Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
At New York Magazine, Will Leitch adds his two cents about the ailing Jorge Posada.
You think this is bad? Wait until it happens to the team's other nineties icons. Rivera is defying time with another peerless season, but Derek Jeter is in the seventh year of the ten-year contract that makes him the second-highest paid player in baseball (behind A-Rod, of course.) But forget the oft-debated (but still plainly obvious) defensive liability; the "Face of Baseball" is having the worst offensive season of his career. (As much as Posada has struggled, he has still hit better than Jeter by almost any metric.) As long as the Yankees are still making the playoffs, Jeter might be able to slide by unnoticed, but if they fall short...well, are you ready for chants of "Bench Jeter"?
It's hard to imagine Jeter aging gracefully isn't it? And jeez, if Rodriguez starts to break-down, like Chipper Jones has for instance, it will get downright fugly.
(blinking my eyes to read that twice)
The situation with Jeter, on the other hand, will only get ugly. Think Bernie but way worse. Jeter's pride/arogance, the fan's blind loyalty, and the organizational blind-spot towards him, will mean he will most likely be manning SS for the rest of his career as a Yank. And when his contract runs out, do you really see Jeter accepting a pay cut? Lets be honest, in 3 years, Jeter will be worth, what, $10M max? and that would probably be too much. I don't have a problem overpaying Jeter, but I am very opposed to the idea of another long, expensive contract simply because he's Derek F'ing Jeter...
As monkeypants has said, Jeter's not hitting badly this year for a shortstop. I also expect his offense to bounce back a little next year. But it probably won't support his playing any other position, and I don't know if he'll be able to play short adequately three years from now.
But let us not consider such things. There really isn't anything to be done. Jeter isn't going to be traded. He isn't going to move off SS unless/until he totally collaspes (in Varitekian fashion). So we basically just have to hold our collective breath and hope that our HoF SS defies the odds.
As someone said last night regarding the same topic: "LALALALA I Can't Hear You!"
"And the funny thing about this? No one's particularly sad to see him go. Newsday loudly proclaimed that the Yanks were "better off" without Posada, and his absence unquestionably eliminates a headache for manager Joe Girardi"
I for one am sad to see Posada on the DL. How the hell can Newsday say that the Yankees are better off w/o Posada? An injured, nonhitting Posada, sure, but not the all-star Jorge.
And are there more turbulent things going on in the Yankees' clubhouse than we know of?
Wouldn't you have to be some sort of smug douchebag to snicker at something like that?
This is a rapidly developing meme in the ol' baseball blogosphere. Could someone--anyone--please cite any evidence for this?
The argument used most often is that Jeter refused to give up SS for the better player, forcing A-Rod to be moved to third. But again, I have searched and searched, and I have not found anything resembling direct evidence that this was the case. The whole argument is circular, based on the assumption that Jeter SHOULD have moved. But do we know that he was asked? Do we know that he would have refused?
Have any former players or club officials stated that this was the case? Or that Jeter is particularly prideful or arrogant to the detriment of the team?
Show me the evidence!
And Donnie Baseball came back for one too many curtain calls? WTF? If anything, he avoided going that route.
Jeter (34), 2008: .285/.347/.404
Mattingly (34), 1995: .288/.341/.411
At least, not now.
Mostly because the place for Jeter to move was not 3B. After all, Jeter's problem defensively has been going to his left, so 3B was not a viable option. If he moved, he would have gone to CF, which means it would have displaced Bernie.
So the revelation won't come out, I'd guess, for a few decades. If ever. Too much love for those two.
16 Maybe. But the man was just voted the most overrated player by his peers. Yet there is still so much love that no one would come out with a negative comment? Tough for me to buy.
I think you suggested this? Or maybe RIYank. A natural place for Jeter to move at this stage might be 2B. But here too, he is blocked by Cano.
And while I'm sure I've suggested Jeter at 2B before, I know I haven't done it lately. Too bad Cano can't play SS.
Aside from the smug attitude, it also seems as if Leitch is unfamiliar with the Yankees. Off the bat Don Mattingly and Bernie most certainly did not wear out their welcome...1995 was all about getting the Captain to the playoffs (the loudest I've ever heard YS was when Donnie went deep in Game 2 of the ALDS) and Bernie received a standing ovation every time he came to the plate in his final year. It's also absurd to think that no one cares Posada is injured. I totally agree with 11 's eloquent appraisal of that opinion. Saying the loss of Posada is addition by subtraction pretty much disqualifies you from intelligent conversation.
No more Leitch please!
His bat hasn't been good and he can't throw. I'm sure the Yankees miss Posada being there, but as for on-field contributions they won't miss him.
23 I agree with you. I doubt that Jeter's the kind of guy that will hang it up after this contract and fade away gracefully. This is his town and his team. I could be wrong, but after the Bernie debacle, I'm a little more jaded.
Maybe to the fans he did not, but from a performance perspective, Bernie was toast in 2005, much less 2006. So on that one, Leitch is right.
