Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Oakland Athletics
2007 Record: 76-86 (.469)
2007 Pythagorean Record: 79-83 (.489)
2008 Record: 34-29 (.540)
2008 Pythagorean Record: 37-26 (.588)
Manager: Bob Geren
General Manager: Billy Beane
Home Ballpark (multi-year Park Factors): Oakland Coliseum (93/93)
Who's Replacing Whom:
Daric Barton inherits Dan Johnson's playing time
Kurt Suzuki inherits Jason Kendall's playing time
Emil Brown replaces Shannon Stewart
Travis Buck inherits Mark Kotsay's playing time
Carlos Gonzalez and Ryan Sweeney (DL) replace Nick Swisher
Mike Sweeney and Frank Thomas replace Mike Piazza
Rajai Davis is filling in for Mike Sweeney (DL) and Frank Thomas (DL)
Donnie Murphy and Jack Hannahan inherit Marco Scutaro's playing time
Gregorio Petit is filling in for Donnie Murphy (DL)
Dana Eveland replaces Dan Haren
Greg Smith replaces Joe Kennedy and Dallas Braden (minors)
Rich Harden replaces Lenny DiNardo (minors) in the rotation
Justin Duchscherer replaces Chad Gaudin in the rotation
Chad Gaudin replaces Colby Lewis and Ruddy Lugo in the bullpen
Huston Street reclaims half of his save opportunities from Alan Embree
Embree replaces those save opportunities with innings reclaimed from Ron Flores
Keith Foulke replaces Jay Marshall
Brad Zielger is filling in for Santiago Casilla (DL)
25-man Roster:
1B - Daric Barton (L)
2B - Mark Ellis (R)
SS - Bobby Crosby (R)
3B - Eric Chavez (L)
C - Kurt Suzuki (R)
RF - Travis Buck (L)
CF - Carlos Gonzalez (L)
LF - Emil Brown (R)
DH - Jack Cust (L)
Bench:
L - Jack Hannahan (3B/IF)
R - Rajai Davis (OF)
R - Gregorio Petit (IF)
S - Rob Bowen (C)
Rotation:
R - Rich Harden
L - Dana Eveland
R - Justin Duchscherer
R - Joe Blanton
L - Greg Smith
Bullpen:
R - Huston Street
R - Kiko Calero
L - Alan Embree
R - Keith Foulke
R - Andrew Brown
R - Chad Gaudin
R - Brad Ziegler
15-day DL: R - Frank Thomas (DH), R - Mike Sweeney (1B), L - Ryan Sweeney (OF), R - Donnie Murphy (IF), R - Santiago Casilla, R - Joey Devine
Typical Lineup:
R - Mark Ellis (2B)
R - Bobby Crosby (SS)
L - Jack Cust (DH)
L - Eric Chavez (3B)
R - Emil Brown (LF)
L - Travis Buck (RF)
L - Daric Barton (1B)
L - Carlos Gonzalez (CF)
R - Kurt Suzuki (C)
A lot has been made this spring about the surprising starts of several teams. In the AL Central, Detroit and Cleveland have been surprisingly bad. Down in Florida, the Rays and Marlins have been surprisingly good (even if Baseball Prospectus's PECOTA saw the Rays coming). Still, I haven't heard all that much about the surprising performance of the A's, a team that entered the season in year one of a rebuilding phase only to shoot out of the gate looking like a contender.
The A's have the fifth-best record in the American League and are 3 1/2 games behind the Rays in the Wild Card race. More impressively, they have the best Pythagorean record in the league (and third-best in baseball behind the Cubs and Phillies). Look at that lineup above. Heck, look at the roster. That team has the best run differential in the American League.
What gives? Two things. First, the A's offense has been roughly league average, which is better than they really had a right to expect. The A's have scored just 0.01 runs per game less than the league average of 4.50 R/G despite playing their home games in the most extreme pitchers' park in the league. They've done this by being consistent at home (4.42 R/G) and on the road (4.59 R/G) and by doing what the Yankees were failing to do earlier in the year: get on base.
I know, big surprise coming from the original Moneyball team, but given the fact that the bulk of the A's lineup is composed of first- and second-year players and Emil Brown, I say it's impressive. Besides, the A's are far from the best on-base team in the league. They're nine points behind the Yankees in OBP and in eighth-place out of 14 teams, but that has put their overall run production eighth out of 14 as well, which, as I say, is good enough for league average for a team that plays in a pitchers' park. Of course, they'd be doing better without Brown (.289 OBP, but a team-best 37 RBIs thanks to all of the players ahead of him who actually do get on base), and home-grown catcher Kurt Suzuki (.316 OBP and a dismal .303 slugging) isn't helping much either.
The offense the Yankees will face over the next three nights is somewhat less than average, however, as two of the A's best on-base men (Frank Thomas, .417, who was a gift from the Blue Jays, and Ryan Sweeney, .353, part of the return for Nick Swisher) are on the disabled list. That's one reason that the A's are working to keep Jack Hannahan (.351), who did a fine job of filling in for the injured Eric Chavez over the first two months of the season, in the lineup now that Chavez (.353 in just eight games) has returned. Though both Chavez and Hannahan are lefty hitters, but Hannahan has been getting the hot corner starts against southpaws and, with Thomas on the shelf, has filled in at DH against righties, pushing Jack Cust back into the left field (and Brown to the bench). Hannahan can be used at first-base as well (though the one thing rookie gatekeeper Daric Barton has done well thus far has been get on base, with a .342 mark against a .231 average thanks to a walk total that trails only Cust on the team).
