problem for a pitcher, IMO, are the more frequent career-threatening/-ending injuries. The very nature of pitching makes it difficult to pitch in the bigs for 20 years to amass the 300 wins compared to one of the many offensive milestones.
Hell, I'd be amenable to Cone being inducted - he was a damn good pitcher for most of his career, even with losing the parts of several seasons to injury. And he won 20 games, to boot.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.