Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
That kid has one of the better arms in baseball," said former Braves and Orioles pitching coach Leo Mazzone. "If you have an arm like that, he shouldn't be a setup guy. Your setup guy doesn't do you any good if your starting pitchers can't get you to him."..."I don't think the Yankees are risking injury by starting him," Mazzone said of Chamberlain. "I've always felt that if you have a regular time to pitch and programs to get the pitcher ready in between starts, it's easier to start than be in the bullpen."
(Anthony McCarron, N.Y. Daily News)
Pat Jordan likes to bust my chops about the Yankees, the team he grew up rooting for. He doesn't much like them much these days and never misses a chance to get under my skin when they are not playing well. His favorite rant this spring has been about Joba Chamberlain, about how the Yankees are wasting Chamberlain as a set-up man instead of using him as a starter. Well, that's one gripe Pat can't beat to death now that Chamberlain has officially begun the process of moving from the pen to the starting rotation.
In the Daily News, John Harper writes that this is a sign that, without conceeding anything yet, the Yankees are looking beyond this season to 2009. I agree. One thing that occured to me yesterday was how exciting it is going to be to watch this all unfold. To see Chamberlain pitch two, then three, four, five innings. I imagine his demeanor will change somewhat. All that fist-pumping is part of what comes with being a late-inning reliever, but I don't expect he'll do quite as much of as a starter--unless he gets out of a big jam in the sixth, seventh or eighth. Regardless, I'm goosed about the whole thing. Ain't you?
The bottom line with Joba is he has an innings limit, so a hybrid role was a requirement, not a luxury. The Yankees weren't wrong to start him as a reliever, and they aren't wrong to make him a starter now. While I believe they would have kept him in the pen a lot longer if things were going well, they aren't, so what difference does it make.
The bottom line with Joba is he has an innings limit, so a hybrid role was a requirement, not a luxury. The Yankees weren't wrong to start him as a reliever, and they aren't wrong to make him a starter now. While I believe they would have kept him in the pen a lot longer if things were going well, they aren't, so what difference does it make.
http://tinyurl.com/5mv85h
I also notice that there is some concern over Johan's performance:
http://tinyurl.com/leg3x
But I do ... as I posted earlier on the previous thread, Yankees are 5 back of Tampa Bay for wild card, and 2 1/2 back of the rest of a flounder-league. We have our MVP back, our near-MVP catcher perhaps returning in 2 weeks (if Jorge is toast, I withdraw my money). Cano really really ought to hit .300+ rest of the way so call him 'returning' as well.
I see no earthly reason to bail on 2008, ESPECIALLY when swinging Joba to the rotation was always the plan. Is it 2 weeks earlier? We can't know, given that (rightly) the team did NOT come forth with Joba Rules 2.0 this year.
I have always argued that this MAY be a transitional year in a variety of ways (new manager, kids maturing slowly, snaggle-toothed vets coming off the books, free agents not yet arrived) but it overstates the long-planned process with Joba to call it a pointing-to-2009.
a beer for william, who IS right once in a while!
It's pretty amazing to think about what the Yankees will look like in, say, two years. Aside from the Eternal Trinity, Chien-Ming Wang is going to be the old man of the squad. Of course, they're likely to spend the Giambi-Pavano-Damon windfall on at least one or two established stars, but we have no idea who those are so for now we can only imagine Jeter and Po and Mo sitting in their rocking chairs telling stories to the kids...
0 Call me excited as well!
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.