Still, an average offense does not explain the best run differential in baseball. No, that comes from the pitching staff, or, more specifically, the combination of the pitching staff and the ballpark. The A's have allowed runs at the second-lowest rate in baseball thus far this year, just a hair better than the similarly constructed Blue Jays. Still, the 4.44 runs per game the A's have allowed on the road is barely above league average and barely below what their offense gives them in the average road contest. Rather the crux of the A's success thus far has been the dominant performance of their pitchers in their home ballpark.
The A's have allowed just 3.25 R/G in Oakland and opposing hitters are batting just .222/.294/.323 at McAfee Coliseum this year. On the road, the A's are a .500 team (13-14 record, +4 run differential). At home, they're the best team in baseball (.583 winning percentage, .649 Pythagorean winning percentage). Because the A's have played 57 percent of their games at home thus far this year (and host the Yankees for three more starting tonight), that has been enough to place them among the best teams in the game as we get into the middle of June.
When the schedule evens out, the A's record likely will as well. Despite their Pythagorean success, they're really little more than a .500 team, if they can even sustain that. Their best starting pitchers are the injury prone Rich Harden (apparently healthy at the moment after an early-season DL stint) and converted reliever Justin Duchscherer, who missed most of last year to injury and spent most of April on the DL. In his start on Wednesday, Duchscherer will push his innings total to it's highest point since 2005. The other three A's starters have been merely average despite their lop-sided success at home (the most lop-sided of all being Greg Smith, who has a 2.84 ERA at home, but a 4.66 mark on the road).
Tonight, the Yankees face lefty Dana Eveland, who came over with Smith from the Diamondbacks in the Dan Haren trade. Eveland's ERA is 1.46 runs lower in Oakland than away from it this year (3.13 vs. 4.59), in large part due to hit luck (just 6.99 H/9 at home vs. 9.09 on the road--all that extra foul territory, you know). Still, two starts ago Eveland gave up seven runs in 4 1/3 innings to the underwhelming Toronto offense, and in his last start he lasted just 4 1/3 innings in part due to his walking seven in that short span. Both of those starts came at home. Of course, being able to get to Eveland won't mean much if Chien-Ming Wang can't pull out of his funk (8.75 ERA in his last four starts with a 5.32 BB/9).
Late night west coast games this week. We're leaving the light on for ya.
I wonder, do people think its better to bring young pitchers along as Joba has been? Some short relief (where pitch count isn't an issue) and then be stretched out, finally transitioning to a starter? Or is it better to just throw them to the wolves out of AAA al la IPK and Hughes? I'm divided at this point.
I really don't think that Hughes and Kennedy have been thrown to the wolves. The Yankees planned on limiting their innings, even before they got hurt. They just happen to have pitched brutally; Hughes hasn't been able to get his velocity much past 91 or 92 after blowing hitters away in the minors, and Kennedy has looked nothing like the second half call-up that he was in 2007.
Isn't that really the same thing, as it turns out? The flaw is in not admitting to rebuilding with new young pitchers when they have pitch limits to begin with. How do you expect to win it all when three-fifths of your starting pitching is not allowed to pitch a standard workload? Methinks that hubris has stymied this team as much as injuries to key players; there were a lot of factors that seemed to rely on luck or the propensity for extending one's career: Damon, Abreu, Giambi and Mussina are in walk years, so we expect them to produce their best? Hawkins was very good for one year in a controlled environment, so we expect him to continue that in spite of his past results outside of that environment? This is admittedly in retrospect, but then it still makes little sense to base these expectations on such variables.
What gets me the most is that we're told over and over again that New Yorkers demand winners at all cost, and will not accept a rebuilding team. Says who, Verducci? Gollem? Why do we let reporters dictate what is on our minds, and then refuse to hold them accountable for it when it turns out they're wrong?
To sum it all up: whatever, just play ball...
As for Joba, I disagree with you. I think if you have a potential ace you have to be as careful as you can. Contending in 2008 was always going to be a bit dicey. So much depended on how the kids pitched, how Cano and Melky played, etc. If you asked me to choose between making the playoffs this year or having Joba be strong for the next 6-8, I'd take the latter option every time. Is that really the choice? I don't know, but I'd rather err on the side of caution. Your opinion is certainly a valid one of course, I guess that's why they play the games :).
And Bruce, I know they have pitched brutally, but asking Hughes to be the #3 or 4 starter out of the gate at the age of 21 is sort of throwing him to the wolves. I thought he could handle it (I still do in fact), but that's a tall order for a 21 year old. I was studying for my GREs back then.
