Barra is treating this as 'the Pettitte story' and it isn't. Nor would there be a 'Roger story' in the everyday media absent perjury. This was a 'baseball story' with a lot of complicit parties.

This is widely repeated, but I believe it's incorrect. It is illegal to prescribe it except for the specified purposes; and, of course, it's illegal to distribute it without a script. But I'm pretty certain there's no law against simple possession or use.

Aside for the logical idiocy of the piece, the worst thing is that such a small excerpt has so many inaccuracies. For example:

1) Pettitte admitted that his father injected him with HGH in 2004. (And surely the most bizarre single piece of evidence to emerge during the entire hearing process is that Pettitte's dad stuck a needle in his son's ass.)

WRONG! Had Barra taken the time to read the deposition (see following quote), he'd know Pettitte injected himself.

"He ended up bringing me two syringes over to my house. And you know, I injected myself once in the morning and once at night."

2) In admitting this, Pettitte was in effect also admitting that he had lied to the Mitchell Commission

WRONG! Pettitte never spoke to the Mitchell Commission so he most certainly couldn't have lied to it.

3) Moreover, Pettitte was admitting to a crime.

WRONG! If I am not mistaken, in 2004 it was only a crime to possess HGH with intent to distribute. Pettitte's use would not have fallen afoul of the statutes at that time.

4) Having been snookered by Omar Minaya and the Mets in the Johan Santana deal

WRONG! Snookered by Minaya? Did Barra even bother to follow the events? Did he miss how desperately Minnesota wanted to trade him to the Yankees?

That's more mistakes than paragraphs. The only conclusion that I can draw is Barra doesn't know the law, doesn't know baseball and apparently doesn't know how to read. Too bad he knows how to write.

Such a poor piece is so beneath this Blog, I am kind of disappointed to see it posted.

From the Mitchell Report, pg. 224: "In order to provide Pettitte with information about these allegations and to give him an opportunity to respond, I asked him to meet with me; he declined."

http://files.mlb.com/mitchrpt.pdf

If Barra can't get facts in the public record right (he accuses Pettitte of lying to Mitchell, Pettitte never spoke to Mitchell) then why take time to discuss his arguments? Barra calls Pettitte a liar. I call Barra a sloppy hack.

Distribution of HGH without a prescription is a crime. BUT it would be pretty hard to prove the crime if the prosecutor couldn't prove what Andy's Dad was injecting into his boys ass actually was HGH. Without a sample and a lab report there's no chance for an indictment let alone getting a case to a jury. Andy's dad can probably breathe safe.

MLB's own report, the Mitchell report, recommends clemency for admitted users. Sorry, move along, there's nothing to see here either.

I don't think much of his latest take. There's more to good writing than harnessing the ability to string together some pretty sentences; unless you're a dilettante they should also say something cognizable. Maybe he should stop off at that bar and have a couple of drinks. The only people fighting over this article have to be the editors at the Voice who decided to go with it.

* Schumer and Grassley announced a set of proposals, acknowledging the problem that human growth hormone (HGH) is not a controlled substance. HGH is regulated by other laws, but it is not currently illegal to possess HGH, nor is its manufacturing process as closely regulated as that of anabolic steroids.

Schumer's proposal, entitled S.877, would add HGH as a Schedule III substance, equating it with anabolic steroids under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). That requires all legitimate manufacturers, distributors and dispensers of any controlled substance to register with the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA.) Manufacturers must keep data on production and disposal of their substances, including information on both sales and destruction.*

- http://tinyurl.com/2v267n

From a Sen. Grassley press release: http://tinyurl.com/2pgxyr

"Currently, simple possession of HGH is not a criminal offense. However, inclusion of HGH in the list of controlled substances would mean that if a person possesses HGH without a current, valid prescription, he or she could be prosecuted for possession of a controlled substance. Penalties for possession could be as high as three years imprisonment, depending on the circumstances of the case."

Duh.

How many days til Opening Day?

6 I don't read The Voice much anymore, but I imagine Barra's editors are satisified with this piece (despite it's lack of accuracy). Facts shmacts. Pettitte's the kind of privileged golden boy the downtown hipsters at The Voice like to kick when they can.

10 hGH KILLS PEOPLE AND DESTROYS THEIR LIVES! Didn't you get the memo?!

/sarcasm off

Non-sarcastic answer: because Bud Selig is a _______ moron.

It's weird I generally love Barra's stuff at Salon. This one just pissed me off. It's typical of the effete, snobbish, holier-than-though, uninformed dreck that has oozed from the 'Voice' over the last 20 years.

9 Thanks, I know what the transcript said, I was commenting on what Barra wrote. Sorry I didn't make that more clear but thanks for doing that, my bad. From this small sampling it looks like we didn't think much of this one. I'm greatful that Cliff has supplied a new post. This one could have caused me to have a Banterless day and thats no fun when you have the flu.

Remember everyone, without chemicals life itself would be impossible.

Also, this just occured to me...where did Kirk Radomski get his HGH/steroid supply? Did the Feds demand that information too, or were they too busy tracking down Paul Loduca's canceled checks.