Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
I don't know about you guys but I find ESPN's wall-to-wall coverage of the Little League World Series to be more than somewhat disturbing. I'm generally not a moralist by nature but I'm just so turned off by watching kids televised as if they were professionals. It doesn't seem right to me, it feels like too much pressure is being placed on them too soon. How can they just kick back and have fun?
This year, the coverage is more pronounced than ever as highlights make their make nightly onto Sportscenter and Baseball Tonight. I simply turn the channel. I just won't watch it.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Kids grow up way too fast these days.
1. Intense pressure put on kids as if they were pros
2. Fences were brought in (in the '90s?) for more HRs and offense. Great message there.
3. Announcers saying stupid things about how this or that 10 year old needs to work on his curve ball.
4. Glorifying insane coach-dads.
5. 19th century nationalism played out with children. Frankly, I hate "national" sports in general. Do I really need to national chauvinism in sports? Do I want to see Bernie suit up for Puerto Rico? Sports can be a great tool for integration, so we instead use to highlight division and potentially conflict. And with kids too.
6. If you lose Bobby, you fail America. See #5 and #1 above.
7. Announcers unwittingly saying stupid and bigoted things, like how "disciplined" or "organized" the Japanese team is, but how the American team loves to have fun.
8. Seemingly endemic cheating and lying about age.
Forget it. When I want to watch little league, I just go down the block and take a look at the neighborhood kids playing.
On the one hand, I think its great that the kids' extended family and friends can see them play on TV. OTOH, highlights seem to be a bit much, especially because I'm sure ESPN jazzes them up. Let the kids have fun and not worry about making the highlight reels.
My nephew played in the Little League tournament this year. They made it through two district tournaments, and were one win away from making the regional tournament to qualify for Williamsport. They lost by one run in the final game, when the second base umpire failed to see the tag on what should have been an inning-ending 4-3 double play, because he was watching the run score at home plate instead of the play right in front of him. It was a heartbreaking way to lose.
I don't think any of these kids for a second thought, "Good thing we lost now, otherwise our next tournament would have been shown on ESPN, and that would have been too much pressure." Playing on ESPN would have been an absolute blast.
Get a ball, a bat, nine gloves and tell the kids to go find a field and play. No adults around.
My neighbor's 7 year old son complains his Little League performance has been hampered by the clubhouse ban on Brownies.
Hopefully the 2008 Little League World Series MVP has the good sense to stay away from drugs... and Madonna.
I'm sure the little leaugers were just as excited to win decades ago, but they were not shown in prime time. Heck, when I was a kid, I literally thought people in the old days actually lived in black and white.
The MTV generation kicked me in the head during the men's gymnastics just last week. Most of the U.S. gymnasts couldn't get enough of rambling nonsense into the cameras. Sorry for the long rant, But it fires me up, ya' know.
Something similar happened during my cousin's (who's on a traveling team) game, the umpire missed the tag on what was to be the winning run. Batter supposedly tagged the runner, and threw to first to complete the double play, but since the ump didn't see the tag, the winning run scored.
Seeing this happen @ other levels of baseball, recreation & otherwise, I wish umpires would be more clear and decisive with their calls. It would eliminate a lot of confusion.
Of course, had a player not been called out for "unsportsmanlike conduct," (3-run homer negated because of a helmet flip), they probably would not be in that position.
National pride in sports doesn't bother me, except when its throw in someone's face.
Yet in any case, that is very different from going out of our way to configure teams around ethnic or national identities. Would you say it was ok to have a little league WS organized by race: "yay, the blacks beat the whites!" "Boo! I hate the yellow kids."
Organizing by nation, and imposing 19th century nationalist values is little better. These events end up being opportunities for conflict and division, or for international hostilities to play out in the world of sport (sometimes involving children), and can see basically no good coming from that.
You like nationalist sports? Check out the 1936 Olympics. That's the path it leads to.
Yeah, Jesse Owens was allowed to sit in the front of the bus, to drink from the "good" water fountain, to eat at whatever lunch counter he desired...
Did I miss something, have there been any charges of racial superiority @ the LLWS? @ the Olympics?
It's the Little League WORLD series, do you have any better ideas as to how they should assemble a team other than by country?
The increased coverage is driven by ESPN's ratings at all costs mentality and the self aggrandizement of the LL organization.
To replicate the often toxic sport-as-competition-between-nations at the little league level is appalling, in my opinion.
Still doesn't answer my question about assembling teams for the LLWS, if you don't want to do it by country.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.