I do wonder, though, when Moeller/Molina get sent down/released, what position player (if any) will replace him. Gardner? AG? E Duncan? Have I forgotten someone?
https://bronxbanter.baseballtoaster.com/archives/421158.html
25 You're excused... (Unheralded Rookie Pitcher)
Cats and dogs living together! Mass Hysteria!
http://www.grimmy.com/comics.php
I'd rather then just send him down for someone who can at least pinch run. Actually, I'd like Gardner to take his spot and give him a couple games a week to see if he can take over center.
Unfortunately for Wang, he doesn't seem to be getting the low strike tonight.
May: .315 .446 .644 1.090
Jun: .348 .444 .739 1.183
LHP: .255 .433 .569 1.002
Insane OBP. Hard to bench those numbers.
Someone's gotta snap him into shape.
UGH!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U2xkHOTvvw
81 He's Mike Stanton, Jeff Nelson and Mike Myers all rolled into one!
I don't know, that Henderson kid wasn't bad.
Hey, Hammerhan. You're wife's a .......!!!!
That's a quote from Slapshot. And since this a family show, I will refrain from filling in the blank.
Love them double plays.
haha.
Sick minds should have better grammar.
David Cone had some good analysis the other night, about how Cano was staying back and rolling over the pitch outside, while Johnny Damon would take the same pitch and smack it to left field. I bet that would be borne out in the slo-mo.
Well you ain't gotta be rich to do nothing. Take a look at my cousin. He's broke, don't do shit.
This just in: Wilson Betemit is not a first baseman. He's also not a good right-handed hitter, either.
That play has gotta be made.
1) Betemit as a bat
2) the AG as a glove
3) somebody who can run a little
this means Shelley D's time should be up...
Throw more sinkers, please, Wang.
Ellis. This series' Yankee killer? He's annoying me already.
Oakland's stadium always seems so sad...all that foul territory is very upsetting for some reason...
Of course, in case you haven't noticed, Giambi's glove by some advanced metrics at least, has been league average (or better) this year . . .
to be fair, he's good on low throws and he has reasonable feet: he's in better shape this year, it makes sense he'd be quicker at first...
Man, we are going to have a lot of holes next year. RF, 1B, could be a bit dicey.
G-d damnit, Jeter is killing us. What is he hitting like .260 something? How many DPs has he hit into?
Jeter's AB was monumentally bad in this inning. You almost get the feeling the Yankees woukd have broken the game open otherwise.
180 Well, the theory is that if you take walks, eventually the hits will come with men on base. In the Earl Weaver/Bill James offense Patience isn't just for the hitters, it's for the fans too...
Personally, I'd lead him off and bat Damon second. That's kind of a backhanded way to move Jeter out of the way, while also trying to jumpstart him.
Bobby Crosby has missed about 250 games over the last 4+ years. Having a decent, healthy, shorstop is not too shabby.
we could pretend to be half-full people and assume that jeter and cano will turn it around at some point. but it's already june and it's particularly hard to envision cano changing his approach.
After the first inning, this game felt like a win, but Jeter's AB gave me that lump in my throat.
Giambi tags from first! Nice wheels, buddy!
Of course, if not for Jeffery Maier, who knows how 1996 would have turned out, eh.
Also, just because we have higher expectations for Jeter does not mean that his play is hurting the team more than Robbie.
197 Maybe that adds up, maybe it doesn't. The fact is that Robbie is creating a lot of outs, and that really hurts the team no matter where he bats.
http://mvn.com/milb-yankees/
Ok, I'm ready to be done with Melky. Paging Mr. Gardner...
Damn it...seven leadoff men. Can Wang keep leading a charmed life?
Mark Ellis, career: .268/.338/.412
Mark Ellis, vs Yanks: .234/.306/.297 (125 PAs)
If Cano's struggles become permanent, Gonzales at short and Jeter at second may be the long-term solution.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. : )
Besides, Sweden won this morning in Euro 2008, so nothing's going to ruin my mood today.
I do think that the manager needs to think about resting Jeter more frequently. He never seems to get the "half day off" afforded Posada and Damon, or a full day off. Betemit is on the team for a reason other than to BU1B, or so I thought.
Thing is, though, managers are reluctant to mess with a guy who's going good--& Damon is going better than good...
I hate Betemit in this situation...prove me wrong Wilson.
Comon Alex, gotta make that play.
Not throwing strikes and walking guys doesn't help me.
Farnsworth, meanwhile, was sitting with his face in his hands.
When was the last time Mo pitched four games in a row?
Chad Moeller.
BTW, the average MLB SS is hitting .701 OPS (90 OPS+), so Jeter (.710, .94) is still out-hitting his position, if only barely...before tonight.
Thank you, Melky.
I cannot, nay WILL NOT watch that man play shortstop again.
Whether you think it was a good move or not to lift him, I am just surprised that he did after the last turn through. Girardi pushed Rasner, Mussina and Pettitte, but pulled back on Wang. Right or wrong, the divergence is interesting.
Like the fat kid in little league.
August 15, 2003: Jack Cust (Solo Homer with a 3-run lead)
August 16, 2003: Luis Matos (Solo Homer with a 1-run lead)
So, very few people have seen Mo give up two homers in a week, since no one had electricity...
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.