But any definition so broad verges on tautological: Jeter's "pride", by your own definition, is little different from the "pride" of any other athlete, and so it tells us very little about Jeter's individual motives or future.
In order to be successful at a major league sport, I think you have to be a bit arrogant -- you've got to think: "I can hit Clemens or Unit, I'm that good." The trick is to not let it carry over to every aspect of your life.
That Jeter will likely be unwilling to walk away from the game doesn't bear significantly on more important questions:
1. Is this season a sign of inevitable and steep decline, or will he continue to put up valuable numbers on offense?
2. Will he be unwilling to change positions if that is the best course of action (here I contend that there is NO EVIDENCE he would be unwilling to do so if asked).
As for Posada, it's ridiculous to suggest that the Yankees are better off without a healthy version of himself. Clearly, if he can't hit or throw with the shoulder, they are better off. Again, however, Leitch says noone is "sad" to see him go, implying that his loss has not left a huge void on the team. That's pure stupidity.
I don't think that's even the question. More to the point: is there any other position he can play where his offense will still be a positive?
I think Mattingly had some game left when his career ended, which would explain why he would have a hard time with retiring.
But from I read @ waswatching, there was a rumor that the reason he retired was to be closer to his family which was going through some problems. But as was mentioned there, those were only rumors.
He didn't have to be dragged off the field, but he wasn't convinced he wanted to leave, either.
Again, here is an excerpt from Nov. 1995's NYT:
"I think we made it very clear how much we value Don Mattingly," the Yankees' principal owner said in a phone interview. "He's a true Yankee. There will be ongoing discussions between us while he thinks about what he wants to do."
Ray Schulte, Mattingly's business representative, said Steinbrenner had offered the 34-year-old first baseman an open-ended contract. Mattingly, the team's captain since 1991, declined the proposal because he might retire to be with his family in Evansville, Ind., or because he wants to observe how the new Yankees evolve.
"He offered him a contract and said what's your timetable and what's your money," Schulte explained. "It never got to that stage. Donnie put the organization ahead of himself. It was a tough decision. He told them to go get a first baseman."
Jeter allowed his "feud" with A-Rod to not onyl continue for years for little reason, but to come into the clubhouse. His arrogant denial of any issue, despite obvious indications otherwise, and unwillingness to ever come to the aid of his teammate, hurt the team.
But really that is besides the point. As JL25and3 puts it, there is little to suggest he would be able to justify playing elsewhere? I am not convinced he's necessarily falling off a cliff, but what I was suggesting was that there is absolutely ZERO evidence to suggest that Derek will make things easy. He has shown little tendency in the past to recognize his own flaws or go to the team and preemptively recognize his weaknesses to the betterment of the team.
Not for nothing, but it was in his year 35 season that Ripkin accepted the move to 3B as inevitable...Jeter is in his year 34
I don't pretend that it was easy, or that it should be. But I think it was a little closer to Bernie's situation than you make it seem.
It is unfair, in my opinion, to argue that all athletes need to project an air of confidence/arrogance/whatever, and then expect the same player to beg out of playing. And it's extra unfair to ask only one player (Jeter) to be so selfless but not hold basically all other athletes up to the same standard.
The reference to Ripken is somewhat bogus. He accepted the move to #B simply so he could hang on and break a meaningless counting record. Moreover, he moved to a position where his declining bat carried the position even less (though he did have that freaky good season at age 38). Was Ripken selfless for switching positions, or selfish for hanging on? Did he give the team no choice? Then again, is it the player's fault if the management is unable to make a right the call?
Finally, I am still not sure what sort of evidence you would want to show that Jeter would make things "easy" (whatever that means)? When he has been asked to bat in a different spot in the lineup, he always has (as far as we know), and has done so without complaining, like Abreu did. He has never publicly challenged the desires of the club, like Giambi did when he refused to go to the minors to rehab a few years ago. In 2004, when he had 16 sacrifice hits (well above his typical season average), he presumably was doing what the manager wanted in sacrificing himself (whether bunting is a good play is beside the point), even though he slugged .471 that year and hit 23 HRs. He certainly didn't intentionally bunt himself into an out to spite his manager, like Reggie did.
I am not claiming that Jeter is a saint or a perfect ball player or a perfect teammate. But I am amazed how often I read that he is selfish or arrogant or unwilling to help the team or will be a problem in the future or has been a problem in the past, when as far as I can see, there is NO EVIDENCE that he is any more prideful, etc. than just about any other pro athlete. You say that there is "is absolutely ZERO evidence to suggest that Derek will make things easy." I counter that there is just about zero evidence that he won't. The whole notion is based entirely on supposition and double standards.
However, if he continues to hit at least in the .750 OPS region ( he is currently at .751, and I think he'll finish the season closer to .800), his bat would play at 2B or SS.
Mattingly was forced out, plain and simple. He was granted free agency in November 1995, the Yankees traded for Tino in December, and Donnie didn't officially retire until January 1997.
http://tinyurl.com/5pdoqd
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.